From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64CD52D7DD5; Sat, 17 Jan 2026 18:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768674677; cv=none; b=Ebo1KchHa0gTIS8QmtttUyFcOZXnbQsTGEi+MTbSCcF9WeKXKypiFBk8cxHLRnSpzqpRu3Ki3jlXXloJPP0s5g20kK37wOIuLg46JHWL+/HYCtaBEe2NZWH774LHa2tF/uz8O1G//Dsa+9J60mtoHI4lI/ghmut9lOWn5yBAi7I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768674677; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aTkbxl3lYXIJ4D1eCN10mVbG/Ol/FgsJaAk3tI1J0yM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gny4BPhDO6JEo5qc4SRCFYpCUgj3fdkH0ZwV1f5XixGTXey/2pQw0kEOa/p4sz3qK/bjaCpigQ24g4t3za4CnZaK3LuqDsfV7RQJXq+aOLxtjvYvzJdjoy7zPAabDN0jABFfv2hMkhu4h6d3VOJUm6qwxFGxXYXgWALmIOVQW4s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=XKO4QeD7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="XKO4QeD7" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1768674675; x=1800210675; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=aTkbxl3lYXIJ4D1eCN10mVbG/Ol/FgsJaAk3tI1J0yM=; b=XKO4QeD7KPJPqrE0LTi7UcFF+UOvkfzjpmox+elTFwYklDh7ZWNYqjao NpQlhW4NL2KV2PWHnmqPfJCKWiRQTaB4veZEpNKzcOSHxoIT30j+q2Lb/ jyR/SMbztvPhljHxB8KTbfoPmrngU2G3Gj1NHzvhmUHCLf2R3HZLRUzcN bx9QI2DiAK9n/IFXE10pIBLDLCKce0crYyG9IRCqx+vzElMTE/GDl/lgZ PcpjglxpXPoikvvQqtifRnNUlpNFG8p+A0QF0EGPfUeskSc7/nVHz2nkL Wl7xxpp49mBPWP4w3K4sb6g5YgVPVIfyvdyDPhVHyL2eUT4tbVfQJ9O0s Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vFFQ83gJRlGJ5TtGTSa4wA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gVdrQFZaR4iszN6PzDG8uQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11674"; a="69928034" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,234,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="69928034" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jan 2026 10:31:14 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ZAYtqoq6TeWZ8PDxIfiAOg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 94nP9B8rR4eqvkmbtTo1Bg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,234,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="209996337" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 765f4a05e27f) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jan 2026 10:31:12 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 765f4a05e27f with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vhB4o-00000000M8M-0EYC; Sat, 17 Jan 2026 18:31:10 +0000 Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 02:30:54 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Yang Xiuwei Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] bsg: add uring_cmd support to BSG generic layer Message-ID: <202601180229.GMPWbiZI-lkp@intel.com> References: <217eb9315df1a2aea32a595a12b8a5b16ba597b5.1768536312.git.yangxiuwei@kylinos.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <217eb9315df1a2aea32a595a12b8a5b16ba597b5.1768536312.git.yangxiuwei@kylinos.cn> Hi Yang, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on mkp-scsi/for-next] [also build test ERROR on jejb-scsi/for-next axboe/for-next linus/master v6.19-rc5] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yang-Xiuwei/bsg-add-bsg_uring_cmd-uapi-structure/20260116-123155 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/217eb9315df1a2aea32a595a12b8a5b16ba597b5.1768536312.git.yangxiuwei%40kylinos.cn patch subject: [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] bsg: add uring_cmd support to BSG generic layer config: x86_64-randconfig-003-20260117 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260118/202601180229.GMPWbiZI-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260118/202601180229.GMPWbiZI-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601180229.GMPWbiZI-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: scsi_bsg_uring_cmd >>> referenced by bsg.c:217 (block/bsg.c:217) >>> block/bsg.o:(bsg_uring_cmd) in archive vmlinux.a -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki