From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7B8A1EB35; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:58:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726574290; cv=none; b=D4WkFyG7hEnv/P3bwDqzWZgJLcW1dvvIz5dzc6vBaVv1jzPwU+lbtYg4cZxQO6YGeAyaE1I80itInycyISXSG3Pr6clk7Fqy91p8mgx0/xw47ZRBnLucVkL2apTmGrj7q01a9QDNrbMFvCYh8SNbCbE9BuZfDAwkT5WGZb8CQsw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726574290; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rNtMyRI9Qdo+E11cUe4G7hmk/ddhcuAu+3msnYiIg0s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=ZWZKnEfttnrXHyYXAM4p3MTMtmgJp5iw7+WMpZABiXryWoFX4HbfhTIdRVlJ/Se7k70tooLouAfJwX8pMq4cAHhbIIAhG9+kWe0UQEXBy50MThYAQ9Bvu2JTF3Ws3cJU4/7Ne5sWH9qs+LynuFjjm9tXmBr++pN7OKHgqT6dDek= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=fIwzpc7h; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="fIwzpc7h" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1726574288; x=1758110288; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=rNtMyRI9Qdo+E11cUe4G7hmk/ddhcuAu+3msnYiIg0s=; b=fIwzpc7hWHMAI/USu1FH+SlGDuRuP2EtOquQNup9DUr2PefhjmiLK/LV vJEiuRRp950nJGQIhEu0qbitpf/oyQFCgXUgNpsDBivMa9fwOqPQbxtY1 O3TfN68vemhlxP6qVkeXTXFeljbohwTcguB+EzQ7r0ePMLCk+c/DUxAa6 0w3ZvBOczqvaKGEld01T94tUKymWLasRTG0/SLgn5SrMZnBgt0R5TdXe6 Vz+v7V9AHQ3dCbB3aTMkbQ0Kbm9PUd6fPFvYdG+Elm4CJfoav9pBLEkEA wBBORchItDsFhjDpBkozlHCyVLNLa/7Mi0ei/tVzOZ00eVA36xMFZLNQq Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: rx9tOTOLTRO4goXnArZEFw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ZexyT8yMS/Kh/m8uL62OyQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11197"; a="36802748" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,235,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="36802748" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Sep 2024 04:58:08 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: d7uqc18DS7KM1+Nfy8XA9A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: vny/MWLmTMeKNdlNG+gdbQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,235,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="69133134" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 53e96f405c61) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2024 04:58:07 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 53e96f405c61 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sqWqK-000B6s-10; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:58:04 +0000 Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 19:57:47 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: [jpoimboe:sframe-2.1 3/5] mm/init-mm.c:45:26: error: expected expression Message-ID: <202409172221.nJprwP5F-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jpoimboe/linux.git sframe-2.1 head: 5b35eb7c617539f21cbe3764b0ee0c77567b0f22 commit: a0737313b793121a36e5830518ba23e53131d9fc [3/5] unwind: Introduce sframe user space unwinding config: s390-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240917/202409172221.nJprwP5F-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project bf684034844c660b778f0eba103582f582b710c9) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240917/202409172221.nJprwP5F-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409172221.nJprwP5F-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from mm/init-mm.c:8: In file included from include/linux/mman.h:5: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2232: include/linux/vmstat.h:517:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 517 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ In file included from mm/init-mm.c:13: In file included from include/linux/iommu.h:10: In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93: include/asm-generic/io.h:548:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 548 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:561:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 561 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' 37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16' 102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x)) | ^ In file included from mm/init-mm.c:13: In file included from include/linux/iommu.h:10: In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93: include/asm-generic/io.h:574:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 574 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' 35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32' 115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x)) | ^ In file included from mm/init-mm.c:13: In file included from include/linux/iommu.h:10: In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93: include/asm-generic/io.h:585:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 585 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:595:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 595 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:605:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 605 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:693:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 693 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:701:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 701 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:709:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 709 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:718:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 718 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:727:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 727 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:736:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 736 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ >> mm/init-mm.c:45:26: error: expected expression 45 | INIT_MM_CONTEXT(init_mm), | ^ 13 warnings and 1 error generated. vim +45 mm/init-mm.c 18 19 /* 20 * For dynamically allocated mm_structs, there is a dynamically sized cpumask 21 * at the end of the structure, the size of which depends on the maximum CPU 22 * number the system can see. That way we allocate only as much memory for 23 * mm_cpumask() as needed for the hundreds, or thousands of processes that 24 * a system typically runs. 25 * 26 * Since there is only one init_mm in the entire system, keep it simple 27 * and size this cpu_bitmask to NR_CPUS. 28 */ 29 struct mm_struct init_mm = { 30 .mm_mt = MTREE_INIT_EXT(mm_mt, MM_MT_FLAGS, init_mm.mmap_lock), 31 .pgd = swapper_pg_dir, 32 .mm_users = ATOMIC_INIT(2), 33 .mm_count = ATOMIC_INIT(1), 34 .write_protect_seq = SEQCNT_ZERO(init_mm.write_protect_seq), 35 MMAP_LOCK_INITIALIZER(init_mm) 36 .page_table_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_mm.page_table_lock), 37 .arg_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_mm.arg_lock), 38 .mmlist = LIST_HEAD_INIT(init_mm.mmlist), 39 #ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK 40 .mm_lock_seq = 0, 41 #endif 42 .user_ns = &init_user_ns, 43 .cpu_bitmap = CPU_BITS_NONE, 44 #ifdef INIT_MM_CONTEXT > 45 INIT_MM_CONTEXT(init_mm), 46 #endif 47 #ifdef INIT_MM_SFRAME 48 INIT_MM_SFRAME, 49 #endif 50 }; 51 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki