From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0DB9219A8D; Sat, 6 Dec 2025 03:19:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764991181; cv=none; b=OLYvh/vYc3Z1fhSvDmzEug7/m5ATgdWeil3cuBFi/IdfmPvW5+Ea5PBUG/FwIauG5qlmsHkmMa0NMdtpiv0uCoQ8wbKw1qvfygDBnwd8lVD9ZLzxO2iCUwVakZdOvOGY2JjpCDa0KyAP10140cGIokK7SsYtofXZ6Z+Iunf373k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764991181; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5gH637Pes04sa8dca3MnyEjtJ4p46PyN8XeJW2eyJ/s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=NQhGosp/88+CzVf8wGC0Hx4EmgHpNLPziSebD7S7lhbFlIp5ChtSG7XCgXHBNbtOQK5ywepqPhrOD+Rd6sbgRyx5Z2u1Wjm5XO5NzqFdocTz8/Ucll79b/YwkS0IzgiFCdqOX9ScyuYbQDcPy0EMBOQgc9K8+rQWiLfDuvFqNFw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=CnMDbKvd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="CnMDbKvd" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1764991180; x=1796527180; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=5gH637Pes04sa8dca3MnyEjtJ4p46PyN8XeJW2eyJ/s=; b=CnMDbKvdj7xr8AzrQU4FY6goGCK6jt/RItH/KUNAx5koWrcpioy05AJm 871fAcY9xh1CVp2CfcaN+j0G8+8SMeEy/M10kJiNzEDeImGPUwEqHKS9O ySNun+t2COlzhXx/YGVrSKGJdaikuU/0EuI8CghmdQuioUQazXeGNWJJe ceOzSzgjGOr4alGXjDv/rqrLBEMNlprqpsfYKhOdr3vwU3kYKCXnWtygC V71gtrCfXKsOAsjOOrcsdt10ASqvMy0RNNexUJNTYsBIhoHPPoIywsxU/ V6PXXduhpZgGPmXRotoE9k5XPcVCfEMqABzlhDXV13nsmkHm1wiA6VdYL g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: QGVhZ4VeQXuFkEYY0ZsBkg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 5Ubya6PGTzO4Zgz5BT+2PA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11633"; a="70877764" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,253,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="70877764" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by orvoesa106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Dec 2025 19:19:40 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: /FlQIMuHQ6WB1l5Y0IpOnA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 1rZPUzLrShiRQVuphcTEzw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,253,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="199929287" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 4664bbef4914) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2025 19:19:36 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 4664bbef4914 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vRipZ-00000000Fob-2I6r; Sat, 06 Dec 2025 03:19:33 +0000 Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 11:18:45 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Jian Hu , Jerome Brunet , Xianwei Zhao , Chuan Liu , Neil Armstrong , Kevin Hilman , Stephen Boyd , Michael Turquette , robh+dt , Rob Herring Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Jian Hu , devicetree , linux-clk , linux-amlogic , linux-kernel , linux-arm-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] clk: meson: t7: add support for the T7 SoC PLL clock Message-ID: <202512061054.wsIzRCCd-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251204053635.1234150-5-jian.hu@amlogic.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251204053635.1234150-5-jian.hu@amlogic.com> Hi Jian, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on clk/clk-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.18 next-20251205] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jian-Hu/dt-bindings-clock-add-Amlogic-T7-PLL-clock-controller/20251204-135351 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git clk-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251204053635.1234150-5-jian.hu%40amlogic.com patch subject: [PATCH v6 4/5] clk: meson: t7: add support for the T7 SoC PLL clock config: arm64-randconfig-003-20251206 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251206/202512061054.wsIzRCCd-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 14bf95b06a18b9b59c89601cbc0e5a6f2176b118) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251206/202512061054.wsIzRCCd-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512061054.wsIzRCCd-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: meson_clk_mpll_ops >>> referenced by t7-pll.c >>> drivers/clk/meson/t7-pll.o:(.compoundliteral.51) in archive vmlinux.a >>> referenced by t7-pll.c >>> drivers/clk/meson/t7-pll.o:(.compoundliteral.59) in archive vmlinux.a >>> referenced by t7-pll.c >>> drivers/clk/meson/t7-pll.o:(.compoundliteral.67) in archive vmlinux.a >>> referenced 1 more times >>> did you mean: meson_clk_pll_ops >>> defined in: vmlinux.a(drivers/clk/meson/clk-pll.o) -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki