From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f201.google.com (mail-pl1-f201.google.com [209.85.214.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1795015534D for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 00:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738110279; cv=none; b=qSAy9xPshZsjCpxx4Vlcf12SgDlnew3hj92lP+6jWQx9W1kLMYLvqUujNkN4YVOc+zgGfIC9vreBRZr09BhGMbU0vKEL7zkMx1LTXKoOB+LBCRTpLxcqGlCBc8vtb/BsPonG+Hy7VJ4HNkCePVd44xRn4dofyHDUKpS5/e1V0cc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738110279; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Tye1ZieSPZQmo1mo8HoGA/TZnzVuj35yU1agRawQNig=; h=Date:Mime-Version:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=enIhEtkDBahrSY6UBlFlBqUtjpMwmBI6X4JI/FrHo/R4v4/X9a6C8Ut2qehDbRQ0gfC+txsn8HqlTJDe3excY9lKrIQksG1MyhehNzgZiqPFPWNFQTA+s+2YRRm3zjakWAkPqmctNA3GAsfY5CRG5T3JaF44GxP9dCqyX+UWMbo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--ctshao.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=rH9uoZh3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--ctshao.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="rH9uoZh3" Received: by mail-pl1-f201.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2167141e00eso136355195ad.2 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2025 16:24:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1738110277; x=1738715077; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ss8IRXPQuROgaPFI2n/Tn6B8Bw+CUwUeulj0ny/+twg=; b=rH9uoZh30v9I8blRhqCAXUyEDxhsSziDgA7PEbpdmwI9kW/+JLNOPsNHbTrnj2inv4 LsCqi6Ufr4x3CYfPsSh63DPMZ70QQK/FhuZrgEh85uD8EJO/LxnMRXXkZ11zqK+YUJlK U6q4816m3KvzKMAUCt8FUOkMeOprHx5RHwAIREf7Id98cMimhNJzaCYTQXBL4TQrs4YJ Sl9A0Ykb9cUIJHGNsEey7IQ99vG1shptoLQP0GCmo0SOkxIszD537zzmyiIURubZGIQy BQaLiuFA2t4KfvgOBj6wIBbsgSMrow8jUIFTjC3AauCB/1uGcsX7Z10pI62p5dNgiNLs tahg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1738110277; x=1738715077; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ss8IRXPQuROgaPFI2n/Tn6B8Bw+CUwUeulj0ny/+twg=; b=hhCJ1cA2oLm9p8lGmzKTjEc1NHe+3+SemHGap9p3Froa3OH4KLx5kBgGwXltHP+zvg BaycZl6BjPNZnfG2jWl2RvmjhbJ/YHvgtevx1SkQiMGnZslRHPB+EET9U9walR/IMQRj AKo88Spw3tcrlJiLnP1AEglQVvAjDCR86RAYXwlv+qDgKcskTzVAdvc2W4CoRHy4wZvg MfSSL32CSY+PLbU8/Og4LaXjuhdSJi+UrbaIbVPfvWtHEMiEJSct6JhyG9ycMcwxkGxc 6KnbrAYbm+C1G2CMzv7OYIv0X6c/bBQeuFHCHiuNygaNmw/FFEHiFmWV7RtP008b/ULh hcsA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCViX7+6uNlIi3DgbMTwr8ex0lQ9SNzOgGyzt1oNljbzAY2Pg6UC1LovcCi9DXzMhLoUNTLS@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwdlhsO4ROf8r5E2YVDW7e5FTwA8FsvJlDTf5GUGObZIdLjvV2f AS5pxtdQRbtMF5VeWZKQnFdnYuGaMT7/36917Y0rJ4f19WXWyN2b+B3DLqY1HpcbhAvjRM0mSkt 2Qw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IECz3VTxLM4O986OseoNSxZB/C8h78XB8HxPSOGl8b2+z2HK2SySwPs7DImzJI+zObNWYsOE+c8sYo= X-Received: from pgbcl4.prod.google.com ([2002:a05:6a02:984:b0:a88:3e2b:cada]) (user=ctshao job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a05:6a20:6a0e:b0:1e2:2e4:689a with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1ed7a6e183bmr1992091637.41.1738110277341; Tue, 28 Jan 2025 16:24:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 16:14:56 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.48.1.262.g85cc9f2d1e-goog Message-ID: <20250129001905.619859-1-ctshao@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v3 0/5] Tracing contention lock owner call stack From: Chun-Tse Shao To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Chun-Tse Shao , peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, nathan@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com, morbo@google.com, justinstitt@google.