From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7692D64D; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 02:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729305682; cv=none; b=BpyIYZBjApXpxv9j2oiCVi6LDAwWm5lvT/lY+v243Q0mGtX3ItbkdZIF1zCzY9akfQKMwbHeElgG4qmRsG2HuKAPz/M7So/OSbbrSJkzHfAuphU5h5lhcJY+b4ksrpsT4MNsq/iujZp/3BGS+e43YSULowacr+SCFLhLbiqtE2A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729305682; c=relaxed/simple; bh=l/QXmEkRKjH5+9K00i68wlu8qyxLFVYwAdbMMEzdJy8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iwcWNT+sRsa/loIWCbxdiUJGaJE+IE63xRVU3EmciOtAlyU3vV2zsPzyskkf4/aFppx8foiowA1C8HMZ7fHkhlB/RAmn5U2TzGCpGkChU52MFyh+BE/20ZhsP7ueUVt5BcdAPnwy23/WTvWk2p3LDXS5iUlv0vc5nC/jWaN43pQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=MwFWXbT9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="MwFWXbT9" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1729305681; x=1760841681; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=l/QXmEkRKjH5+9K00i68wlu8qyxLFVYwAdbMMEzdJy8=; b=MwFWXbT9yGmYkiCyNE9JkuCw+z3oHObVEe+SqoDUKtj5f40YxKkSMqcg eCcCrmdUGDJXIfFnf04YsTani/sERl0XtA1bejtwomZIYVkwxHUF8ir9C bdtD9QNIbfNRspR+o4Zht2CRPkxpXYJzA9mLk8lw4IibJrNt3jZf93eI+ kLOXIy3I+mjsMdUV7U/USKEXy+vyaCKn06e6ZPCvpchTU88jPn1y7ORjg EsAosy/CgyiF3z0/QhpVStyvLqMLSbbjRgqGHpNdxViOMnNeJ5JKdRDk9 yHw3BOsQCAQyXvb32aES36gHBB00DUfDz6QnGYMSt149qcP7S+1/gf4JU A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: gNWOdb7iQVarfKt/uKFtVw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: tOtyB0pdTt2mBvGdTWFGfw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11222"; a="32537484" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,199,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="32537484" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Oct 2024 19:41:20 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: /egPeNXvSwOISJPtHJD1UA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: iCRBiJxjRqaoZoG9L4bYgg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,215,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="109789238" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO a48cf1aa22e8) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2024 19:41:19 -0700 Received: from kbuild by a48cf1aa22e8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1t1zP2-000OcP-1m; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 02:41:16 +0000 Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 10:40:53 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Jeremy Linton Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC 3/5] initramfs: Use existing module signing infrastructure Message-ID: <202410191016.5Ab0y2vu-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241015222235.71040-4-jeremy.linton@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241015222235.71040-4-jeremy.linton@arm.com> Hi Jeremy, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on herbert-cryptodev-2.6/master] [also build test ERROR on herbert-crypto-2.6/master akpm-mm/mm-everything linus/master v6.12-rc3 next-20241018] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jeremy-Linton/initramfs-Add-initramfs-signature-checking/20241016-062404 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/cryptodev-2.6.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241015222235.71040-4-jeremy.linton%40arm.com patch subject: [RFC 3/5] initramfs: Use existing module signing infrastructure config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241019/202410191016.5Ab0y2vu-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241019/202410191016.5Ab0y2vu-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410191016.5Ab0y2vu-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: mod_check_sig >>> referenced by initramfs.c:715 (init/initramfs.c:715) >>> vmlinux.o:(initrd_signature_check) -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki