From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: [arm-perf:for-next/perf 6/8] drivers/perf/arm-ni.c:433:13: warning: operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'; '+' will be evaluated first
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 17:43:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202511041749.ok8zDP6u-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git for-next/perf
head: 989b40b7578a2be7b0388522d33d751b257d59d9
commit: 8fa08f8835e57e1fd5e2994c9cf76c84dadc1235 [6/8] perf/arm-ni: Add NoC S3 support
config: sparc64-randconfig-002-20251104 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251104/202511041749.ok8zDP6u-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project d2625a438020ad35330cda29c3def102c1687b1b)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251104/202511041749.ok8zDP6u-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511041749.ok8zDP6u-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/perf/arm-ni.c:433:13: warning: operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'; '+' will be evaluated first [-Wparentheses]
432 | hw->event_base = (unsigned long)cd->pmu_base +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
433 | is_7xx ? NI700_PMCCNTR_L : NI_PMCCNTR_L;
| ~~~~~~ ^
drivers/perf/arm-ni.c:433:13: note: place parentheses around the '+' expression to silence this warning
432 | hw->event_base = (unsigned long)cd->pmu_base +
| (
433 | is_7xx ? NI700_PMCCNTR_L : NI_PMCCNTR_L;
| ^
| )
drivers/perf/arm-ni.c:433:13: note: place parentheses around the '?:' expression to evaluate it first
433 | is_7xx ? NI700_PMCCNTR_L : NI_PMCCNTR_L;
| ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm-ni.c:446:13: warning: operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'; '+' will be evaluated first [-Wparentheses]
445 | hw->event_base = (unsigned long)cd->pmu_base +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
446 | is_7xx ? NI700_PMEVCNTR(hw->idx) : NI_PMEVCNTR(hw->idx);
| ~~~~~~ ^
drivers/perf/arm-ni.c:446:13: note: place parentheses around the '+' expression to silence this warning
445 | hw->event_base = (unsigned long)cd->pmu_base +
| (
446 | is_7xx ? NI700_PMEVCNTR(hw->idx) : NI_PMEVCNTR(hw->idx);
| ^
| )
drivers/perf/arm-ni.c:446:13: note: place parentheses around the '?:' expression to evaluate it first
446 | is_7xx ? NI700_PMEVCNTR(hw->idx) : NI_PMEVCNTR(hw->idx);
| ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.
vim +433 drivers/perf/arm-ni.c
418
419 static int arm_ni_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
420 {
421 struct arm_ni_cd *cd = pmu_to_cd(event->pmu);
422 struct hw_perf_event *hw = &event->hw;
423 struct arm_ni_unit *unit;
424 enum ni_node_type type = NI_EVENT_TYPE(event);
425 bool is_7xx = arm_ni_is_7xx(cd_to_ni(cd));
426 u32 reg;
427
428 if (type == NI_PMU) {
429 if (cd->ccnt)
430 return -ENOSPC;
431 hw->idx = NI_CCNT_IDX;
432 hw->event_base = (unsigned long)cd->pmu_base +
> 433 is_7xx ? NI700_PMCCNTR_L : NI_PMCCNTR_L;
434 cd->ccnt = event;
435 arm_ni_init_ccnt(hw);
436 } else {
437 hw->idx = 0;
438 while (cd->evcnt[hw->idx]) {
439 if (++hw->idx == NI_NUM_COUNTERS)
440 return -ENOSPC;
441 }
442 cd->evcnt[hw->idx] = event;
443 unit = (void *)hw->config_base;
444 unit->event[hw->idx] = NI_EVENT_EVENTID(event);
445 hw->event_base = (unsigned long)cd->pmu_base +
446 is_7xx ? NI700_PMEVCNTR(hw->idx) : NI_PMEVCNTR(hw->idx);
447 arm_ni_init_evcnt(hw);
448 lo_hi_writeq_relaxed(le64_to_cpu(unit->pmusel), unit->pmusela);
449
450 reg = FIELD_PREP(NI_PMEVTYPER_NODE_TYPE, type) |
451 FIELD_PREP(NI_PMEVTYPER_NODE_ID, NI_EVENT_NODEID(event));
452 writel_relaxed(reg, cd->pmu_base + NI_PMEVTYPER(hw->idx));
453 }
454 if (flags & PERF_EF_START)
455 arm_ni_event_start(event, 0);
456 return 0;
457 }
458
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-04 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-04 9:43 kernel test robot [this message]
2025-11-04 12:35 ` [arm-perf:for-next/perf 6/8] drivers/perf/arm-ni.c:433:13: warning: operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'; '+' will be evaluated first Will Deacon
2025-11-04 13:26 ` Robin Murphy
2025-11-04 13:32 ` Will Deacon
2025-11-04 14:04 ` Robin Murphy
2025-11-04 18:24 ` Will Deacon
2025-11-04 18:36 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202511041749.ok8zDP6u-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox