From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D9A5157490; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727250914; cv=none; b=WhMQ0Pa5MS9ZobqBy/gWfNXYHz33ONYZZcBD7kvjQnxVk8R2fCrTeJayARd2BErwh+AVIwSBETu3IQVmI2RiYLHYHL4dgGWPsgUewYyO6HRO8X7vJ5Tb7OgCCzsL9RQxPmBekxF0CazRsWlFv+BrSlBzAliIn/7ZsG03IqgI9cI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727250914; c=relaxed/simple; bh=onnuYLvkaKKSJNLqIp8eCNb0T4hkLx7Ysm2WxJr7wEg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=O9jZjnwrKiMYwfVQRSk3KI+yL3BtAlh58nI71D4z/9JHOcN5/uixv9qyloWt3IzmWn5oXUj5s4lsYy0MShKFifT0k5UlFu+TO82pvT5kPA3j0PMXQTo35J1PnUe0qfvz/2pbZZtWnnZsHXa4Ta1LFoEjw0GLJybqlJb4SMrnq4I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Ul29YE1i; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Ul29YE1i" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1727250912; x=1758786912; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=onnuYLvkaKKSJNLqIp8eCNb0T4hkLx7Ysm2WxJr7wEg=; b=Ul29YE1iHKm89eHBTXIhVZ6lWl4zotVVgUF+dmnD/qkNjkh8sh4lVZzz MdmzWlPCYZoQScMvHINHyqlEYaQo+xn4sw8/BC5g5+9dSUMk2G3NR3MZP tDfo+WL0maQq1Qz1SGTPJYsbZLxsySQq3PYtjBkPcEiQkP5NYiUM7sW1p thOYUeuvIiGIySvV4kEoIjGBtegtXFtGHcTu4XZF1u06xlYJIp3ACAxaJ WVLf2tCOmkLG5JoZ4AC/9RW/mxARkZFIqSrpZU8TFrqM4tUQvRwnDFEi2 TNNdKN6vn912nAGu/2sYGP81ClzznqHeAfFyyDTZRsnrgYzrZbmLpnPrr w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: OpSCoiLCTNywRRwXflQb5A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: TfQeFteQSyGQIOMzvd6o/Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11205"; a="26231808" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,256,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="26231808" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Sep 2024 00:55:09 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: qWQlesjeQNm+CQ8oGSH/1g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: PFEEdDF3Q1eojZB8t1AvIA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,256,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="71837108" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 53e96f405c61) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Sep 2024 00:55:08 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 53e96f405c61 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1stMrZ-000JKd-1I; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:55:05 +0000 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 15:54:21 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Christian Marangi Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] block: add support for partition table defined in OF Message-ID: <202409251530.PSGUVk2k-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240923105937.4374-4-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240923105937.4374-4-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> Hi Christian, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on axboe-block/for-next] [also build test ERROR on robh/for-next lwn/docs-next linus/master v6.11 next-20240925] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Marangi/block-add-support-for-defining-read-only-partitions/20240923-190251 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240923105937.4374-4-ansuelsmth%40gmail.com patch subject: [RFC PATCH 3/4] block: add support for partition table defined in OF config: s390-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240925/202409251530.PSGUVk2k-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 7773243d9916f98ba0ffce0c3a960e4aa9f03e81) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240925/202409251530.PSGUVk2k-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409251530.PSGUVk2k-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from block/partitions/of.c:3: In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:9: In file included from include/linux/blk_types.h:10: In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10: In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:10: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2237: include/linux/vmstat.h:503:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 503 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 504 | item]; | ~~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:510:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 510 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 511 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:517:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 517 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:523:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 523 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 524 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from block/partitions/of.c:5: In file included from block/partitions/check.h:4: In file included from block/partitions/../blk.h:7: In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5: In file included from include/linux/io.h:14: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93: include/asm-generic/io.h:548:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 548 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:561:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 561 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' 37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16' 102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x)) | ^ In file included from block/partitions/of.c:5: In file included from block/partitions/check.h:4: In file included from block/partitions/../blk.h:7: In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5: In file included from include/linux/io.h:14: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93: include/asm-generic/io.h:574:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 574 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' 35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32' 115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x)) | ^ In file included from block/partitions/of.c:5: In file included from block/partitions/check.h:4: In file included from block/partitions/../blk.h:7: In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5: In file included from include/linux/io.h:14: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93: include/asm-generic/io.h:585:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 585 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:595:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 595 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:605:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 605 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:693:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 693 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:701:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 701 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:709:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 709 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:718:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 718 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:727:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 727 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:736:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 736 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ >> block/partitions/of.c:47:28: error: use of undeclared identifier 'pp' 47 | if (of_property_read_bool(pp, "read-only")) | ^ >> block/partitions/of.c:58:5: warning: no previous prototype for function 'of_partition' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 58 | int of_partition(struct parsed_partitions *state) | ^ block/partitions/of.c:58:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit 58 | int of_partition(struct parsed_partitions *state) | ^ | static 17 warnings and 1 error generated. vim +/pp +47 block/partitions/of.c 25 26 static void add_of_partition(struct parsed_partitions *state, int slot, 27 struct device_node *np) 28 { 29 struct partition_meta_info *info; 30 char tmp[sizeof(info->volname) + 4]; 31 int a_cells, s_cells; 32 const char *partname; 33 const __be32 *reg; 34 u64 offset, size; 35 int len; 36 37 reg = of_get_property(np, "reg", &len); 38 39 a_cells = of_n_addr_cells(np); 40 s_cells = of_n_size_cells(np); 41 42 offset = of_read_number(reg, a_cells); 43 size = of_read_number(reg + a_cells, s_cells); 44 45 put_partition(state, slot, offset, size); 46 > 47 if (of_property_read_bool(pp, "read-only")) 48 state->parts[slot].flags |= ADDPART_FLAG_READONLY; 49 50 info = &state->parts[slot].info; 51 partname = of_get_property(np, "label", &len); 52 strscpy(info->volname, partname, sizeof(info->volname)); 53 54 snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "(%s)", info->volname); 55 strlcat(state->pp_buf, tmp, PAGE_SIZE); 56 } 57 > 58 int of_partition(struct parsed_partitions *state) -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki