From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D3202C235E; Tue, 6 Jan 2026 20:41:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767732131; cv=none; b=kwSsIkYTmTCjj7V7ZsrTJ2xQT7jdIyT/Nf7FhjBf8Y9Bdrsmzpjtogi0p84sGCV/I7/Ih7m6QA/LAx5W2i7i0yEKf/L4RDgeV8yStibTuulEqpEuRIjKsO9EIofhvfo/Dr1PK4ejsrqL61asoJJ0e6Ai5J7uBJ6cjUGat83lkAA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767732131; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QdU+6NVMxxEzVebMqZpEsC53ZJi/7OFJtfc5Tylldb4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=EEOz8AeMm/NORm9uYVWsy8WkkmdbTC6OJj6HMK/1ogSSEG+Uun1UJm/jg6nugCBl4ABepW+mm3KiCVZ3ys8I/F8K3wnPFeTv8f8KclQfShA5Jvte1tmfu0bRMpmrbn0Hhva5Ib9Cc9XtCwUzfkUdQ/RsAllSetXlTJkJsUfhx0g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=heZES/eo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="heZES/eo" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1767732121; x=1799268121; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=QdU+6NVMxxEzVebMqZpEsC53ZJi/7OFJtfc5Tylldb4=; b=heZES/eonyu3wAl5RE+C1GEsBdkCJMxoezA1q50aFSvBDUnYQoM2qzXt sMSGZ71NNuowxtOS+2VIWG3K3Rui5i/GQjG3LdDlPD0BRKrMNlnomqKmJ OPv6X9DyzB48gxUuitwzxuNhK6l5ZcJPwkGKzDk0eH43zNFSSa/5kFubj pbgxEdJA3HjCmwX5ELePvYAo9fGOc1yaK9RXBEkFFG2C/VYLIodzaJD83 p2nkYjFu+YfExfUMiScHZkRt8BMWDODOVu7Se0DQfyE25VllNCrZApVER /WkwABZwnA5qAsGVVL1AI8z8TcUUU7zhIpmhYaGmcaYLTNgNolpmpF/SG w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: qVcJXo4QQq6kwAa3qaPSUQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: dQREj8wvRnqQdKxZcQ230g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11663"; a="69011997" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,206,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="69011997" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa111.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jan 2026 12:41:49 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: gkNM0d3nRzugpbb3AvAAvw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: blcg7+VlRxKYHjNuAEQhSA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,206,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="203198562" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO 92b2e8bd97aa) ([10.211.93.152]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Jan 2026 12:41:48 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 92b2e8bd97aa with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vdDsA-000000001Mb-0SXJ; Tue, 06 Jan 2026 20:41:46 +0000 Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 21:41:08 +0100 From: kernel test robot To: K Prateek Nayak Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Pass the policy to cpufreq_driver->adjust_perf() Message-ID: <202601062141.sfoMtUSB-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260106073608.278644-3-kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260106073608.278644-3-kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Hi Prateek, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on 8aa9e2868a8e38ccc5228399fc641d54aea444ed] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/K-Prateek-Nayak/cpufreq-amd-pstate-Pass-the-policy-to-amd_pstate_update/20260106-154118 base: 8aa9e2868a8e38ccc5228399fc641d54aea444ed patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260106073608.278644-3-kprateek.nayak%40amd.com patch subject: [RFC PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Pass the policy to cpufreq_driver->adjust_perf() config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260106/202601062141.sfoMtUSB-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260106/202601062141.sfoMtUSB-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601062141.sfoMtUSB-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> Warning: drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2250 function parameter 'policy' not described in 'cpufreq_driver_adjust_perf' >> Warning: drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2250 function parameter 'policy' not described in 'cpufreq_driver_adjust_perf' -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki