From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 496F219306D; Sun, 22 Sep 2024 01:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726968858; cv=none; b=RCgzGG96XXU8vh+2eWSXE1u/XZqrCjJoYH7OTMJ9ysZZJcBzr5YzJeVx9jJm0ouFCarHs695cuHJM+ayGw3yYN0KDwC/1bbfKmICb7jmRroDA5kV3s4toOk4wezr3Wo//Bzsgl0oeiTDk5qv+DQWwU3dsfMcNpZu9s5Auq5U24E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726968858; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zAFLtykeehVz6NlPD7k40sEepQa7MH97AX9LEEO51eg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kTXcSolTfKtcNeA0UMd5c58DdWIq9ogIYGm5w9aVNmq02alnBjtzIjmKKxt3l2/Z5RyAcKhylcvWplHZuIgQbzztLTwGEgqyk8+v9VRlSp7Y+xORIo+YHozOVEIdaCktVYYCJGxAVBNpVD0YHad9FlQE8vTY0KDnO14RHpD7o/c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=NCItdcjZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="NCItdcjZ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1726968857; x=1758504857; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=zAFLtykeehVz6NlPD7k40sEepQa7MH97AX9LEEO51eg=; b=NCItdcjZhnTg5InKT8plhEhVXNW1MgFp4QlxhRR4eCOF5k3UVWVQZsfw 9KIs2EZV2rWpzoRK+7kyaciMVGfZVIWB3lgeDF6h+qpjBKR0mm249jFIq W9usFxwVDLuxEt6ZRYXDYpTtynTuJyCPca7PwKLVzc7elF/so2rOkjKtK lmQllG23Ik/5Go7A3l2J9DH31cx2udwLhNAmBWtthoUKBUUyuAwrx4K7t cLvw0cD3XIl52Q+iisiep2iw/XbIYkSJ2WyGCAcSdNlyqVxNjkSx1Rld2 7R6aBjubsKjoFw1HNBb4+00/JUMjP4xMrqLYevfrCicEC7DIDpXvvmj7z g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: TtqDK2TdRluDcXvLlJXK5w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: T7je9RFmQIGyGHEdbDvrOw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11202"; a="37077095" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,248,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="37077095" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Sep 2024 18:34:13 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: mQRUdHG0SS22A/Mlj4Vs6A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 5ntGIEzZSAG3BwZUjXeDwA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,248,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="74809218" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 53e96f405c61) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Sep 2024 18:34:11 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 53e96f405c61 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ssBUH-000FwK-1O; Sun, 22 Sep 2024 01:34:09 +0000 Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 09:33:33 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: "D. Wythe" Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] net/smc: Introduce a hook to modify syn_smc at runtime Message-ID: <202409220912.ueH73mHB-lkp@intel.com> References: <1726654204-61655-1-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1726654204-61655-1-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> Hi Wythe, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on net-next/main] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/D-Wythe/net-smc-Introduce-a-hook-to-modify-syn_smc-at-runtime/20240918-181133 base: net-next/main patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1726654204-61655-1-git-send-email-alibuda%40linux.alibaba.com patch subject: [RFC PATCH net-next] net/smc: Introduce a hook to modify syn_smc at runtime config: arm-randconfig-002-20240922 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240922/202409220912.ueH73mHB-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 8663a75fa2f31299ab8d1d90288d9df92aadee88) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240922/202409220912.ueH73mHB-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409220912.ueH73mHB-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from net/smc/af_smc.c:27: In file included from include/linux/if_vlan.h:10: In file included from include/linux/netdevice.h:38: In file included from include/net/net_namespace.h:43: In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:17: In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10: In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:8: In file included from include/linux/cacheflush.h:5: In file included from arch/arm/include/asm/cacheflush.h:10: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2232: include/linux/vmstat.h:517:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 517 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ net/smc/af_smc.c:194:36: error: no member named 'skc_v6_daddr' in 'struct sock_common' 194 | rmt6_sockaddr->sin6_addr = ireq->ir_v6_rmt_addr; | ~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/net/inet_sock.h:74:42: note: expanded from macro 'ir_v6_rmt_addr' 74 | #define ir_v6_rmt_addr req.__req_common.skc_v6_daddr | ^ >> net/smc/af_smc.c:3519:9: error: call to undeclared function 'register_btf_fmodret_id_set'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 3519 | return register_btf_fmodret_id_set(&bpf_smc_fmodret_set); | ^ net/smc/af_smc.c:3519:9: note: did you mean 'register_btf_kfunc_id_set'? include/linux/btf.h:623:19: note: 'register_btf_kfunc_id_set' declared here 623 | static inline int register_btf_kfunc_id_set(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, | ^ 1 warning and 2 errors generated. vim +/register_btf_fmodret_id_set +3519 net/smc/af_smc.c 3516 3517 static int __init bpf_smc_kfunc_init(void) 3518 { > 3519 return register_btf_fmodret_id_set(&bpf_smc_fmodret_set); 3520 } 3521 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki