From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84CC95FBAA; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710888955; cv=none; b=l+qc4lEkk3SFyfz3raUgP4V2Casmk1jw4fehP7D2uKRuEhhOruAwz/b5UictgfKRRHa8KZFRNYBg3xT9vFemCvDZ/262kn9qKrNfYV+EMA0OO03SLd6cE8c8erRoB/vWOf0zB4elR+y6UgpzjVsyfiuHkjvf1o1l++8uGqsYAsE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710888955; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LuebInQdwk5g8fC0FsQuDoIixz7qsK+Hyyiar7PaBtA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=q5r+/cEjb44AQhIC/Nv1HpHBCYvR7wcPv8jAyPJZyaN6A3pEJ2v65wsqP5/VbYHYD0MndJJ1PYiDiYWWcg5dsyJ2ZOXn9ZP3iVdU8VJd4ROp9KTneIgBVe3+GGHgI2Ud7Ad7RR/k8eMQB4p8A3Z9ywbFTNVBYsgJMNEYmXj2PAA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=PqkcFeHa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="PqkcFeHa" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1710888954; x=1742424954; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=LuebInQdwk5g8fC0FsQuDoIixz7qsK+Hyyiar7PaBtA=; b=PqkcFeHaHjx0IkEO9/BHZrV2xCfzZWRQuZ0vW4VnIUIXebwJ8FI5MIc0 i/s0LuPJ6gDhsc4gwgf+dCi2nUSnt6djU8G32ErAwFUaITDRjtp3g/Dpy gBbUh/PdHUmkQiDFiROaVATTBt8zEimzGVXNKr8CjYDCeAjFu7hZ39HtT sHcyCugoMMAQ9bcTRhNKIBKEJxlIKgdRDGeTnRmSw7pCdjYbb9VycrUGm IgkGl1wbJbWmu6LYjlAHOeJ5FWVX8YLyhOrFNRzluKHhq4NmfTpignSfh T7x1K++lE5yeXRwdDjvkGR2vA8XeOkqvHKVNKujnLzC5vu6XbGgwa7MfF g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11018"; a="5630078" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,138,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="5630078" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Mar 2024 15:55:53 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,138,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="45049488" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b21307750695) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Mar 2024 15:55:51 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b21307750695 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rmiN3-000I91-0O; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:55:49 +0000 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 06:55:17 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Gregory Price Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Gregory Price Subject: [gmprice:sys_move_phys_pages_2024_3_14 2/3] :1600:2: warning: syscall move_phys_pages not implemented Message-ID: <202403200633.JizLbI2C-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline tree: https://github.com/gmprice/linux sys_move_phys_pages_2024_3_14 head: 18bc4aaa72396bf7409348958ba2bb3fad2d88c1 commit: 2727276faa0c537ef9df039aea1d6e7cb264e0db [2/3] mm/migrate: Create move_phys_pages syscall config: s390-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240320/202403200633.JizLbI2C-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 8f68022f8e6e54d1aeae4ed301f5a015963089b7) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240320/202403200633.JizLbI2C-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403200633.JizLbI2C-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> :1600:2: warning: syscall move_phys_pages not implemented [-W#warnings] 1600 | #warning syscall move_phys_pages not implemented | ^ 1 warning generated. -- In file included from arch/s390/kernel/asm-offsets.c:11: In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:16: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2188: include/linux/vmstat.h:522:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 522 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ In file included from arch/s390/kernel/asm-offsets.c:11: In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:19: In file included from include/linux/msi.h:27: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78: include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' 37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16' 102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x)) | ^ In file included from arch/s390/kernel/asm-offsets.c:11: In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:19: In file included from include/linux/msi.h:27: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78: include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' 35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32' 115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x)) | ^ In file included from arch/s390/kernel/asm-offsets.c:11: In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:19: In file included from include/linux/msi.h:27: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78: include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 692 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 700 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 708 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 717 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 726 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 735 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 13 warnings generated. >> :1600:2: warning: syscall move_phys_pages not implemented [-W#warnings] 1600 | #warning syscall move_phys_pages not implemented | ^ 1 warning generated. -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki