From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 455C3374165; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 13:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770643331; cv=none; b=nO057yI/kPBYwpO1TdgIeKytN9A28vc1/F/xot3F4O7ON8P7M3kczD2v2MDS/nu9EQmmcAY5ni1UINrWyUAE5D/XXzTn34dYgHZLozD3fqHtH/+2Jl7ssjvopKGx3FlTXArQ1i44tu6ggi8e1caetlk5lQ/FgWFYPD4lobEi5Pc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770643331; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YdxQc3cQwP9XuHywZ41i1xHy/XfNJbBjyXeY7xbXAbI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID; b=Dz7uSuEUL/RadaThiYXDZj111TO9Olct1o1EXFXTwMklmT9pcW6Z3J+CJp8/7fp5RFUpROSQpN7LXysqRQqHzKO7ULYs4h+I+C0W/4G3RGDZ0bV23DODauBHNp4A81ioyCFgDB3BAlmpy1LVtN3IugXZJFjfFLz94XcDfIJJmmE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=SbGil4U/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="SbGil4U/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770643331; x=1802179331; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id; bh=YdxQc3cQwP9XuHywZ41i1xHy/XfNJbBjyXeY7xbXAbI=; b=SbGil4U/inDrbTqCvqIyeIPvWtO9X9bbv75DtBNM8UrnAoALo1mZhRaX SYGh+gJa0xcE64mLOgrh8tZXwqvaTdpKE/k+khoWiXS0ZE/svAJDHu2xW XhGMtLOTwGoUfQghoALT5EREJJ8n42UbDZ45Jcar/oDk9QtaS+qMPEYcc x1/qitpdimopoAwTrDEMDNbZCqnBA+LcODOlgRs6CAjupgchzpNx+0az8 s4KgYgDzVzbBM2t/FuUs0FvH6xNewkSq+YLrKMYZxBCQ2XXl3PPZqqbNy YS8cGBRWhr26S0qTgQWE6u5w9vCp6hyKfJ7OyZtf5HmAPio9CF2MXy2uv w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: heRSexGDRYW4t+YRf3TbxA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: NIatcxo7TfaS7VDV+AKCNg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11696"; a="71816101" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,282,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="71816101" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2026 05:22:10 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: LWoGoaPWShuk7Evp8yyDzw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: NYDaygtaT06fsakmWAa/VQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,282,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="211407565" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 765f4a05e27f) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2026 05:22:09 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 765f4a05e27f with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vpRDK-00000000nOr-3GcL; Mon, 09 Feb 2026 13:22:06 +0000 Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2026 21:21:27 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Steven Rostedt Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: [trace:trace/for-next 27/40] kernel/trace/trace.c:1967:6: error: no member named 'd_max_latency' in 'struct trace_array'; did you mean 'max_latency'? Message-ID: <202602092133.fTdojd95-lkp@intel.com> User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.25 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace trace/for-next head: c4f1fe47b106e9200cbb1b8951bd75f036d53bd3 commit: ba73713da50e5c24499ca8941171593466ea34f7 [27/40] tracing: Clean up use of trace_create_maxlat_file() config: arm64-randconfig-003-20260209 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260209/202602092133.fTdojd95-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.1.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project cd708029e0b2869e80abe31ddb175f7c35361f90) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260209/202602092133.fTdojd95-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602092133.fTdojd95-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/trace/trace.c:1967:6: error: no member named 'd_max_latency' in 'struct trace_array'; did you mean 'max_latency'? 1967 | tr->d_max_latency = trace_create_file("tracing_max_latency", | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ | max_latency kernel/trace/trace.h:348:17: note: 'max_latency' declared here 348 | unsigned long max_latency; | ^ kernel/trace/trace.c:9789:23: warning: shift count is negative [-Wshift-count-negative] 9789 | !((1ULL << i) & TOP_LEVEL_TRACE_FLAGS)) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/trace/trace.c:523:9: note: expanded from macro 'TOP_LEVEL_TRACE_FLAGS' 523 | TRACE_ITER(PROF_TEXT_OFFSET) | FPROFILE_DEFAULT_FLAGS) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/trace/trace.h:1439:42: note: expanded from macro 'TRACE_ITER' 1439 | (TRACE_ITER_##flag##_BIT < 0 ? 0 : 1ULL << (TRACE_ITER_##flag##_BIT)) | ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 warning and 1 error generated. vim +1967 kernel/trace/trace.c 1959 1960 static void trace_create_maxlat_file(struct trace_array *tr, 1961 struct dentry *d_tracer) 1962 { 1963 #ifdef LATENCY_FS_NOTIFY 1964 INIT_WORK(&tr->fsnotify_work, latency_fsnotify_workfn); 1965 init_irq_work(&tr->fsnotify_irqwork, latency_fsnotify_workfn_irq); 1966 #endif > 1967 tr->d_max_latency = trace_create_file("tracing_max_latency", 1968 TRACE_MODE_WRITE, 1969 d_tracer, tr, 1970 &tracing_max_lat_fops); 1971 } 1972 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki