From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF9555478D for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2026 17:01:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770915713; cv=none; b=EU7jTg75YVp8MFR1cklvSW1V/tz5RucjOqZH8t3UZaEwPMKFJiWNl2CmjOE7m3jZgbLVN36zPTZm6yOkx33JK4H0vR9yw5II+TWFyWQVlwp4HSwaSHu8MtqyvU51qZjqXjIMhUY45dCIOv6J30XgU22foG5N8p0MysOr8IvYLT8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770915713; c=relaxed/simple; bh=b7T33PJtvGBPBtpcmkzCx4thk7d25jUwSrCF9Ynrzv4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=JHeieFjTtqugWNn2kZHO0MxxR+4qDW0Mc4kfJBAx+HWNTQ70jwLSAqt0HI94k9WtRaoBW58MuYiNLAejzBWaw7fegEIFLpPvtmbh5ElevlphwZ6qP12sCwBFMEKExZjHEnnETRNigFcRmCQW1JKePCt1e1KsIdNRaTTH6/LhkL0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Dsiychv+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Dsiychv+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1AFFAC4CEF7; Thu, 12 Feb 2026 17:01:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1770915713; bh=b7T33PJtvGBPBtpcmkzCx4thk7d25jUwSrCF9Ynrzv4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Dsiychv+cru1SEtLn+e4+RUGEQzYFvDRs5vejhLYoaY1CVQ0nbCwcoucuhuFYWSKf xcIhLxgkEdiZScfDXJfKGEin8Axa8weELzwh9sow9UQdbc6zhMMH8Gto0JG9kqfR/N XRp63+4L386/zg9I85f1ypC3BXNuXfH901hZ5cBYCoo98Pf9JYKVg967HQChtpRf/b dFBLl+P9CbQa3BrA7SfqzECtcSkivtsWaiDPLcZ6ECvP5Al1pBCer0GJzHuhU71pbR +o/ZZfq2BCdqZnYAFii3QYOfy2XDDgGnvy/iue+qJg8W0iB8l74tRprf3E3RdN3fIN H/zNbQ6jyIDoQ== Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 12:01:49 -0500 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Aaron Ballman Cc: Miguel Ojeda , Marco Elver , clang-built-linux , Peter Zijlstra , Bart Van Assche , "Jose E. Marchesi" Subject: Re: Clang/LLVM 'main' regression testing and -Wthread-safety Message-ID: <20260212170149.GB1036664@ax162> References: <177076109527.3702729.10282954256881857059.pr-tracker-bot@kernel.org> <20260211195139.GB3482274@ax162> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 07:22:26AM -0500, Aaron Ballman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 2:51 PM Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > It has always been on my backburner to try and get a build of the Linux > > kernel as part of LLVM's continuous integration but I have never had the > > time to sit down and interface with folks to see what exactly that > > entails (I figured it would involve integration with LLVM's build bot > > infrastructure but I have not dug in super hard to the documentation). > > An arm64 and x86_64 defconfig build would probably catch quite a bit of > > initial breakage and it would be easy to pin Linux's version and only > > bump it when thoroughly tested. > > FWIW, I continue to be in full support of adding post-commit CI > resources for testing Linux kernel needs. I'm not super familiar with > the infrastructure side of things, but I'm happy to help make > connections with the folks who do know if it's of help. Yes, I would greatly appreciate that! I would like to see what it would entail in full, as I could potentially carve out some time this quarter or next to actually get it going since it would be beneficial for both sides. Cheers, Nathan