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" For perf lock contention, the current owner tracking (-o option) only works with per-thread mode (-t option). Enabling call stack mode for owner can be useful for diagnosing why a system running slow in lock contention. Example output: $ sudo ~/linux/tools/perf/perf lock con -abvo -Y mutex -E16 perf bench sched pipe ... contended total wait max wait avg wait type caller 171 1.55 ms 20.26 us 9.06 us mutex pipe_read+0x57 0xffffffffac6318e7 pipe_read+0x57 0xffffffffac623862 vfs_read+0x332 0xffffffffac62434b ksys_read+0xbb 0xfffffffface604b2 do_syscall_64+0x82 0xffffffffad00012f entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76 36 193.71 us 15.27 us 5.38 us mutex pipe_write+0x50 0xffffffffac631ee0 pipe_write+0x50 0xffffffffac6241db vfs_write+0x3bb 0xffffffffac6244ab ksys_write+0xbb 0xfffffffface604b2 do_syscall_64+0x82 0xffffffffad00012f entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76 4 51.22 us 16.47 us 12.80 us mutex do_epoll_wait+0x24d 0xffffffffac691f0d do_epoll_wait+0x24d 0xffffffffac69249b do_epoll_pwait.part.0+0xb 0xffffffffac693ba5 __x64_sys_epoll_pwait+0x95 0xfffffffface604b2 do_syscall_64+0x82 0xffffffffad00012f entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76 2 20.88 us 11.95 us 10.44 us mutex do_epoll_wait+0x24d 0xffffffffac691f0d do_epoll_wait+0x24d 0xffffffffac693943 __x64_sys_epoll_wait+0x73 0xfffffffface604b2 do_syscall_64+0x82 0xffffffffad00012f entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76 1 7.33 us 7.33 us 7.33 us mutex do_epoll_ctl+0x6c1 0xffffffffac692e01 do_epoll_ctl+0x6c1 0xffffffffac6937e0 __x64_sys_epoll_ctl+0x70 0xfffffffface604b2 do_syscall_64+0x82 0xffffffffad00012f entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76 1 6.64 us 6.64 us 6.64 us mutex do_epoll_ctl+0x3d4 0xffffffffac692b14 do_epoll_ctl+0x3d4 0xffffffffac6937e0 __x64_sys_epoll_ctl+0x70 0xfffffffface604b2 do_syscall_64+0x82 0xffffffffad00012f entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76 === owner stack trace === 3 31.24 us 15.27 us 10.41 us mutex pipe_read+0x348 0xffffffffac631bd8 pipe_read+0x348 0xffffffffac623862 vfs_read+0x332 0xffffffffac62434b ksys_read+0xbb 0xfffffffface604b2 do_syscall_64+0x82 0xffffffffad00012f entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76 ... v3: Edit based on Namhyung's review. v2: Fix logic deficit in patch 2/4. Chun-Tse Shao (4): perf lock: Add bpf maps for owner stack tracing perf lock: Retrieve owner callstack in bpf program perf lock: Make rb_tree helper functions generic perf lock: Report owner stack in usermode Chun-Tse Shao (5): perf lock: Add bpf maps for owner stack tracing perf lock: Retrieve owner callstack in bpf program perf lock: Make rb_tree helper functions generic perf lock: Report owner stack in usermode perf lock: Update documentation for -o option in contention mode tools/perf/builtin-lock.c | 60 +++- tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c | 70 ++++- .../perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c | 277 +++++++++++++++++- tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_data.h | 7 + tools/perf/util/lock-contention.h | 7 + 5 files changed, 398 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) -- 2.48.1.262.g85cc9f2d1e-goog