From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BE5F3EA62; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710937455; cv=none; b=Xe2aBV4ZD33Gv8lj5P/g1nYRjAWVQ3Lwyq0E03HxVGzjTWNb1e8zusfzJvCnPMjzlrMrHqx9GaJ4+IxkfUU9ams+maw/ZO71Kd12B1jDjgl/2gRX5e1w4I92dwHcxTY2+YtKlqSYmFrgLHsrM5qeCEvuWAXXC/BWqwr1qv2fRLo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710937455; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uFRRz/xZOCARhvtMuJbjs6yu1wLdsQrLx4DorVDaXCI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KZIWQxs6+m2c/S5pA2ArwSQmoYdtorZQOMDdZJDAo+K7ud3cX8pq+7L+edhSDM28c65VsN5lTmEbUZO3+JSudwf8pdOezN7txfixdLszcJX7ALL9l/+kdH8A5kDPitpH+8hXILgD0vlLYpz+ghQyHj88cPwhwqAWLCF6DQuWivg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Qg6CX0fh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Qg6CX0fh" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1710937454; x=1742473454; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=uFRRz/xZOCARhvtMuJbjs6yu1wLdsQrLx4DorVDaXCI=; b=Qg6CX0fhFUAX+d0sukA0KACHfkeF7nNhOF224KYnodG/hL1YLXsofryN vg6wXnEObtI01UZ+DhdxJqurG/bVJCXPnZGe/WRuMlXFqYKMu/SeAt953 /4A9N7FDPYvfp8hvZ8lKOhVJEvc5hxJkCNyn3trouneNhXw9zAK+6Uqgj Nh+ckvfb+vq/3evK9PtHqRo24rUvjlYTPLyznBIpocshpUkr7ptufltct EeuyfLRofdYwo5YXXgtKkTVkxpshbpzvE1gMDuTytXMTa5XkAbiCBFJTh Dv6ywWe+TR/T4WxikRkj0/i6g3lRHI7/Y+9XjOMS9ZmfeIPTBJ4C3IR9q A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11018"; a="17312322" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,140,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="17312322" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Mar 2024 05:24:11 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,140,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="14144803" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b21307750695) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Mar 2024 05:24:09 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b21307750695 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rmuzH-000Ibj-0l; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:24:07 +0000 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 20:23:08 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Lucas Tanure Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] clk: meson: T7: add support for Amlogic T7 SoC PLL clock driver Message-ID: <202403202033.qKlUi2cu-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240318114346.112935-2-tanure@linux.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240318114346.112935-2-tanure@linux.com> Hi Lucas, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on clk/clk-next] [also build test WARNING on robh/for-next krzk/for-next krzk-dt/for-next linus/master v6.8 next-20240319] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Lucas-Tanure/clk-meson-T7-add-support-for-Amlogic-T7-SoC-PLL-clock-driver/20240318-194707 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git clk-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240318114346.112935-2-tanure%40linux.com patch subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] clk: meson: T7: add support for Amlogic T7 SoC PLL clock driver config: arm64-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240320/202403202033.qKlUi2cu-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 8f68022f8e6e54d1aeae4ed301f5a015963089b7) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240320/202403202033.qKlUi2cu-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403202033.qKlUi2cu-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/clk/meson/t7-pll.c:87:29: warning: unused variable 'meson_pll_clk_no_ops' [-Wunused-const-variable] 87 | static const struct clk_ops meson_pll_clk_no_ops = {}; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 warning generated. vim +/meson_pll_clk_no_ops +87 drivers/clk/meson/t7-pll.c 86 > 87 static const struct clk_ops meson_pll_clk_no_ops = {}; 88 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki