From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f74.google.com (mail-wr1-f74.google.com [209.85.221.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEBCD1FFC6A for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.74 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741080340; cv=none; b=Jr174WOPf32Y1JtA/lqa2XLOI7HJoQE7zBfAsvwUxWN8Aq0BWnkkk18hbxsyo5x7wdkeltBfiBme5A7djzKgve616n3L0a3CGNy2mXn2/a6UASEvfqjZMSA9sBmnWcxmKz6RlG+L3a5iYqAaoSjt0m4NOA8lkht3CBTRogcDyXA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741080340; c=relaxed/simple; bh=R7NfOr2i/sd1rk+XA1fxYV0VoUux4hyfMe10hs/GFIo=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=Tsgce7HdUD+DzywlGcDq/KWH4rZW1zAOS0Z1gD4t2HZ15OcrnBrwzFjav/hYrrHlLeokV596U5Xup1R9xU9zv/doKnHWTr9iayUhRSEFbey2M9j43FSixFLc0Xe+1Z0k2sw/OkcdIenUXuzPWH+w/LIBZbyPrfrOnEt8OKcIens= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--elver.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=DWqg0MWv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.74 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--elver.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="DWqg0MWv" Received: by mail-wr1-f74.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-390f365274dso1583602f8f.0 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 01:25:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1741080336; x=1741685136; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=istr0KCQ5s77c/egqf7KkvIi9CTO4kygD0ofOymfkU8=; b=DWqg0MWvWBGyewAbHnnXE7GiNx6pG1vmSY26rxv4rbpHS6nLBb3M3y5+PE/Hgsfwym iMhcae3M1JDif0gipdt9cRWRNrgOtNrUBWGBHj3nMqvudAQa74ZGsUu437BBA9Z5JhCc vD4fDxgcz/OsNWwA9JyoYDuCcSDjjSbBRaHMBhml9bn2rPzK4ja+dOYrjabhs+P3u2r3 asJSX+NzGJh9zC6lT3Q7tsmoOTDymJMAEtBJFgZ/RQC8cdzRH0yMys0I9hggP3xWoNpZ KxfyQW6JK7f2xHrdaukci5+F1BiqGJMHuDZxtJZIiMdF+QGi//mg6N0f6fs4iL6v6GGX m45w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1741080336; x=1741685136; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=istr0KCQ5s77c/egqf7KkvIi9CTO4kygD0ofOymfkU8=; b=G203HO7srdLb4VUS2E1i5C+4f5CLdj+IO7mIT1lyw5ThHuMKclsFDPKt9m1NbBV040 eDMUBJ0q++Rd5IyeltgAyBhdH9ZSjlalev4WPIDxJptY95Tt3Hw2VCGNgzyoC88bMwqN //z4CwtJhufVhhrCLN+n4W21WK+hzIzFNpgxLzzFjKvTtNjEwG1vW2+x6VXZhbQSRpAL 1LFjKDLZDyrVUEt5ByU33KwqvwjS8MYk6E3YVOwjDYlSL9mTiQPbxK2uQgBpSFDY8EdW qLZO5NHnHFB1AKQM+TBBVZ0j9bUD6PepBInteSjhScIURSzClpZbYKlSPkkdkxs/ocUg weRw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXqIQ9T68oKo9q20YW26YccDrYevnu31vuKiQ3uLXo++EN0aS1UH0DmsSF+S0QGot9sH6cj@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxcEzcwtyDm89Y4nKgB6AHgPhjZ3ixApFr30EQCVbOoKLJatcxO zaQIeFUG9EW9xeUlDiqyFWd3VIp/MM+ut/l/nVkY3NnqHTjA1pYjV3VXBJPDd4F3yfQzyMd7Iw= = X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEWpumMq7w2Do+3aHW1xJk7ZnkmrsU/t6znrys5DihZ08Xs8NOd+ecssoGGAfkjsqWUcHoulWJrMg== X-Received: from wrbei4.prod.google.com ([2002:a05:6000:4184:b0:390:f69f:8c34]) (user=elver job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a05:6000:1fa4:b0:390:f9e0:f0d0 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-391155feb2emr1821321f8f.6.1741080335989; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 01:25:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 10:21:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20250304092417.2873893-1-elver@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20250304092417.2873893-1-elver@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.48.1.711.g2feabab25a-goog Message-ID: <20250304092417.2873893-11-elver@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 10/34] locking/mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis From: Marco Elver To: elver@google.com Cc: "David S. Miller" , Luc Van Oostenryck , "Paul E. McKenney" , Alexander Potapenko , Arnd Bergmann , Bart Van Assche , Bill Wendling , Boqun Feng , Dmitry Vyukov , Eric Dumazet , Frederic Weisbecker , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Herbert Xu , Ingo Molnar , Jann Horn , Jiri Slaby , Joel Fernandes , Jonathan Corbet , Josh Triplett , Justin Stitt , Kees Cook , Kentaro Takeda , Mark Rutland , Mathieu Desnoyers , Miguel Ojeda , Nathan Chancellor , Neeraj Upadhyay , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Tetsuo Handa , Thomas Gleixner , Uladzislau Rezki , Waiman Long , Will Deacon , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Add support for Clang's capability analysis for mutex. Signed-off-by: Marco Elver --- .../dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst | 2 +- include/linux/mutex.h | 29 +++++---- include/linux/mutex_types.h | 4 +- lib/test_capability-analysis.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst index ddda3dc0d8d3..0000214056c2 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Supported Kernel Primitives ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Currently the following synchronization primitives are supported: -`raw_spinlock_t`, `spinlock_t`, `rwlock_t`. +`raw_spinlock_t`, `spinlock_t`, `rwlock_t`, `mutex`. For capabilities with an initialization function (e.g., `spin_lock_init()`), calling this function on the capability instance before initializing any diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h index 2bf91b57591b..f71ad9ec96d0 100644 --- a/include/linux/mutex.h +++ b/include/linux/mutex.h @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ do { \ static struct lock_class_key __key; \ \ __mutex_init((mutex), #mutex, &__key); \ + __assert_cap(mutex); \ } while (0) /** @@ -154,14 +155,14 @@ static inline int __devm_mutex_init(struct device *dev, struct mutex *lock) * Also see Documentation/locking/mutex-design.rst. */ #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC -extern void mutex_lock_nested(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int subclass); +extern void mutex_lock_nested(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int subclass) __acquires(lock); extern void _mutex_lock_nest_lock(struct mutex *lock, struct lockdep_map *nest_lock); extern int __must_check mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(struct mutex *lock, - unsigned int subclass); + unsigned int subclass) __cond_acquires(0, lock); extern int __must_check mutex_lock_killable_nested(struct mutex *lock, - unsigned int subclass); -extern void mutex_lock_io_nested(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int subclass); + unsigned int subclass) __cond_acquires(0, lock); +extern void mutex_lock_io_nested(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int subclass) __acquires(lock); #define mutex_lock(lock) mutex_lock_nested(lock, 0) #define mutex_lock_interruptible(lock) mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(lock, 0) @@ -175,10 +176,10 @@ do { \ } while (0) #else -extern void mutex_lock(struct mutex *lock); -extern int __must_check mutex_lock_interruptible(struct mutex *lock); -extern int __must_check mutex_lock_killable(struct mutex *lock); -extern void mutex_lock_io(struct mutex *lock); +extern void mutex_lock(struct mutex *lock) __acquires(lock); +extern int __must_check mutex_lock_interruptible(struct mutex *lock) __cond_acquires(0, lock); +extern int __must_check mutex_lock_killable(struct mutex *lock) __cond_acquires(0, lock); +extern void mutex_lock_io(struct mutex *lock) __acquires(lock); # define mutex_lock_nested(lock, subclass) mutex_lock(lock) # define mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(lock, subclass) mutex_lock_interruptible(lock) @@ -193,13 +194,13 @@ extern void mutex_lock_io(struct mutex *lock); * * Returns 1 if the mutex has been acquired successfully, and 0 on contention. */ -extern int mutex_trylock(struct mutex *lock); -extern void mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lock); +extern int mutex_trylock(struct mutex *lock) __cond_acquires(true, lock); +extern void mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lock) __releases(lock); -extern int atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(atomic_t *cnt, struct mutex *lock); +extern int atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(atomic_t *cnt, struct mutex *lock) __cond_acquires(true, lock); -DEFINE_GUARD(mutex, struct mutex *, mutex_lock(_T), mutex_unlock(_T)) -DEFINE_GUARD_COND(mutex, _try, mutex_trylock(_T)) -DEFINE_GUARD_COND(mutex, _intr, mutex_lock_interruptible(_T) == 0) +DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(mutex, struct mutex, mutex_lock(_T->lock), mutex_unlock(_T->lock)) +DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND(mutex, _try, mutex_trylock(_T->lock)) +DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND(mutex, _intr, mutex_lock_interruptible(_T->lock) == 0) #endif /* __LINUX_MUTEX_H */ diff --git a/include/linux/mutex_types.h b/include/linux/mutex_types.h index fdf7f515fde8..e1a5ea12d53c 100644 --- a/include/linux/mutex_types.h +++ b/include/linux/mutex_types.h @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ * - detects multi-task circular deadlocks and prints out all affected * locks and tasks (and only those tasks) */ -struct mutex { +struct_with_capability(mutex) { atomic_long_t owner; raw_spinlock_t wait_lock; #ifdef CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ struct mutex { */ #include -struct mutex { +struct_with_capability(mutex) { struct rt_mutex_base rtmutex; #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC struct lockdep_map dep_map; diff --git a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c index 84060bace61d..286723b47328 100644 --- a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c +++ b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ */ #include +#include #include /* @@ -144,3 +145,66 @@ TEST_SPINLOCK_COMMON(read_lock, read_unlock, read_trylock, TEST_OP_RO); + +struct test_mutex_data { + struct mutex mtx; + int counter __guarded_by(&mtx); +}; + +static void __used test_mutex_init(struct test_mutex_data *d) +{ + mutex_init(&d->mtx); + d->counter = 0; +} + +static void __used test_mutex_lock(struct test_mutex_data *d) +{ + mutex_lock(&d->mtx); + d->counter++; + mutex_unlock(&d->mtx); + mutex_lock_io(&d->mtx); + d->counter++; + mutex_unlock(&d->mtx); +} + +static void __used test_mutex_trylock(struct test_mutex_data *d, atomic_t *a) +{ + if (!mutex_lock_interruptible(&d->mtx)) { + d->counter++; + mutex_unlock(&d->mtx); + } + if (!mutex_lock_killable(&d->mtx)) { + d->counter++; + mutex_unlock(&d->mtx); + } + if (mutex_trylock(&d->mtx)) { + d->counter++; + mutex_unlock(&d->mtx); + } + if (atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(a, &d->mtx)) { + d->counter++; + mutex_unlock(&d->mtx); + } +} + +static void __used test_mutex_assert(struct test_mutex_data *d) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&d->mtx); + d->counter++; +} + +static void __used test_mutex_guard(struct test_mutex_data *d) +{ + guard(mutex)(&d->mtx); + d->counter++; +} + +static void __used test_mutex_cond_guard(struct test_mutex_data *d) +{ + scoped_cond_guard(mutex_try, return, &d->mtx) { + d->counter++; + } + scoped_cond_guard(mutex_intr, return, &d->mtx) { + d->counter++; + } +} -- 2.48.1.711.g2feabab25a-goog