llvm.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] ACPI: CPPC: add perf control read API and clarify naming
       [not found] <20250823200121.1320197-2-sumitg@nvidia.com>
@ 2025-08-25 23:41 ` kernel test robot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-08-25 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sumit Gupta, rafael, viresh.kumar, lenb, robert.moore, corbet,
	pierre.gondois, zhenglifeng1, ray.huang, gautham.shenoy,
	mario.limonciello, perry.yuan, linux-pm, linux-acpi, linux-doc,
	acpica-devel, linux-kernel
  Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, linux-tegra, treding, jonathanh, vsethi,
	ksitaraman, sanjayc, bbasu, sumitg

Hi Sumit,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on rafael-pm/bleeding-edge linus/master v6.17-rc3 next-20250825]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sumit-Gupta/ACPI-CPPC-add-perf-control-read-API-and-clarify-naming/20250824-040531
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250823200121.1320197-2-sumitg%40nvidia.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] ACPI: CPPC: add perf control read API and clarify naming
config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250826/202508260711.I7imWLTG-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250826/202508260711.I7imWLTG-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202508260711.I7imWLTG-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c:524:8: error: call to undeclared function 'cppc_set_perf'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     524 |         ret = cppc_set_perf(cpudata->cpu, &perf_ctrls);
         |               ^
   drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c:524:8: note: did you mean 'cppc_set_epp'?
   include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h:170:12: note: 'cppc_set_epp' declared here
     170 | extern int cppc_set_epp(int cpu, u64 epp_val);
         |            ^
   1 error generated.


vim +/cppc_set_perf +524 drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c

e059c184da47e9 Huang Rui         2021-12-24  480  
77fbea69b0ffad Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  481  static int shmem_update_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, u8 min_perf,
555bbe67a622b2 Dhananjay Ugwekar 2025-02-05  482  			     u8 des_perf, u8 max_perf, u8 epp, bool fast_switch)
e059c184da47e9 Huang Rui         2021-12-24  483  {
77fbea69b0ffad Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  484  	struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = policy->driver_data;
e059c184da47e9 Huang Rui         2021-12-24  485  	struct cppc_perf_ctrls perf_ctrls;
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  486  	u64 value, prev;
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  487  	int ret;
e059c184da47e9 Huang Rui         2021-12-24  488  
fff395796917ac Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  489  	if (cppc_state == AMD_PSTATE_ACTIVE) {
77fbea69b0ffad Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  490  		int ret = shmem_set_epp(policy, epp);
fff395796917ac Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  491  
fff395796917ac Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  492  		if (ret)
fff395796917ac Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  493  			return ret;
fff395796917ac Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  494  	}
fff395796917ac Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  495  
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  496  	value = prev = READ_ONCE(cpudata->cppc_req_cached);
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  497  
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  498  	value &= ~(AMD_CPPC_MAX_PERF_MASK | AMD_CPPC_MIN_PERF_MASK |
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  499  		   AMD_CPPC_DES_PERF_MASK | AMD_CPPC_EPP_PERF_MASK);
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  500  	value |= FIELD_PREP(AMD_CPPC_MAX_PERF_MASK, max_perf);
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  501  	value |= FIELD_PREP(AMD_CPPC_DES_PERF_MASK, des_perf);
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  502  	value |= FIELD_PREP(AMD_CPPC_MIN_PERF_MASK, min_perf);
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  503  	value |= FIELD_PREP(AMD_CPPC_EPP_PERF_MASK, epp);
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  504  
77fbea69b0ffad Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  505  	if (trace_amd_pstate_epp_perf_enabled()) {
77fbea69b0ffad Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  506  		union perf_cached perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->perf);
77fbea69b0ffad Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  507  
77fbea69b0ffad Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  508  		trace_amd_pstate_epp_perf(cpudata->cpu,
77fbea69b0ffad Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  509  					  perf.highest_perf,
77fbea69b0ffad Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  510  					  epp,
77fbea69b0ffad Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  511  					  min_perf,
77fbea69b0ffad Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  512  					  max_perf,
77fbea69b0ffad Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  513  					  policy->boost_enabled,
77fbea69b0ffad Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  514  					  value != prev);
77fbea69b0ffad Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  515  	}
77fbea69b0ffad Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  516  
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  517  	if (value == prev)
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  518  		return 0;
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  519  
e059c184da47e9 Huang Rui         2021-12-24  520  	perf_ctrls.max_perf = max_perf;
e059c184da47e9 Huang Rui         2021-12-24  521  	perf_ctrls.min_perf = min_perf;
e059c184da47e9 Huang Rui         2021-12-24  522  	perf_ctrls.desired_perf = des_perf;
e059c184da47e9 Huang Rui         2021-12-24  523  
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09 @524  	ret = cppc_set_perf(cpudata->cpu, &perf_ctrls);
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  525  	if (ret)
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  526  		return ret;
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  527  
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  528  	WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->cppc_req_cached, value);
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  529  
9f5daa2f2f6ddd Mario Limonciello 2024-12-09  530  	return 0;
e059c184da47e9 Huang Rui         2021-12-24  531  }
e059c184da47e9 Huang Rui         2021-12-24  532  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-08-25 23:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20250823200121.1320197-2-sumitg@nvidia.com>
2025-08-25 23:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] ACPI: CPPC: add perf control read API and clarify naming kernel test robot

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).