From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] HID: surface: Use pm_ptr_sleep instead of #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 02:14:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202601130224.PFFZLOhf-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260112105500.3664834-13-hadess@hadess.net>
Hi Bastien,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on hid/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.19-rc5 next-20260109]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Bastien-Nocera/HID-hid-alps-Use-pm_ptr-instead-of-ifdef-CONFIG_PM/20260112-190559
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hid/hid.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260112105500.3664834-13-hadess%40hadess.net
patch subject: [PATCH 12/12] HID: surface: Use pm_ptr_sleep instead of #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
config: loongarch-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260113/202601130224.PFFZLOhf-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project cd708029e0b2869e80abe31ddb175f7c35361f90)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260113/202601130224.PFFZLOhf-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601130224.PFFZLOhf-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/hid/surface-hid/surface_hid.c:244:9: error: call to undeclared function 'pm_ptr_sleep'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
244 | .pm = pm_ptr_sleep(&surface_hid_pm_ops),
| ^
>> drivers/hid/surface-hid/surface_hid.c:244:9: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion initializing 'const struct dev_pm_ops *' with an expression of type 'int' [-Wint-conversion]
244 | .pm = pm_ptr_sleep(&surface_hid_pm_ops),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/hid/surface-hid/surface_hid.c:244:9: error: initializer element is not a compile-time constant
244 | .pm = pm_ptr_sleep(&surface_hid_pm_ops),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
3 errors generated.
vim +/pm_ptr_sleep +244 drivers/hid/surface-hid/surface_hid.c
237
238 static struct ssam_device_driver surface_hid_driver = {
239 .probe = surface_hid_probe,
240 .remove = surface_hid_remove,
241 .match_table = surface_hid_match,
242 .driver = {
243 .name = "surface_hid",
> 244 .pm = pm_ptr_sleep(&surface_hid_pm_ops),
245 .probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS,
246 },
247 };
248 module_ssam_device_driver(surface_hid_driver);
249
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-12 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260112105500.3664834-13-hadess@hadess.net>
2026-01-12 17:00 ` [PATCH 12/12] HID: surface: Use pm_ptr_sleep instead of #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP kernel test robot
2026-01-12 18:14 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202601130224.PFFZLOhf-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=hadess@hadess.net \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox