From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 452C4FBF3; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 04:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717388228; cv=none; b=RYzMQecASuTBg9NzbjPQ8NtWXmh7y5iHythBzzY7fDKeF/TGDW9GFkK3juUjVohriCItMV3VaX5No9BE3qjxc+P93Sx7lhu5ExYXiKIa9wxyX1wfh2tG1M0SIsZFyXB165EmcwifLw808mPb781kwMfkUfwJtJbpAd8LCcr7v4M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717388228; c=relaxed/simple; bh=O/4sSGwgaQocie1Gnbe9oYv7EOtmCu7aDVA49dj2VnY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kIjvmWi3SskJFnhCu3vL0glOP8mf81b+tHIu53N7BvJo+dqxpn0i6z8IcSr5V0beC9dAjHRE+DQQAOtyUlT3O6Uwf74QE1YtvXS61u6yPP4SRhPzQoizekD8DcuVIIAv10Tb+HajDbbZvFkwL86aHw7dg1aW8BC9TPOx3aHa8H0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=MectnGOu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="MectnGOu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1717388226; x=1748924226; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=O/4sSGwgaQocie1Gnbe9oYv7EOtmCu7aDVA49dj2VnY=; b=MectnGOuOuP43Nudt9Y410Ktn389jI8Bk5IvrLWDQ1iitAGlN9lS40xN bA6PHs4yQEiFDHyg3rZESvcfPCLDIBrJkUmHhF1w/Qbs5JqFZdVv50eyl fM2rcfQI4Cah5T2FHhoiFeIAUz5Uj+mIUDk5GEzIZk6YkZtazoWXMp5Lx QgarzouDSQiwU8gjvq3aVIjzbAmg/lJ0l3ZoliIrnseK6RwcMeM6otPk3 Pqdx/++Vc4pYypMW73W4l2fuI722AyF87nS3N0COIiw4gNVMEyHZVZrum m6n8DFQTUaQ92Z/O2zdMfeuutG0oa8/KJopdHPbGOLuOFVlvdew4nWjka Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: MrO+OKNiTvClZFHvhtXOBw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Ee3duRyeReWsCtalfzfvvQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11091"; a="39269415" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,210,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="39269415" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jun 2024 21:17:05 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 6f6rtPN+RLOh83WH3GdKzA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Cjbm2nWZT6KdWLY6C9xA1Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,210,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="41839561" Received: from unknown (HELO 0610945e7d16) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Jun 2024 21:17:02 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 0610945e7d16 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sDz7z-000L0z-21; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 04:16:59 +0000 Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 12:16:02 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Kent Overstreet , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Jens Axboe , Kent Overstreet , brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Bernd Schubert , linux-mm@kvack.org, Josef Bacik Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] fs: sys_ringbuffer Message-ID: <202406031142.Xw5hn2Ks-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240603003306.2030491-4-kent.overstreet@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240603003306.2030491-4-kent.overstreet@linux.dev> Hi Kent, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on tip/locking/core] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.10-rc2] [cannot apply to akpm-mm/mm-nonmm-unstable tip/x86/asm akpm-mm/mm-everything next-20240531] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kent-Overstreet/darray-lift-from-bcachefs/20240603-083536 base: tip/locking/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240603003306.2030491-4-kent.overstreet%40linux.dev patch subject: [PATCH 3/5] fs: sys_ringbuffer config: arm-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240603/202406031142.Xw5hn2Ks-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project bafda89a0944d947fc4b3b5663185e07a397ac30) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240603/202406031142.Xw5hn2Ks-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406031142.Xw5hn2Ks-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> :1603:2: warning: syscall ringbuffer not implemented [-W#warnings] 1603 | #warning syscall ringbuffer not implemented | ^ >> :1606:2: warning: syscall ringbuffer_wait not implemented [-W#warnings] 1606 | #warning syscall ringbuffer_wait not implemented | ^ >> :1609:2: warning: syscall ringbuffer_wakeup not implemented [-W#warnings] 1609 | #warning syscall ringbuffer_wakeup not implemented | ^ 3 warnings generated. -- In file included from arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2253: include/linux/vmstat.h:514:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 514 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ 1 warning generated. >> :1603:2: warning: syscall ringbuffer not implemented [-W#warnings] 1603 | #warning syscall ringbuffer not implemented | ^ >> :1606:2: warning: syscall ringbuffer_wait not implemented [-W#warnings] 1606 | #warning syscall ringbuffer_wait not implemented | ^ >> :1609:2: warning: syscall ringbuffer_wakeup not implemented [-W#warnings] 1609 | #warning syscall ringbuffer_wakeup not implemented | ^ 3 warnings generated. -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki