From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0F3854F92; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713418822; cv=none; b=e9ZfYdtpmQNhgbWeshdXzCB73Ri0e6fxFhnuIOJWP1NcekmnmdtQqMWrLNro+5TAnuWCs1pz2/TO5cIgTgY5ya9PHpJl5JvDAFeStOIr0TKZ+MJST4l8dCKn7obdCHOvYTR00MVlfOSmpQliMc87IUpHupcMVq8D5ZODuNtClo0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713418822; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bTjx8rndt/PSO/6dNSTUflavw32jLsFtA0qjmagKIOI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=g2kg+tcjMU+N3l5kPANk6jMJQyaKVcCAHi4jnj29ziUbVOe+TqLcXWxvjIqTdCpsNiqvJsbrPUmYkWqeShce1SSDQr5y7cCm9MV4B/uE6lRwb9QRkp098MhX5FBNA07K8SZ8MRSmFUb9icBS2/KJD0OR9EamtXsI1V7l7bzX4M4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=e5w+MLyp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="e5w+MLyp" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1713418820; x=1744954820; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=bTjx8rndt/PSO/6dNSTUflavw32jLsFtA0qjmagKIOI=; b=e5w+MLypU0FtYLWzw/otZVFEuIJWNzvoAByALf+Z47vJBhw3mmnsOrMX QSOnw5aakW9PAv5N1WlAaww9NU/PcSGe0lCGYV7MPx8gMZBG35rWrUB5h iCDZgFunMd39OYR/Ik58VlFUe+M/nbHu7ptk90EbJ+sg3RwI4Bgj/XHAw kNG8PyS0fm4OlBhWw7YC9l6Fy2l2KAkatudL9RGtne9ihwZdYgzK/lKLB 3BeP3jszrqWIejXPC84mRHxUcCzQI4I/SFJMz/3e4Zx1X+YOkl7hcpdPv 4FBgY5RDbGj96MmlWJXYLxJ445aSDTcACwwzycMJMs6XYYPMJVC1uourn Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: PgfAB2bwQ1CzFgw0W4N6nA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: XDKsifYRQZCfjQWgbxSJHg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11047"; a="19549966" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,211,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="19549966" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Apr 2024 22:40:19 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ofsmR+8sRcG/x+ClL/kPeQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: QhL2448uQ9S0pi825yf5Fw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,211,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="22958156" Received: from unknown (HELO 23c141fc0fd8) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Apr 2024 22:40:14 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 23c141fc0fd8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rxKVF-0007Ls-1r; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0000 Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:39:33 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Oleksij Rempel , Alexandre Torgue , Jose Abreu , "David S. Miller" , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Maxime Coquelin , Woojung Huh , Arun Ramadoss , Richard Cochran , Russell King Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oleksij Rempel , kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 3/4] net: phy: realtek: provide TimeSync data path delays for RTL8211E Message-ID: <202404181340.89g7TIG1-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240417164316.1755299-4-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240417164316.1755299-4-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Hi Oleksij, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on net-next/main] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Oleksij-Rempel/net-phy-Add-TimeSync-delay-query-support-to-PHYlib-API/20240418-004607 base: net-next/main patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240417164316.1755299-4-o.rempel%40pengutronix.de patch subject: [PATCH net-next v1 3/4] net: phy: realtek: provide TimeSync data path delays for RTL8211E config: arm-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240418/202404181340.89g7TIG1-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240418/202404181340.89g7TIG1-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404181340.89g7TIG1-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/net/phy/realtek.c:278:2: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough] default: ^ drivers/net/phy/realtek.c:278:2: note: insert 'break;' to avoid fall-through default: ^ break; 1 warning generated. vim +278 drivers/net/phy/realtek.c 245 246 static int rtl8211e_get_timesync_data_path_delays(struct phy_device *phydev, 247 struct phy_timesync_delay *tsd) 248 { 249 phydev_warn(phydev, "Time stamping is not supported\n"); 250 251 switch (phydev->interface) { 252 case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII: 253 case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID: 254 case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID: 255 case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID: 256 /* The values are measured with RTL8211E and LAN8841 as link 257 * partners and confirmed with i211 to be in sane range. 258 */ 259 if (phydev->speed == SPEED_1000) { 260 tsd->tx_min_delay_ns = 326; 261 tsd->rx_min_delay_ns = 406; 262 return 0; 263 } else if (phydev->speed == SPEED_100) { 264 tsd->tx_min_delay_ns = 703; 265 tsd->rx_min_delay_ns = 621; 266 return 0; 267 } else if (phydev->speed == SPEED_10) { 268 /* This value is suspiciously big, with atypical 269 * shift to Egress side. This value is confirmed 270 * by measuring RGMII-PHY-PHY-RGMII path delay. 271 * Similar results are confirmed with LAN8841 and i211 272 * as link partners. 273 */ 274 tsd->tx_min_delay_ns = 920231; 275 tsd->rx_min_delay_ns = 1674; 276 return 0; 277 } > 278 default: 279 break; 280 } 281 282 phydev_warn(phydev, "Not tested or not supported modes for path delay values\n"); 283 284 return -EOPNOTSUPP; 285 } 286 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki