From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BBC01BD9D9; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 01:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731030949; cv=none; b=SWr9syWmei11aeo9kj431GYrn0A/oa3wZubGvHZ/j2UOQu0gtHYQ4/ZLi6WaoQjUR5ql91ZDKOTXjeA5ygtCcIwC9KJ4JEDk6rYx5VbuRL21Jswl0AborGH49OEEchl/dsE45WmnhZm16a5qFVu/jK71dPwVd/8i0Uo77eRh560= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731030949; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nlzBpRjRUaUzfSO5CUUpdYIFv2IBxD96gDmX2RmEqkc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ijkSDWjQpYi5Avct2+Kfyu9K5N+huU8DMJJAPRUvxbkJcF+pfjVRYBIUMQGuop/ULR+wKyNBdARcObqAq1/RnaH1eYTKQ3E5A/6J22XMGJnr4eFlxcENM8oXC183PPnHLx4fb3KYvWqv+FPulYtshfeHK/VNZ/BBfFoXdqBiyGM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Ht5LUP5h; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Ht5LUP5h" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1731030949; x=1762566949; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=nlzBpRjRUaUzfSO5CUUpdYIFv2IBxD96gDmX2RmEqkc=; b=Ht5LUP5h2ZRk+1eqfgqi00FGQMexyk5Ic+foTEhdxydY30DmRU9qCXHV wz0itQM38SBF+w4/OLYHT3hRmoWS2fgVIw0ngRpQV/hBe6jR2Cbw0GciI 73seLCZ4bCpe2TBRvM//fvtr4ygjF8ouxJd1qRTejgJJaHlGQQSJrIrtF glqBJPESlDXDgEqErrKj/Eay8U1MK/9NmZGvCVCIDFP3suUiRNNKt1Wu9 /iutRI5JnXY1yvho3B6XfafxOvYJ4IUK/6vHp7WIn3M7NPigLov/IiJoY rl+ApEXtGId82fZ+VZi64aZMJ1NcDUOgQ6iQrRuEZSsTdKeyRUdOQyEhI w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: iKrbwUZQTdS9KdK/TFuy9w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Ydy0zm5IR2KzWWrnZ5iR8A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11222"; a="31072785" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,199,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="31072785" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Nov 2024 17:55:45 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: gBLhMHYsRGqPl2WuQSfmyw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: LdCUPZoFQ8W9BbKSU+nvPg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,136,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="89865671" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO a48cf1aa22e8) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2024 17:55:41 -0800 Received: from kbuild by a48cf1aa22e8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1t9EDr-000qta-0r; Fri, 08 Nov 2024 01:55:39 +0000 Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 09:54:54 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Vadim Fedorenko , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Eduard Zingerman , Thomas Gleixner , Vadim Fedorenko , Mykola Lysenko , Jakub Kicinski Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/4] bpf: add bpf_get_cpu_cycles kfunc Message-ID: <202411080939.hiAmVBIM-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241107211206.2814069-1-vadfed@meta.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241107211206.2814069-1-vadfed@meta.com> Hi Vadim, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Vadim-Fedorenko/bpf-add-bpf_cpu_cycles_to_ns-helper/20241108-051950 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241107211206.2814069-1-vadfed%40meta.com patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/4] bpf: add bpf_get_cpu_cycles kfunc config: arm-randconfig-004-20241108 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241108/202411080939.hiAmVBIM-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 592c0fe55f6d9a811028b5f3507be91458ab2713) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241108/202411080939.hiAmVBIM-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411080939.hiAmVBIM-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from kernel/bpf/helpers.c:4: In file included from include/linux/bpf.h:21: In file included from include/linux/kallsyms.h:13: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2213: include/linux/vmstat.h:518:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 518 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:117:36: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_arg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 117 | .arg2_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE | MEM_UNINIT | MEM_WRITE, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:130:36: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_arg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 130 | .arg2_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE | MEM_UNINIT | MEM_WRITE, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:541:30: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_arg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 541 | .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:544:41: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_arg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 544 | .arg4_type = ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM | MEM_UNINIT | MEM_WRITE | MEM_ALIGNED, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:569:30: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_arg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 569 | .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:572:41: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_arg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 572 | .arg4_type = ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM | MEM_UNINIT | MEM_WRITE | MEM_ALIGNED, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:585:30: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_arg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 585 | .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:655:35: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_arg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 655 | .arg4_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:727:39: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_return_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 727 | .ret_type = RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL | MEM_RDONLY, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:740:39: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_return_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 740 | .ret_type = RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID | MEM_RDONLY, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1082:30: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_arg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 1082 | .arg4_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | PTR_MAYBE_NULL | MEM_RDONLY, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1643:44: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_arg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 1643 | .arg2_type = ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL | OBJ_RELEASE, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1748:33: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_arg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 1748 | .arg4_type = ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL | MEM_UNINIT | MEM_WRITE, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1791:33: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_arg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 1791 | .arg3_type = ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | MEM_RDONLY, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1839:33: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_arg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 1839 | .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | MEM_RDONLY, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1841:30: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_arg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 1841 | .arg3_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1881:33: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_arg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 1881 | .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | MEM_RDONLY, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3029:18: warning: extra tokens at end of #ifdef directive [-Wextra-tokens] 3029 | #ifdef IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GENERIC_GETTIMEOFDAY) | ^ | // >> kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3032:9: error: call to undeclared function '__arch_get_hw_counter'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 3032 | return __arch_get_hw_counter(1, NULL); | ^ kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3128:18: warning: extra tokens at end of #ifdef directive [-Wextra-tokens] 3128 | #ifdef IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GENERIC_GETTIMEOFDAY) | ^ | // 20 warnings and 1 error generated. vim +/__arch_get_hw_counter +3032 kernel/bpf/helpers.c 3028 3029 #ifdef IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GENERIC_GETTIMEOFDAY) 3030 __bpf_kfunc u64 bpf_get_cpu_cycles(void) 3031 { > 3032 return __arch_get_hw_counter(1, NULL); 3033 } 3034 #endif 3035 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki