From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Remi Denis-Courmont <courmisch@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: -Wuninitialized-const-pointer in net/phonet/pep.c
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 13:16:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250715201637.GA2104822@ax162> (raw)
Hi all,
A new warning in clang [1] points out that dst is not initialized when
passed to pep_find_pipe() in pep_sock_accept():
net/phonet/pep.c:829:37: error: variable 'dst' is uninitialized when passed as a const pointer argument here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized-const-pointer]
829 | newsk = pep_find_pipe(&pn->hlist, &dst, pipe_handle);
| ^~~
It looks like this was introduced by commit f7ae8d59f661 ("Phonet:
allocate sock from accept syscall rather than soft IRQ") if I understand
correctly. Prior to that change, both calls to pep_find_pipe() were in
the same function with pn_skb_get_dst_sockaddr(skb, &dst) before them,
so dst would always be initialized. Should pn_skb_get_dst_sockaddr() be
called before pep_find_pipe() in pep_sock_accept() as well or is there
some other fix for this? I am not familiar with this code, hence the
inquiry.
[1]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/00dacf8c22f065cb52efb14cd091d441f19b319e
Cheers,
Nathan
next reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-15 20:16 Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2025-07-15 22:14 ` -Wuninitialized-const-pointer in net/phonet/pep.c Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250715201637.GA2104822@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=courmisch@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).