Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] RDMA/mana_ib: Add flex array to struct mana_cfg_rx_steer_req_v2

Leon Romanovsky
2024-04-08T11:07:34Z

On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 04:23:34PM +0200, Erick Archer wrote:
> The "struct mana_cfg_rx_steer_req_v2" uses a dynamically sized set of
> trailing elements. Specifically, it uses a "mana_handle_t" array. So,
> use the preferred way in the kernel declaring a flexible array [1].
>
> At the same time, prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang
> of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with
> __counted_by can have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time via
> CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for
> strcpy/memcpy-family functions).
>
> Also, avoid the open-coded arithmetic in the memory allocator functions
> [2] using the "struct_size" macro.
>
> Moreover, use the "offsetof" helper to get the indirect table offset
> instead of the "sizeof" operator and avoid the open-coded arithmetic in
> pointers using the new flex member. This new structure member also allow
> us to remove the "req_indir_tab" variable since it is no longer needed.
>
> Now, it is also possible to use the "flex_array_size" helper to compute
> the size of these trailing elements in the "memcpy" function.
>
> Specifically, the first commit adds the flex member and the patches 2 and
> 3 refactor the consumers of the "struct mana_cfg_rx_steer_req_v2".
>
> This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle, and audited and
> modified manually. The Coccinelle script used to detect this code pattern
> is the following:
>
> virtual report
>
> @rule1@
> type t1;
> type t2;
> identifier i0;
> identifier i1;
> identifier i2;
> identifier ALLOC =~ "kmalloc|kzalloc|kmalloc_node|kzalloc_node|vmalloc|vzalloc|kvmalloc|kvzalloc";
> position p1;
> @@
>
> i0 = sizeof(t1) + sizeof(t2) * i1;
> ...
> i2 = ALLOC@p1(..., i0, ...);
>
> @script:python depends on report@
> p1 << rule1.p1;
> @@
>
> msg = "WARNING: verify allocation on line %s" % (p1[0].line)
> coccilib.report.print_report(p1[0],msg)
>
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays [1]
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [2]
> Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@outlook.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Split the changes in various commits to simplify the acceptance process
> (Leon Romanovsky).
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Remove the "req_indir_tab" variable (Gustavo A. R. Silva).
> - Update the commit message.
> - Add the "__counted_by" attribute.
>
> Previous versions:
> v1 -> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/AS8PR02MB7237974EF1B9BAFA618166C38B382@AS8PR02MB7237.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com/
> v2 -> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/AS8PR02MB723729C5A63F24C312FC9CD18B3F2@AS8PR02MB7237.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com/
> ---
> Erick Archer (3):
> net: mana: Add flex array to struct mana_cfg_rx_steer_req_v2
> RDMA/mana_ib: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic
> net: mana: Avoid open coded arithmetic

Unfortunately, I still can't take RDMA patch alone without the netdev
patches.

Jakub, do you want shared branch for this series or should I take
everything through RDMA tree as netdev part is small enough?

Thanks