From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] string fixes for v6.15-rc1
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 14:01:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250407210157.GA583041@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wiQgK1ciFurQcHib8gF5oD8ZrWOaCPLDNLn=7ZvkF4=mQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 01:25:04PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I think if unconditionally works, that's probably the best option
> simply because it's the simplest option.
>
> But I don't see 'wcslen' in the gcc docs, which was why I was assuming
> it wanted that "check if it works" thing with "$(call cc-option,...)"
It appears that neither gcc nor clang warn for "invalid" libcall values
to '-fno-builtin-*':
$ echo 'int main(void) { return 0; }' | clang -fno-builtin-ireallydonotexist -o /dev/null -S -x c -
$ echo 'int main(void) { return 0; }' | gcc -fno-builtin-ireallydonotexist -o /dev/null -S -x c -
> I don't think we need to call out the particular compiler, since the
> argument against using it is not compiler-specific per se.
Sounds good, I will ultimately make this:
# Ensure compilers do not transform certain loops into calls to wcslen()
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-builtin-wcslen
Cheers,
Nathan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <202504061053.F27227CA@keescook>
[not found] ` <CAHk-=whVfxi4KRu-H=tsgSdoGdDz1bvu0_miJT0BTgAf4igpdg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <FFE5FB0B-CC92-4A25-8014-E7548AD1C469@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <CAHk-=wijG2dSOOFr8CCYygwxZQxdTUj73rfB8=tyZP-3G-8-og@mail.gmail.com>
2025-04-07 17:37 ` [GIT PULL] string fixes for v6.15-rc1 Nathan Chancellor
2025-04-07 19:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-04-07 19:25 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-04-07 20:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-04-07 21:01 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250407210157.GA583041@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox