From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E08E936C; Sat, 20 Jul 2024 00:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721434195; cv=none; b=WE5dIE+545Aj1rfmVJFT5N5pPt/wzgd6VoJ2IsMXSWbePFbxr4dwpBq+TuoJho32eMdCn8I2p6WXagL+RKD67ai55h8DIRi3yHEPk+BCBuK5WnKcYmLEb63/Hk65uqaxOP28J+bhEfgI3KrodF7jPpIyGd0ITWvLbncBm3kXhVo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721434195; c=relaxed/simple; bh=S8smwMyzgC9wxsokX2daT9U9m5k9yMI7P25lgujUbjY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=Ch80ENtR9cNIeoWzwCaXpEcYrEm0pH6zUsOAWbrOb5SScEsNn/XCyVK5cV+3ulNsZ+kMCJ0qR8USbEBpJtQEkoCXfsEs9IRNsKMFZnqV5bpSCuUtLr5B+ALEd7/7emZ2anhTHN3G/NJvCIUiHnJtmVeTkfBIniRt6qtzSsAdomw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=hCPuGw55; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hCPuGw55" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1721434193; x=1752970193; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=S8smwMyzgC9wxsokX2daT9U9m5k9yMI7P25lgujUbjY=; b=hCPuGw556PSdu87MzrfhyTldyEdh1zd+30fTTe71Xuez/lRNIZrCNFJh faFYGqnL+hCtzG07vdE0rpGJUO37tfacSMan/Y9LWT9aKqBruUJ3z8hAL CcwmC2VkvEu4sOHYIuCE9uN3s4Vie0BatydZok+8enMo8MrGwI01BvzQe 2ITDc7crxIjMQHed3Etv0kYXSgFZbO2wu6S98jNCMIvliOKJ9pnf3vOYk WcjcXmycOCZmAs7r9LU9TEslUfbYssQ8mSE5Wq4iGJVcUBJzcDvPPB+FP nsr4TEw7n+C9iF/IRPKOuYiv0GpfV3e6ZH3Tz6o7NjwPVEX5Uvdxs83OZ g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: TUxCbQxWQ22nY3+OXEFVRw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: krrFmz9mSwenOWOMTwBpCA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11138"; a="30462261" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,222,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="30462261" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jul 2024 17:09:53 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XkrocWyOSrm6YRZYYbdSPA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: zusw3cRaSeO7YcDwAmDxIA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,222,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="55457569" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 68891e0c336b) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Jul 2024 17:09:51 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 68891e0c336b with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sUxfZ-000ih4-0g; Sat, 20 Jul 2024 00:09:49 +0000 Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 08:09:22 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: "Alex Shi (Tencent)" Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: [alexshi:mmunstable3 30/35] mm/memory.c:448:38: error: controlling expression type 'pte_t *' not compatible with any generic association type Message-ID: <202407200816.l8AlPCUO-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline tree: https://github.com/alexshi/linux.git mmunstable3 head: 3fb6eb9b0272c82ed231fdf2a20f6b6d265c4259 commit: f6ba7ce983a499c1f4c6066fdf135e5a2b464054 [30/35] mm/memory: use ptdesc in __pte_alloc config: s390-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240720/202407200816.l8AlPCUO-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ad154281230d83ee551e12d5be48bb956ef47ed3) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240720/202407200816.l8AlPCUO-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407200816.l8AlPCUO-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from mm/memory.c:44: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2221: include/linux/vmstat.h:514:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 514 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ In file included from mm/memory.c:45: include/linux/mm_inline.h:47:41: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 47 | __mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, NR_LRU_BASE + lru, nr_pages); | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ include/linux/mm_inline.h:49:22: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 49 | NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE + lru, nr_pages); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ In file included from mm/memory.c:84: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93: include/asm-generic/io.h:548:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 548 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:561:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 561 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' 37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16' 102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x)) | ^ In file included from mm/memory.c:84: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93: include/asm-generic/io.h:574:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 574 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' 35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32' 115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x)) | ^ In file included from mm/memory.c:84: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93: include/asm-generic/io.h:585:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 585 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:595:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 595 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:605:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 605 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:693:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 693 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:701:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 701 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:709:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 709 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:718:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 718 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:727:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 727 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:736:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 736 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ >> mm/memory.c:448:38: error: controlling expression type 'pte_t *' not compatible with any generic association type 448 | struct ptdesc *ptdesc = page_ptdesc(pte_alloc_one(mm)); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/s390/include/asm/pgalloc.h:140:28: note: expanded from macro 'pte_alloc_one' 140 | #define pte_alloc_one(mm) ((pte_t *)page_table_alloc(mm)) | ^ include/linux/mm_types.h:510:37: note: expanded from macro 'page_ptdesc' 510 | #define page_ptdesc(p) (_Generic((p), \ | ^ 15 warnings and 1 error generated. vim +448 mm/memory.c 445 446 int __pte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd) 447 { > 448 struct ptdesc *ptdesc = page_ptdesc(pte_alloc_one(mm)); 449 if (!ptdesc) 450 return -ENOMEM; 451 452 pmd_install(mm, pmd, (pgtable_t *)ptdesc); 453 if (ptdesc) 454 pte_free(mm, ptdesc_page(ptdesc)); 455 return 0; 456 } 457 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki