From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD0583BBD2; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 07:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714202613; cv=none; b=NVwjdR/5os0aZPwZf5TNBijKtb37VvZh6L0l7ADfCYJfRSdJi5mRk7jJj44ePSI8PPvol9yBoW8NPq8RAWBpc/xQD6vHn9UCXRKEzEnIQSG95BAlDTrKKjjehGbkRWMU3rcjSBS+sjnZaZd1Mj8JUp0bajiVtX3SmyAL7cu1ocs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714202613; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RPm2XP32BCDPQzjVArvY0800OJdpqTLc1x+QG2YEoNs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oKjJJ7DPN+aZU8looLFWCxWq34RZNknIsulMnqjJVc6RzWL5M5nLDBCOJi/e6rAu2sl5FGTcRHU2zu7CIFVGKOZIvSi9tcoxGgzAr1N3uPH+ifxFoIfWZUZNKor4rNJ3qoGxtb+tPrNiB/qHLNIV58FOfkb5cHu3PxQOuUXSgJM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=IqU/nvGp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="IqU/nvGp" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1714202611; x=1745738611; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=RPm2XP32BCDPQzjVArvY0800OJdpqTLc1x+QG2YEoNs=; b=IqU/nvGprJdHt6HEEacM9jr9JwvoXHMvj5Nlxq44lrxvc7HUVgjm8KGj c9Tg8y/IG0TXEBiqUxIzDEaiBHvQKu1S+WIsPngBw6GTgQ39LHEuXcxfL s0pRC8Xi87XXtePZX/SnNGOryV7KSRo6t0nx9kl3PpqzlsGni9qZ6ePMu 3l+K+TDu4YV61OaNiC+xYfDpehTCv9NmFyt/YS0GILs62ESz6BNsjXpx0 mfxi3kINSeIYVRN3wadc/cXplNFzf31dNMBBvCjYV/7/qU/n6F/sJ592e EDHXJ/ALVWXbHQGS9DJQ6RlomlZ+xaroSYpSlPhUphXHQAPih4YqvUeqh w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: yXngHpL3TFiaWOm8J+rnuQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 1UXrn80LQNujvkhIhkf10g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11056"; a="32440473" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,235,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="32440473" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Apr 2024 00:23:31 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: G99nj9nQRj+Mcr3cakxJzg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: tLg9q/dyRWWoHpu6IOC4rA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,235,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="25605193" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO e434dd42e5a1) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Apr 2024 00:23:27 -0700 Received: from kbuild by e434dd42e5a1 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1s0cP6-0004ks-0V; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 07:23:24 +0000 Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 15:23:02 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Kefeng Wang , Andrew Morton Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List , willy@infradead.org, David Hildenbrand , Miaohe Lin , Naoya Horiguchi , Oscar Salvador , Zi Yan , Hugh Dickins , Jonathan Corbet , Vishal Moola , Kefeng Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] mm: memory_hotplug: check hwpoisoned page firstly in do_migrate_range() Message-ID: <202404271547.obYnCedG-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240425084028.3888403-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240425084028.3888403-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Hi Kefeng, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kefeng-Wang/mm-memory_hotplug-check-hwpoisoned-page-firstly-in-do_migrate_range/20240425-164317 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240425084028.3888403-2-wangkefeng.wang%40huawei.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 01/10] mm: memory_hotplug: check hwpoisoned page firstly in do_migrate_range() config: s390-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240427/202404271547.obYnCedG-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 5ef5eb66fb428aaf61fb51b709f065c069c11242) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240427/202404271547.obYnCedG-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404271547.obYnCedG-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from mm/memory_hotplug.c:9: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2253: include/linux/vmstat.h:500:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 500 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 501 | item]; | ~~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:507:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 507 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 508 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:514:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 514 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:519:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 519 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 520 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:528:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 528 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 529 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from mm/memory_hotplug.c:30: include/linux/mm_inline.h:47:41: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 47 | __mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, NR_LRU_BASE + lru, nr_pages); | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ include/linux/mm_inline.h:49:22: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 49 | NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE + lru, nr_pages); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ In file included from mm/memory_hotplug.c:34: In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5: In file included from include/linux/io.h:14: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78: include/asm-generic/io.h:548:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 548 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:561:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 561 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' 37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16' 102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x)) | ^ In file included from mm/memory_hotplug.c:34: In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5: In file included from include/linux/io.h:14: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78: include/asm-generic/io.h:574:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 574 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' 35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32' 115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x)) | ^ In file included from mm/memory_hotplug.c:34: In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5: In file included from include/linux/io.h:14: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78: include/asm-generic/io.h:585:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 585 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:595:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 595 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:605:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 605 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:693:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 693 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:701:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 701 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:709:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 709 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:718:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 718 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:727:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 727 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:736:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 736 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ >> mm/memory_hotplug.c:1786:13: error: call to undeclared function 'hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1786 | mapping = hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write(&folio->page); | ^ mm/memory_hotplug.c:1786:13: note: did you mean 'hugetlb_folio_mapping_lock_write'? include/linux/hugetlb.h:181:23: note: 'hugetlb_folio_mapping_lock_write' declared here 181 | struct address_space *hugetlb_folio_mapping_lock_write(struct folio *folio); | ^ >> mm/memory_hotplug.c:1786:11: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'struct address_space *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion] 1786 | mapping = hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write(&folio->page); | ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 19 warnings and 2 errors generated. vim +/hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write +1786 mm/memory_hotplug.c 1774 1775 static bool isolate_and_unmap_hwposion_folio(struct folio *folio) 1776 { 1777 if (WARN_ON(folio_test_lru(folio))) 1778 folio_isolate_lru(folio); 1779 1780 if (!folio_mapped(folio)) 1781 return true; 1782 1783 if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio) && !folio_test_anon(folio)) { 1784 struct address_space *mapping; 1785 > 1786 mapping = hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write(&folio->page); 1787 if (mapping) { 1788 /* 1789 * In shared mappings, try_to_unmap could potentially 1790 * call huge_pmd_unshare. Because of this, take 1791 * semaphore in write mode here and set TTU_RMAP_LOCKED 1792 * to let lower levels know we have taken the lock. 1793 */ 1794 try_to_unmap(folio, TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK | TTU_RMAP_LOCKED); 1795 i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping); 1796 } 1797 } else { 1798 try_to_unmap(folio, TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK); 1799 } 1800 1801 return folio_mapped(folio); 1802 } 1803 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki