llvm.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [POC][RFC][PATCH 1/3] tracing: Add perf events
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 17:01:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202511201858.3pMxCiBz-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251118003531.644484343@kernel.org>

Hi Steven,

[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on trace/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on next-20251119]
[cannot apply to linus/master v6.18-rc6]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Steven-Rostedt/tracing-Add-perf-events/20251118-083721
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251118003531.644484343%40kernel.org
patch subject: [POC][RFC][PATCH 1/3] tracing: Add perf events
config: s390-randconfig-001-20251120 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251120/202511201858.3pMxCiBz-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 0bba1e76581bad04e7d7f09f5115ae5e2989e0d9)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251120/202511201858.3pMxCiBz-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511201858.3pMxCiBz-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1681:18: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct perf_event_entry'
    1681 |         for (val = field->values; val < end; val++) {
         |                    ~~~~~^
   kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1672:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct perf_event_entry'
    1672 |         struct perf_event_entry *field;
         |                ^
   kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1682:19: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct perf_event_entry'
    1682 |                 if (val != field->values)
         |                            ~~~~~^
   kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1672:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct perf_event_entry'
    1672 |         struct perf_event_entry *field;
         |                ^
>> kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1684:11: error: call to undeclared function 'PERF_TRACE_VALUE'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
    1684 |                 value = PERF_TRACE_VALUE(*val);
         |                         ^
>> kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1685:11: error: call to undeclared function 'PERF_TRACE_TYPE'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
    1685 |                 switch (PERF_TRACE_TYPE(*val)) {
         |                         ^
>> kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1686:8: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_TRACE_CYCLES'; did you mean 'PERF_TRACE_TYPE'?
    1686 |                 case PERF_TRACE_CYCLES:
         |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                      PERF_TRACE_TYPE
   kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1685:11: note: 'PERF_TRACE_TYPE' declared here
    1685 |                 switch (PERF_TRACE_TYPE(*val)) {
         |                         ^
>> kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1686:8: error: integer constant expression must have integer type, not 'int ()'
    1686 |                 case PERF_TRACE_CYCLES:
         |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1689:8: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_TRACE_CACHE'; did you mean 'PERF_TRACE_VALUE'?
    1689 |                 case PERF_TRACE_CACHE:
         |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                      PERF_TRACE_VALUE
   kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1684:11: note: 'PERF_TRACE_VALUE' declared here
    1684 |                 value = PERF_TRACE_VALUE(*val);
         |                         ^
   kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1689:8: error: integer constant expression must have integer type, not 'int ()'
    1689 |                 case PERF_TRACE_CACHE:
         |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1714:18: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct perf_event_entry'
    1714 |         for (val = field->values; val < end; val++) {
         |                    ~~~~~^
   kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1705:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct perf_event_entry'
    1705 |         struct perf_event_entry *field;
         |                ^
   kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1715:19: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct perf_event_entry'
    1715 |                 if (val != field->values)
         |                            ~~~~~^
   kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1705:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct perf_event_entry'
    1705 |         struct perf_event_entry *field;
         |                ^
   10 errors generated.


vim +1681 kernel/trace/trace_output.c

  1665	
  1666	static enum print_line_t
  1667	trace_perf_event_print(struct trace_iterator *iter, int flags,
  1668			       struct trace_event *event)
  1669	{
  1670		struct trace_entry *entry = iter->ent;
  1671		struct trace_seq *s = &iter->seq;
  1672		struct perf_event_entry *field;
  1673		u64 value;
  1674		u64 *val;
  1675		u64 *end;
  1676	
  1677		end = (u64 *)((long)iter->ent + iter->ent_size);
  1678	
  1679		trace_assign_type(field, entry);
  1680	
> 1681		for (val = field->values; val < end; val++) {
  1682			if (val != field->values)
  1683				trace_seq_putc(s, ' ');
> 1684			value = PERF_TRACE_VALUE(*val);
> 1685			switch (PERF_TRACE_TYPE(*val)) {
> 1686			case PERF_TRACE_CYCLES:
  1687				trace_seq_printf(s, "cpu_cycles: %lld", value);
  1688				break;
> 1689			case PERF_TRACE_CACHE:
  1690				trace_seq_printf(s, "cache_misses: %lld", value);
  1691				break;
  1692			default:
  1693				trace_seq_printf(s, "unkown(%d): %lld",
  1694						 (int)PERF_TRACE_TYPE(*val), value);
  1695			}
  1696		}
  1697		trace_seq_putc(s, '\n');
  1698		return trace_handle_return(s);
  1699	}
  1700	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

           reply	other threads:[~2025-11-20  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <20251118003531.644484343@kernel.org>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202511201858.3pMxCiBz-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).