From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F2EF148832; Wed, 7 May 2025 09:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746608484; cv=none; b=SIihKiNK9wNOlA0Tg3j+AWfI4l8/RPXvQyEtMA+s4r+534uDLoPQyanvIYg+yDUhSDMlVxGHcmaRPYuLCByYS8Ne9uF2K1waK6O3lSNe1dIir+SLAUSBVMnKcky4ThMAxjREyCtfc1TXyc0Zy2kkPRsHWF68nKTjJhtivKkwsH4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746608484; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cB1ssunMZ2hnfS0Tfp2M5BYgWLLpSS38QwQRDoJmO3I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=l63BzZT+EPjR29N/4A1HX9MffSmOwpKlPIr9xzzSwHbRx69fyJNC1mbYQ3qGSS3P2y2ZP/+kO8PDJ57dZoZ+XnteM+2SkGEIUJG6dMKJWOhWs+a+H04eEvCg6pm5cY6gkFHU9ebistu85NF7r2JCd/AZ9d3+VEzyYMFL/Fh16LY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=AWwH1HXa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="AWwH1HXa" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1746608482; x=1778144482; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=cB1ssunMZ2hnfS0Tfp2M5BYgWLLpSS38QwQRDoJmO3I=; b=AWwH1HXaHWlp5mv0xMefCp8vdRiYj8UZgMLJ4qg/zus6Oq/OlPbTouxc VxTF5l0ilH4djU2SRFIfMRp1tHhHB+XRQjTvYfnECQ9Hh1Bj+m2C3jZuD JiAQlEz2HymrChOPI8XFG1WJ1OBR6yISjJBNaT1FULE7shufIKUzIC4Qc 9ko2vsfiOfufFxOAJhODez104QhCorc5Yw8Sfp7QWe1Bv9vMJH+t5NTb0 EJr7zdqcVj4QZYPZ2Ilj82rQ7dgr65iFJmxpkGX6XkRSrMGI/ZEttsWSz atuj6duEPDLxz7Uaj+zQgWAoeazE0vKtouQ7kbcXNaVYAVkHyJhjGcdch g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: R5b0THQlQLCpRD8CPonzyg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: /RbIRhBAQCi472VgrB2+gQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11425"; a="73716008" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,268,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="73716008" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 May 2025 02:01:22 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: oolfkHEQQBSOTa3kJD4hTQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: C7JJUk5AStaZPWiev+WPgA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,268,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="135797172" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 1992f890471c) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 May 2025 02:01:21 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 1992f890471c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uCaeT-0007SL-1r; Wed, 07 May 2025 09:01:17 +0000 Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 17:01:09 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Jeff Layton Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: [jlayton:nfs-client-leak 2/8] fs/nfs/pnfs.c:565:30: error: no member named 'pls_tracker' in 'struct pnfs_layout_segment' Message-ID: <202505071627.0GqP7WYb-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jlayton/linux.git nfs-client-leak head: 6af305fb6b4bb0b9b5330286b4c66daf076b1145 commit: e805e02639509963455233d10a03edf7cbd38ee9 [2/8] nfs: add refcount tracking to pnfs_layout_segment config: arm-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250507/202505071627.0GqP7WYb-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 21.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f819f46284f2a79790038e1f6649172789734ae8) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250507/202505071627.0GqP7WYb-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505071627.0GqP7WYb-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> fs/nfs/pnfs.c:565:30: error: no member named 'pls_tracker' in 'struct pnfs_layout_segment' 565 | ref_tracker_dir_init(&lseg->pls_tracker, 128, "pnfs_layout_segment"); | ~~~~ ^ fs/nfs/pnfs.c:573:31: error: no member named 'pls_tracker' in 'struct pnfs_layout_segment' 573 | ref_tracker_dir_exit(&lseg->pls_tracker); | ~~~~ ^ fs/nfs/pnfs.c:2599:30: error: no member named 'pls_tracker' in 'struct pnfs_layout_segment' 2599 | ref_tracker_dir_exit(&lseg->pls_tracker); | ~~~~ ^ 3 errors generated. vim +565 fs/nfs/pnfs.c 551 552 static void 553 pnfs_init_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg, 554 const struct pnfs_layout_range *range, 555 const nfs4_stateid *stateid) 556 { 557 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lseg->pls_list); 558 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lseg->pls_lc_list); 559 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lseg->pls_commits); 560 refcount_set(&lseg->pls_refcount, 1); 561 set_bit(NFS_LSEG_VALID, &lseg->pls_flags); 562 lseg->pls_layout = lo; 563 lseg->pls_range = *range; 564 lseg->pls_seq = be32_to_cpu(stateid->seqid); > 565 ref_tracker_dir_init(&lseg->pls_tracker, 128, "pnfs_layout_segment"); 566 } 567 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki