From: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
To: lkp@intel.com
Cc: 21cnbao@gmail.com, ada.coupriediaz@arm.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
m.szyprowski@samsung.com, maz@kernel.org,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, robin.murphy@arm.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, surenb@google.com, v-songbaohua@oppo.com,
will@kernel.org, zhengtangquan@oppo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] dma-mapping: Allow batched DMA sync operations if supported by the arch
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 13:15:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251221051523.18557-1-21cnbao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202512201836.f6KX6WMH-lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> kernel/dma/direct.c:456:4: error: call to undeclared function 'dma_direct_unmap_phys_batch_add'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 456 | dma_direct_unmap_phys_batch_add(dev, sg->dma_address,
> | ^
> kernel/dma/direct.c:456:4: note: did you mean 'dma_direct_unmap_phys'?
> kernel/dma/direct.h:188:20: note: 'dma_direct_unmap_phys' declared here
> 188 | static inline void dma_direct_unmap_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
> | ^
> >> kernel/dma/direct.c:484:22: error: call to undeclared function 'dma_direct_map_phys_batch_add'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 484 | sg->dma_address = dma_direct_map_phys_batch_add(dev, sg_phys(sg),
> | ^
> 2 errors generated.
>
>
Thanks very much for the report.
Can you please check if the below diff fix the build issue?
From 5541aa1efa19777e435c9f3cca7cd2c6a490d9f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 13:09:36 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kernel/dma: Fix build errors for dma_direct_map_phys
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512201836.f6KX6WMH-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
---
kernel/dma/direct.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.h b/kernel/dma/direct.h
index a211bab26478..bcc398b5aa6b 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.h
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.h
@@ -138,8 +138,7 @@ static inline dma_addr_t __dma_direct_map_phys(struct device *dev,
return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_DMA_SYNC
-static inline dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_phys_batch_add(struct device *dev,
+static inline dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_phys(struct device *dev,
phys_addr_t phys, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
unsigned long attrs)
{
@@ -147,13 +146,13 @@ static inline dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_phys_batch_add(struct device *dev,
if (dma_addr != DMA_MAPPING_ERROR && !dev_is_dma_coherent(dev) &&
!(attrs & (DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC | DMA_ATTR_MMIO)))
- arch_sync_dma_for_device_batch_add(phys, size, dir);
+ arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys, size, dir);
return dma_addr;
}
-#endif
-static inline dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_phys(struct device *dev,
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_DMA_SYNC
+static inline dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_phys_batch_add(struct device *dev,
phys_addr_t phys, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
unsigned long attrs)
{
@@ -161,13 +160,20 @@ static inline dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_phys(struct device *dev,
if (dma_addr != DMA_MAPPING_ERROR && !dev_is_dma_coherent(dev) &&
!(attrs & (DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC | DMA_ATTR_MMIO)))
- arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys, size, dir);
+ arch_sync_dma_for_device_batch_add(phys, size, dir);
return dma_addr;
}
+#else
+static inline dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_phys_batch_add(struct device *dev,
+ phys_addr_t phys, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
+ unsigned long attrs)
+{
+ return dma_direct_map_phys(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
+}
+#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_DMA_SYNC
-static inline void dma_direct_unmap_phys_batch_add(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
+static inline void dma_direct_unmap_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
{
phys_addr_t phys;
@@ -178,14 +184,14 @@ static inline void dma_direct_unmap_phys_batch_add(struct device *dev, dma_addr_
phys = dma_to_phys(dev, addr);
if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC))
- dma_direct_sync_single_for_cpu_batch_add(dev, addr, size, dir);
+ dma_direct_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, addr, size, dir);
swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, phys, size, dir,
attrs | DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
}
-#endif
-static inline void dma_direct_unmap_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_DMA_SYNC
+static inline void dma_direct_unmap_phys_batch_add(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
{
phys_addr_t phys;
@@ -196,9 +202,17 @@ static inline void dma_direct_unmap_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
phys = dma_to_phys(dev, addr);
if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC))
- dma_direct_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, addr, size, dir);
+ dma_direct_sync_single_for_cpu_batch_add(dev, addr, size, dir);
swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, phys, size, dir,
attrs | DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
}
+#else
+static inline void dma_direct_unmap_phys_batch_add(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
+ size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
+{
+ dma_direct_unmap_phys(dev, addr, size, dir, attrs);
+}
+#endif
+
#endif /* _KERNEL_DMA_DIRECT_H */
--
2.39.3 (Apple Git-146)
Thanks
Barry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-21 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20251219053658.84978-6-21cnbao@gmail.com>
2025-12-20 17:37 ` [PATCH 5/6] dma-mapping: Allow batched DMA sync operations if supported by the arch kernel test robot
2025-12-21 5:15 ` Barry Song [this message]
2025-12-22 12:43 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251221051523.18557-1-21cnbao@gmail.com \
--to=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhengtangquan@oppo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox