From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 962EE154BFE; Sat, 8 Feb 2025 05:48:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738993695; cv=none; b=jVULCSKdVasSiYjYPMJnjPLxG63gox3OB98syBUVhJyxqokJhlisc2bNbBfE7mEdBBvaIxS+zBM+aibmyJ2/vLkbhWZPH5K194wewpEWtaFPabNGjhnLOlYqP36/5H1xgHeKnHAfqn7/1JLIdALOpcrRMlOeGsZ4J6BSbTY2IZU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738993695; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wA0BmDz21/8I4MOZeMPRdJ8DIn6Tlt/iSbPznwlMASM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=q8bFMS07fRJRnJRO0GaBzetYX97stEbgIw3bHFmETMpVEkkna5kRtlq4xyZoGx+71snWB6qwI6gJqE1IfxQsDrkybPT5FvlU1YgLlao7+CA+hv5LEL54to2S6+AX6AizYpVQnCGoVkR1HsXns49HJJuCvE3tyDtNacy5soCSzAM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Ako5oNk4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Ako5oNk4" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1738993694; x=1770529694; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=wA0BmDz21/8I4MOZeMPRdJ8DIn6Tlt/iSbPznwlMASM=; b=Ako5oNk40zOGNe2HMDzZEauvdM9SwvsbpfEDiWOldrqk8zGMfULvoCxi c21VL3uZV/MZfctv8g2Wk+ZhK3MVcSW37yT7L5cg6MbjPgSbBsYt4SW0J qKTPvCX5gi+NySTaxsYmyk5lHphKcexMxpo2vaKs9G5a1g461YWrotKJo H+z6CDxjY+TqYK32CLLKPmUWZVaPgQ6tVR6mEOTMD54ca2GfHRHaWNuZK QcB0l+ujUqGpZxuUWZwzhVoC/t9Zi3nJ2ZrZKAv7fd9I6Jsc2IXfIpDAN 2MBl75JjeYhp18VyfqKaJ3iDTkZ1o91rMXjlSwI5vH9gSET1JCgw0KtRF A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2BhitZFJRvGq4usX9n+EOA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: +vkSkU2mSzyDYLMoknGWQA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11338"; a="51028438" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,269,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="51028438" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Feb 2025 21:48:13 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: HWU+sQIMQp6QzNwU1gmo2w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: IxhBp/1ZRTuYG0obpJ0Qcg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="134955066" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d63d4d77d921) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2025 21:48:07 -0800 Received: from kbuild by d63d4d77d921 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tgdhF-000zbT-0b; Sat, 08 Feb 2025 05:48:05 +0000 Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 13:48:00 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Jie Gan , Suzuki K Poulose , Mike Leach , James Clark , Alexander Shishkin , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Tingwei Zhang , Jinlong Mao , coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/7] Coresight: Introduce a new struct coresight_path Message-ID: <202502081313.JqJlff9y-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250207064213.2314482-5-quic_jiegan@quicinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250207064213.2314482-5-quic_jiegan@quicinc.com> Hi Jie, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next] [also build test WARNING on atorgue-stm32/stm32-next linus/master v6.14-rc1 next-20250207] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jie-Gan/Coresight-Add-support-for-new-APB-clock-name/20250207-144657 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250207064213.2314482-5-quic_jiegan%40quicinc.com patch subject: [PATCH v10 4/7] Coresight: Introduce a new struct coresight_path config: arm-randconfig-002-20250208 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250208/202502081313.JqJlff9y-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250208/202502081313.JqJlff9y-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502081313.JqJlff9y-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c:659: warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst * Links or sources will read their existing or alloc a trace ID, if their ID drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c:676: warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst * Call this after creating the path and before enabling it. This leaves vim +659 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c 657 658 /** > 659 * Links or sources will read their existing or alloc a trace ID, if their ID 660 * callback is set. 661 */ 662 static int coresight_get_trace_id(struct coresight_device *csdev, 663 enum cs_mode mode, 664 struct coresight_device *sink) 665 { 666 if (csdev->type == CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_LINK && link_ops(csdev)->trace_id) 667 return link_ops(csdev)->trace_id(csdev, mode, sink); 668 669 if (csdev->type == CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SOURCE && source_ops(csdev)->trace_id) 670 return source_ops(csdev)->trace_id(csdev, mode, sink); 671 672 return 0; 673 } 674 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki