From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D56E2FFF8D; Fri, 6 Feb 2026 16:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770394809; cv=none; b=m1wcFcIJHZ8ZqwkVIrLthAbg/LClz4J9LGa5MQiDb5xGkoHzVSquwnvmSVFpFg3houEvzbx+inxQlL870vz+YtsnQO8yZ6zrj7yJwwdZxbQwZmd4hirif0jAPiKqL1qCXmUegtI4IrUbTsz4DsdZWjIWrJ1F1zMeIqu8WepmVOo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770394809; c=relaxed/simple; bh=f0XDwV9tjto381cHBE9tb6ddkN7CanMXtXtA+02cOqU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=P6lihmbzc6E4iVNHtVL7bqGnKmWJcbnnFFSGaMOix8jTaQOtLzL4dtyrlolSDAXvqGOKxk/Zb/IjDz6IxXDVimfC1F4kdUcbNK0L+K60t08mwIZBZxlHMbJm8WtXw9KnSfYo0G7w5Btet2PJzisdiejFoePHWfAUaL6CLJfVjGQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=QAlvcnm5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="QAlvcnm5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770394809; x=1801930809; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=f0XDwV9tjto381cHBE9tb6ddkN7CanMXtXtA+02cOqU=; b=QAlvcnm5lV5j1YwFRp0D8IVfTMh549R5zcPfMS/l+rzVAnpKAKtgQsK5 awGnKU3ndqtyUI0Z+s3JCY0eKHzb1mhUeBlB43Ie0qR1g0O7HFO7cyTpf cPfMcyX9pZsEXociwjp8Awon7jW9m0E/27qiBTpmVoRFb0XtsFoGUKs1Q SedT4QwYDoh/sN/5As0OAT9N1+Go98N8kRhU45RyFvcxHTva+hMG20mR7 GKMQ1tX9OT7N/vQPeY5/1f4fxHiX2MK81c6MbtbfTplq8/9FIedYKlWNL 7HxAR8v8TmjswSZMtcaZxOB+h7MKcDb54VCeiMiO4fi+23yRbzKgZ3pO3 g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: wTbzOCuySV2+xynrAFFBiA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: EoWBXQocSRm37oo7lVDWTA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11693"; a="75224960" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,276,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="75224960" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Feb 2026 08:20:08 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: eEkGmmJjQXC8p+o7zp96Fw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 8nvw3XAgQKK8jD09amGXiw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,276,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="215085419" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 765f4a05e27f) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2026 08:20:05 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 765f4a05e27f with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1voOYs-00000000ktM-1Zd1; Fri, 06 Feb 2026 16:20:02 +0000 Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2026 00:19:11 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Shengjiu Wang , shengjiu.wang@gmail.com, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, festevam@gmail.com, nicoleotsuka@gmail.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: fsl_xcvr: add bitcount and timestamp controls Message-ID: <202602070032.CtJMTCOn-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260206084334.483404-3-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260206084334.483404-3-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> Hi Shengjiu, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on broonie-sound/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.19-rc8 next-20260205] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Shengjiu-Wang/ASoC-fsl_sai-add-bitcount-and-timestamp-controls/20260206-164423 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260206084334.483404-3-shengjiu.wang%40nxp.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: fsl_xcvr: add bitcount and timestamp controls config: hexagon-randconfig-002-20260206 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260207/202602070032.CtJMTCOn-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9b8addffa70cee5b2acc5454712d9cf78ce45710) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260207/202602070032.CtJMTCOn-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602070032.CtJMTCOn-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> sound/soc/fsl/fsl_xcvr.c:70:46: error: call to undeclared function '__bf_shf'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 70 | SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(FSL_XCVR_TX_DPTH_CNTR_CTRL, __bf_shf(FSL_XCVR_TX_DPTH_CNTR_CTRL_TSINC), | ^ >> sound/soc/fsl/fsl_xcvr.c:70:46: error: initializer element is not a compile-time constant 70 | SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(FSL_XCVR_TX_DPTH_CNTR_CTRL, __bf_shf(FSL_XCVR_TX_DPTH_CNTR_CTRL_TSINC), | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 71 | ARRAY_SIZE(inc_mode), inc_mode), | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/sound/soc.h:215:24: note: expanded from macro 'SOC_ENUM_SINGLE' 215 | SOC_ENUM_DOUBLE(xreg, xshift, xshift, xitems, xtexts) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/sound/soc.h:211:27: note: expanded from macro 'SOC_ENUM_DOUBLE' 211 | { .reg = xreg, .shift_l = xshift_l, .shift_r = xshift_r, \ | ^~~~~~~~ sound/soc/fsl/fsl_xcvr.c:78:6: error: initializer element is not a compile-time constant 78 | __bf_shf(FSL_XCVR_TX_DPTH_CNTR_CTRL_TSEN), 1, 0), | ^ sound/soc/fsl/fsl_xcvr.c:81:6: error: initializer element is not a compile-time constant 81 | __bf_shf(FSL_XCVR_TX_DPTH_CNTR_CTRL_RTSC), 1, 0), | ^ sound/soc/fsl/fsl_xcvr.c:83:6: error: initializer element is not a compile-time constant 83 | __bf_shf(FSL_XCVR_TX_DPTH_CNTR_CTRL_RBC), 1, 0), | ^ sound/soc/fsl/fsl_xcvr.c:93:6: error: initializer element is not a compile-time constant 93 | __bf_shf(FSL_XCVR_RX_DPTH_CNTR_CTRL_TSEN), 1, 0), | ^ sound/soc/fsl/fsl_xcvr.c:96:6: error: initializer element is not a compile-time constant 96 | __bf_shf(FSL_XCVR_RX_DPTH_CNTR_CTRL_RTSC), 1, 0), | ^ sound/soc/fsl/fsl_xcvr.c:98:6: error: initializer element is not a compile-time constant 98 | __bf_shf(FSL_XCVR_RX_DPTH_CNTR_CTRL_RBC), 1, 0), | ^ >> sound/soc/fsl/fsl_xcvr.c:1133:19: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'const struct snd_kcontrol_new[]' 1133 | .num_controls = ARRAY_SIZE(fsl_xcvr_timestamp_ctrls), | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/array_size.h:11:32: note: expanded from macro 'ARRAY_SIZE' 11 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) + __must_be_array(arr)) | ^~~~~ 9 errors generated. vim +/__bf_shf +70 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_xcvr.c 68 69 static const struct soc_enum tstmp_enum[] = { > 70 SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(FSL_XCVR_TX_DPTH_CNTR_CTRL, __bf_shf(FSL_XCVR_TX_DPTH_CNTR_CTRL_TSINC), 71 ARRAY_SIZE(inc_mode), inc_mode), 72 SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(FSL_XCVR_RX_DPTH_CNTR_CTRL, __bf_shf(FSL_XCVR_RX_DPTH_CNTR_CTRL_TSINC), 73 ARRAY_SIZE(inc_mode), inc_mode), 74 }; 75 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki