From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B548830594F; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 20:12:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772050355; cv=none; b=K64a8sep2f9b6bVr+dSYyfT3U0qD6xwMx68blQM0+yM0Jd/itRX98CWRA3dL4UVWLBx0JNMO7a3/trsixFUsrk4qTgWJ+6G2LVX1e4VZ/+bwJuktXSXYd1WX7yKwYkyDiylg3x1sqPc+8hLzK1ON0nbq6M0iFv3qDxIvRDOdC0Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772050355; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QxicpVh7AXHk9Sz78Y5Hq+TByPNNANQV8C4vSxuSC78=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iMMFkiQyA1IpEbgHB42GWdvaICFipaxC+UbXEhhBGsTT9Webl4nZTLuijn+FF5b+C/qTBgCxH43gFdUaGwF9ysLChXaePmWZX71sFtqg1Xfk2QnFfNAiKRYRytrTEXD0NckRYRZjNQxSurC22PR6FqHRWxZhotKXb6QLgfg/Mro= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=rBj75RVy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="rBj75RVy" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DFD6C116D0; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 20:12:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772050355; bh=QxicpVh7AXHk9Sz78Y5Hq+TByPNNANQV8C4vSxuSC78=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rBj75RVyZCKhmRCiz4Y5iFzaQH6PS+s4fGYVaTlLRCy4VoigSxZFlMxqkbWOd/Tvy 1LXS8yM6K6rYBt1Ymhme3P4e77crkmZCTC+VnROryN0/RbccK6B3YY6JIcq6lMcpRk pHG9dU3dCLuO5qWtMlPk5dMtecgCMvlq7qirkHnZs6Tx+BCFzLMQx4HBt6h/0jP95q m7JveTUjYwlTqActtxHL+equqVFPAidCmHiwlk6Wt5tLSUhTEixRx/MsuAtWGDX/ZH iIn/E9/7zYgfzSAbeSFaxy8uRkC0kD85ditnCdD2vBFkJM8fDcrIeWw6WI9lg6grou HW31ggYeF7aKw== Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 13:12:31 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org Subject: Re: Prebuilt LLVM 22.1.0 uploaded Message-ID: <20260225201231.GF2755225@ax162> References: <20260225014834.GA1284670@ax162> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 11:55:24AM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 2:48 AM Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > > I have built and uploaded LLVM 22.1.0 to > > https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/llvm/. > > As usual, thanks Nathan. I will test the new major. > > Speaking of new major versions -- for the Rust "latest" combined ones, > should they be LLVM 22 or 21? i.e. isn't the "latest" set is meant to > match the LLVM major number? On the other hand, it probably works > anyway, and whoever cares about LTO should use the matching. But in > that case perhaps we should update the wording at the top of the page. Hmmm, yeah good point. I had interpreted it as "latest LLVM version" not "latest LLVM stable version of the corresponding major version". I guess I had figured CONFIG_RUSTC_CLANG_LLVM_COMPATIBLE would help prevent any problems and most users would probably prefer the latest version of each tool, rather than the compatible ones, which are still available. I will work on a wording update there (or just revert back to 21.1.8 for those until Rust has LLVM 22 merged). Cheers, Nathan