From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3E323ECBFD; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 13:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770299952; cv=none; b=CWF67ntX+Rr3oGuQ33yl1OOy50YyCIO19H7C45TlVOFb6UV6D2fZAz1LINqKRhnS8XcuS0C6qXaWPYtxsDRUPLj3mKq42EOmelUjjNTIJuM1Jk7nMy0vXsZuYouegyms6eZlA5IBcpwftClq/iURFW0KyDZvPgkLfwm4atho4DU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770299952; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vOINlmVOf+LD9CAcP4f+8Px5e9XnMosQwffTdTf2cFU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HYnasWusuE6QkH/NpdnEZpD0adkeLma7nhmcQj9rL9z0tv4lVCWllotnYlMDYl0SzmchjSm7Q69ul0XzvVvfh+YgNzDTiz7NCNdpbrEt4qY5NlPQAb7LJmEP2CSZ9tnmUkNyTD3lELMDMCZWipeYX0GF1jTwBMXp4LU6c4eBsJ0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ACeIfetD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ACeIfetD" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770299952; x=1801835952; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=vOINlmVOf+LD9CAcP4f+8Px5e9XnMosQwffTdTf2cFU=; b=ACeIfetDUfXmDg0Pd+ejejVbqOhJuxkPwdp6Lm1t6hzTN538yNKnNhxp i0QbbZLBE6K3OQGBya4LTDQf2ohMSVAH7xbTum+5f15EUmAzyql4UXX3P i6YWT7a7KNLr0a9PTBrMmQ+UK16YxXM3lXz6eDRO3D9k5qm6hFVBlSwic jRKKxF3sxjuF1ITMLrsteAMTM8cxycQff/ktxtsPnwbiDmxmRDZEViQXH knMm0qN/43sh0SDeTJyzKRkYrbeYWsh9Yhvix6ZP6pwqYHP/N2B/DZ0kv vRxcyO/Jp7C/caKQaqY0JWDzAdk6ex5Z7r8AYIW9iZIZdC+0z5wss76PD w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 1VakVdhXQbqf9TqQ9cLJEw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: LwBWCTNPQ3GTjkOr5EV//A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11692"; a="75350476" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,274,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="75350476" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by orvoesa106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Feb 2026 05:59:11 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 0h4W3Y9lRuWEY959xIrL3g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: CkUkIo86T2Wi6lIKDd6ceA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,274,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="215505868" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 765f4a05e27f) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2026 05:59:11 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 765f4a05e27f with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vnzsx-00000000jrQ-3aQO; Thu, 05 Feb 2026 13:59:07 +0000 Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 21:58:37 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Philipp Stanner Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] rust/drm: Add DRM Jobqueue Message-ID: <202602052141.VLBZpLLo-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260203081403.68733-5-phasta@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260203081403.68733-5-phasta@kernel.org> Hi Philipp, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on rust/rust-next] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.19-rc8] [cannot apply to tip/locking/core next-20260204] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Philipp-Stanner/rust-list-Add-unsafe-for-container_of/20260203-162013 base: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux rust-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260203081403.68733-5-phasta%40kernel.org patch subject: [RFC PATCH 3/4] rust/drm: Add DRM Jobqueue config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-004-20260205 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260205/202602052141.VLBZpLLo-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) rustc: rustc 1.88.0 (6b00bc388 2025-06-23) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260205/202602052141.VLBZpLLo-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602052141.VLBZpLLo-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> warning: field `run_job` is never read --> rust/kernel/drm/jq.rs:531:5 | 528 | pub struct Jobqueue { | -------- field in this struct ... 531 | run_job: fn(&Pin<&mut Job>) -> ARef>, | ^^^^^^^ | = note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` on by default -- >> warning: missing documentation for a struct field --> rust/kernel/drm/jq.rs:126:5 | 126 | pub data: T, | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: requested on the command line with `-W missing-docs` -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki