From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F4E91B3B19; Sun, 21 Dec 2025 00:35:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766277361; cv=none; b=Dg64/dkLiR4aegcoaquQUUtR7cjXTrghFYAPd2h8bB6oer1mThzxxKt/6w+iL2bhJM6MQU0F8ZDduKGCswtzsOMMU5jf3R0Xg5a+1rlxHTOsskmk6gWFPfa5Uo5wMbtzpiHxqSridREUmYEy9Yz/3nziChEHHjwNl0sfXiVEyIk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766277361; c=relaxed/simple; bh=olObcnixTQC+iT6Uj2T2HTqCsOCWX5vmWjNPGkjgSF8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OmL8HAlia/zuCrBmS8IpzNl8hsLjgnPtPjSAsTVakND+67Sdp6UW8VQsBAiTWnx2170grqUOgJASCvxYmKwJRbfcXCb7nYnO2r42YdtOzEX8MIsv+L0m9cr5dfPqbV5/9vrQYI54oShFf9PkCmHyL+uTTHR/UZyZMhB3IFk0ozc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=lzOOK1wq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="lzOOK1wq" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1766277360; x=1797813360; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=olObcnixTQC+iT6Uj2T2HTqCsOCWX5vmWjNPGkjgSF8=; b=lzOOK1wqzGVeSXmAn9NDqW5VD0UNKVGM4eJV03bd834xfGtZk/uMf2ik yzVpVKs708MCiN/mg2SOEeUMFqX8XjybrYoVdecF6mN1u/30ZJUbfkOFN 40wB1OocfJGxxDLi5oIxTlLdTKrdj3/ot8XjNbBklTVCSJ+W/gpzWcf8P 2wrf8aWnU8y4fIQFy4CkdcyIxiwMK8NBnt7sN8KlwNCeSGMhkOjGjoLl8 6P1Dd+hxJmEf6YlbrURtJzhsGhsKjnq71EDD3bXzcn1NbkghK+fmElYJt VuSb2ds3dgrehWNstSpnmKIf6/zQIZLa+98+V7qvWt4IldtArkP7wm2BQ Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: YQkMzQuWRvyvKM/F+cwgnA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: O22p2xm2TeCLfCAzyIsLJA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11648"; a="78507752" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,164,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="78507752" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Dec 2025 16:36:00 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XrbkD7s0Q1GuuPrMe5yT1g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: PCy7FnIiTFq6rbqjhiKFEA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,164,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="198941116" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 0d09efa1b85f) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2025 16:35:56 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 0d09efa1b85f with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vX7QK-000000005Dt-0UC8; Sun, 21 Dec 2025 00:35:48 +0000 Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 08:35:30 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Roman Shlyakhov , Bjorn Helgaas Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: extend pci-stub to support explicit binding by PCI BUSID Message-ID: <202512210848.d1IKcriu-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251219131038.21052-1-roman.shlyakhov.rs@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251219131038.21052-1-roman.shlyakhov.rs@gmail.com> Hi Roman, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on pci/next] [also build test ERROR on pci/for-linus linus/master v6.19-rc1 next-20251219] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Roman-Shlyakhov/pci-extend-pci-stub-to-support-explicit-binding-by-PCI-BUSID/20251219-211130 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251219131038.21052-1-roman.shlyakhov.rs%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH] pci: extend pci-stub to support explicit binding by PCI BUSID config: riscv-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251221/202512210848.d1IKcriu-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project b324c9f4fa112d61a553bf489b5f4f7ceea05ea8) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251221/202512210848.d1IKcriu-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512210848.d1IKcriu-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/pci/pci-stub.c:220:13: error: expected parameter declarator 220 | early_param("pci_stub_busid", pci_stub_early_param); | ^ >> drivers/pci/pci-stub.c:220:13: error: expected ')' drivers/pci/pci-stub.c:220:12: note: to match this '(' 220 | early_param("pci_stub_busid", pci_stub_early_param); | ^ >> drivers/pci/pci-stub.c:220:1: error: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit int [-Wimplicit-int] 220 | early_param("pci_stub_busid", pci_stub_early_param); | ^ | int >> drivers/pci/pci-stub.c:220:12: error: a function declaration without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C [-Werror,-Wstrict-prototypes] 220 | early_param("pci_stub_busid", pci_stub_early_param); | ^ | void 4 errors generated. vim +220 drivers/pci/pci-stub.c 219 > 220 early_param("pci_stub_busid", pci_stub_early_param); 221 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki