public inbox for llvm@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [trace:trace/for-next 27/40] kernel/trace/trace.c:1967:6: error: no member named 'd_max_latency' in 'struct trace_array'; did you mean 'max_latency'?
@ 2026-02-09 13:21 kernel test robot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-02-09 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven Rostedt; +Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace trace/for-next
head:   c4f1fe47b106e9200cbb1b8951bd75f036d53bd3
commit: ba73713da50e5c24499ca8941171593466ea34f7 [27/40] tracing: Clean up use of trace_create_maxlat_file()
config: arm64-randconfig-003-20260209 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260209/202602092133.fTdojd95-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project cd708029e0b2869e80abe31ddb175f7c35361f90)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260209/202602092133.fTdojd95-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602092133.fTdojd95-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> kernel/trace/trace.c:1967:6: error: no member named 'd_max_latency' in 'struct trace_array'; did you mean 'max_latency'?
    1967 |         tr->d_max_latency = trace_create_file("tracing_max_latency",
         |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |             max_latency
   kernel/trace/trace.h:348:17: note: 'max_latency' declared here
     348 |         unsigned long           max_latency;
         |                                 ^
   kernel/trace/trace.c:9789:23: warning: shift count is negative [-Wshift-count-negative]
    9789 |                     !((1ULL << i) & TOP_LEVEL_TRACE_FLAGS)) {
         |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/trace/trace.c:523:9: note: expanded from macro 'TOP_LEVEL_TRACE_FLAGS'
     523 |                TRACE_ITER(PROF_TEXT_OFFSET) | FPROFILE_DEFAULT_FLAGS)
         |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/trace/trace.h:1439:42: note: expanded from macro 'TRACE_ITER'
    1439 |         (TRACE_ITER_##flag##_BIT < 0 ? 0 : 1ULL << (TRACE_ITER_##flag##_BIT))
         |                                                 ^  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   1 warning and 1 error generated.


vim +1967 kernel/trace/trace.c

  1959	
  1960	static void trace_create_maxlat_file(struct trace_array *tr,
  1961					     struct dentry *d_tracer)
  1962	{
  1963	#ifdef LATENCY_FS_NOTIFY
  1964		INIT_WORK(&tr->fsnotify_work, latency_fsnotify_workfn);
  1965		init_irq_work(&tr->fsnotify_irqwork, latency_fsnotify_workfn_irq);
  1966	#endif
> 1967		tr->d_max_latency = trace_create_file("tracing_max_latency",
  1968						      TRACE_MODE_WRITE,
  1969						      d_tracer, tr,
  1970						      &tracing_max_lat_fops);
  1971	}
  1972	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-02-09 13:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-02-09 13:21 [trace:trace/for-next 27/40] kernel/trace/trace.c:1967:6: error: no member named 'd_max_latency' in 'struct trace_array'; did you mean 'max_latency'? kernel test robot

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox