From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0915B20B807; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 18:10:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738606207; cv=none; b=ABm8M4FaC9FT9hw4EESWJfYmF8moowlqKgwrK34oVqx3+JtoHBWvaeC+VV7Q7MTSOrFiTrCedYvNapVvFLmXgIxE04rZktPTjkK1SN7L47Gcx4JdvbZ8A+3g4OFtT0adVoZUImse9uLGkFI9jMl34Qjzwp6RF3fYFGWe8EBKkn8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738606207; c=relaxed/simple; bh=q1Kbi2EJdIymVySMSKbRjoMRaL6sIwEq9pikodfhdLk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ua4aNxISJ6TJCLBCuSzDLNurw5Z9hyal1/zLEEQ2cWMvKtIq7wdskWYnhMezNaedDwHTNJlbO3ccGeDaaj/OjDGS86tKmPNSwCvBQAERsN1UCog6AcnOXtj9Dkhd4SCKh50LMkM10mvFMa5QP3bmnOuEaojM5wWHbKiK0RSecGk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=X42HS4Ww; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="X42HS4Ww" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1738606206; x=1770142206; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=q1Kbi2EJdIymVySMSKbRjoMRaL6sIwEq9pikodfhdLk=; b=X42HS4Ww9iGwtIZWAA7bJqUhiXz3X7tdsCJIz4RlWWCmi+tRGKEd2JdK 523TWAgd7xzclZwqxLQpjmb0mUgEiFUhQ/eQ0YnyGbPk5Pyg7xZZQ4/CG C7grGUbCN0JHlVyqnCrPq6Fzapc+3LgrJAhX9ZsKNVpKxUApqGxmokMg+ yl4jLXDDcvB/yZyQBQ/JuQZsLW20uByVKK5GXY2KgEGXDDIfg0MMCK4yu pvGbxU3bP4kPO32BYPkzauPUBMhWrfci2tY+NPZTacosQ32GKgngNqXVw 92wwEvs3lOmnTcbUtGWmLJRvolBkbhKyqyyoEDRX9dKZNo86kfSAlr1l9 A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: yErREJJGTe6/rNPLCM8EWg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9V3FPFuaQ8+2Wib078UKQw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11335"; a="38988855" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,256,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="38988855" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2025 10:10:05 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: BNo5rWpdQOao6yJ9RLG9Aw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9TJGpjSUS2qiRTP+06bScw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="111206876" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d63d4d77d921) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2025 10:10:02 -0800 Received: from kbuild by d63d4d77d921 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tf0tU-000rIx-0N; Mon, 03 Feb 2025 18:10:00 +0000 Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 02:08:57 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: "Naveen N Rao (AMD)" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Vasant Hegde Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: SVM: Limit AVIC physical max index based on configured max_vcpu_ids Message-ID: <202502040135.UzvbMEPC-lkp@intel.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Naveen, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on eb723766b1030a23c38adf2348b7c3d1409d11f0] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Naveen-N-Rao-AMD/KVM-SVM-Increase-X2AVIC-limit-to-4096-vcpus/20250203-144127 base: eb723766b1030a23c38adf2348b7c3d1409d11f0 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b79610c60de53048f3fda942fd45973c4ab1de97.1738563890.git.naveen%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: SVM: Limit AVIC physical max index based on configured max_vcpu_ids config: x86_64-randconfig-008-20250203 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250204/202502040135.UzvbMEPC-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250204/202502040135.UzvbMEPC-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502040135.UzvbMEPC-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c:20: In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:16: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2223: include/linux/vmstat.h:518:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 518 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c:88:66: error: expected ')' 88 | static inline u32 avic_get_max_physical_id(struct kvm *kvm, bool x2apic_mode) | ^ arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h:258:23: note: expanded from macro 'x2apic_mode' 258 | #define x2apic_mode (0) | ^ arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c:88:66: note: to match this '(' arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h:258:22: note: expanded from macro 'x2apic_mode' 258 | #define x2apic_mode (0) | ^ >> arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c:88:66: warning: omitting the parameter name in a function definition is a C23 extension [-Wc23-extensions] 88 | static inline u32 avic_get_max_physical_id(struct kvm *kvm, bool x2apic_mode) | ^ arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h:258:23: note: expanded from macro 'x2apic_mode' 258 | #define x2apic_mode (0) | ^ 2 warnings and 1 error generated. vim +88 arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c 87 > 88 static inline u32 avic_get_max_physical_id(struct kvm *kvm, bool x2apic_mode) 89 { 90 u32 avic_max_physical_id = x2apic_mode ? x2avic_max_physical_id : AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID; 91 92 /* 93 * Assume vcpu_id is the same as APIC ID. Per KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID, max_vcpu_ids 94 * represents the max APIC ID for this vm, rather than the max vcpus. 95 */ 96 return min(kvm->arch.max_vcpu_ids - 1, avic_max_physical_id); 97 } 98 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki