* Re: [RFC PATCH 06/11] mm/truncate: use folio_split() in truncate_inode_partial_folio()
[not found] <20260323190644.1714379-7-ziy@nvidia.com>
@ 2026-03-24 17:00 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-03-24 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zi Yan; +Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all
Hi Zi,
[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
[cannot apply to brauner-vfs/vfs.all kdave/for-next linus/master v7.0-rc5 next-20260323]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Zi-Yan/mm-remove-READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS-Kconfig-option/20260324-043510
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260323190644.1714379-7-ziy%40nvidia.com
patch subject: [RFC PATCH 06/11] mm/truncate: use folio_split() in truncate_inode_partial_folio()
config: x86_64-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260325/202603250033.ifbSFRek-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260325/202603250033.ifbSFRek-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603250033.ifbSFRek-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> mm/truncate.c:189:8: error: call to undeclared function 'folio_split'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
189 | ret = folio_split(folio, min_order, split_at, NULL);
| ^
1 error generated.
vim +/folio_split +189 mm/truncate.c
179
180 static int folio_split_or_unmap(struct folio *folio, struct page *split_at,
181 unsigned long min_order)
182 {
183 enum ttu_flags ttu_flags =
184 TTU_SYNC |
185 TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD |
186 TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK;
187 int ret;
188
> 189 ret = folio_split(folio, min_order, split_at, NULL);
190
191 /*
192 * If the split fails, unmap the folio, so it will be refaulted
193 * with PTEs to respect SIGBUS semantics.
194 *
195 * Make an exception for shmem/tmpfs that for long time
196 * intentionally mapped with PMDs across i_size.
197 */
198 if (ret && !shmem_mapping(folio->mapping)) {
199 try_to_unmap(folio, ttu_flags);
200 WARN_ON(folio_mapped(folio));
201 }
202
203 return ret;
204 }
205
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-03-24 17:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20260323190644.1714379-7-ziy@nvidia.com>
2026-03-24 17:00 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] mm/truncate: use folio_split() in truncate_inode_partial_folio() kernel test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox