From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
miklos@szeredi.hu, bschubert@ddn.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 8/9] fuse: add zero-copy over io-uring
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2026 14:53:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202603281401.HP3uX5G1-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324224532.3733468-9-joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Hi Joanne,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on mszeredi-fuse/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v7.0-rc5 next-20260327]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Joanne-Koong/fuse-separate-next-request-fetching-from-sending-logic/20260328-142620
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/fuse.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260324224532.3733468-9-joannelkoong%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v1 8/9] fuse: add zero-copy over io-uring
config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260328/202603281401.HP3uX5G1-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260328/202603281401.HP3uX5G1-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603281401.HP3uX5G1-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:132:3: error: call to undeclared function 'io_buffer_unregister'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
132 | io_buffer_unregister(ent->cmd, ent->id, issue_flags);
| ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:132:3: note: did you mean 'io_buffer_unregister_bvec'?
include/linux/io_uring/cmd.h:188:5: note: 'io_buffer_unregister_bvec' declared here
188 | int io_buffer_unregister_bvec(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int index,
| ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:317:17: error: call to undeclared function 'io_uring_registered_mem_region_get'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
317 | mem_reg_addr = io_uring_registered_mem_region_get(cmd, &nr_pages,
| ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:317:15: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'void *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion]
317 | mem_reg_addr = io_uring_registered_mem_region_get(cmd, &nr_pages,
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
318 | issue_flags);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:356:8: error: call to undeclared function 'io_uring_buf_ring_pin'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
356 | err = io_uring_buf_ring_pin(cmd, FUSE_URING_BUFRING_GROUP, issue_flags,
| ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:361:7: error: call to undeclared function 'io_uring_is_kmbuf_ring'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
361 | if (!io_uring_is_kmbuf_ring(cmd, FUSE_URING_BUFRING_GROUP, issue_flags))
| ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:372:2: error: call to undeclared function 'io_uring_buf_ring_unpin'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
372 | io_uring_buf_ring_unpin(cmd, FUSE_URING_BUFRING_GROUP, issue_flags);
| ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:425:4: error: call to undeclared function 'io_uring_buf_ring_unpin'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
425 | io_uring_buf_ring_unpin(cmd, FUSE_URING_BUFRING_GROUP,
| ^
>> fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:859:11: error: use of undeclared identifier 'IO_BUF_DEST'
859 | ddir |= IO_BUF_DEST;
| ^
>> fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:861:11: error: use of undeclared identifier 'IO_BUF_SOURCE'
861 | ddir |= IO_BUF_SOURCE;
| ^
>> fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:883:11: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 5, have 8
881 | err = io_buffer_register_bvec(ent->cmd, bvs, ap->num_folios,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
882 | fuse_zero_copy_release, zc_bvs,
883 | ddir, ent->id,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
884 | issue_flags);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/io_uring/cmd.h:185:5: note: 'io_buffer_register_bvec' declared here
185 | int io_buffer_register_bvec(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, struct request *rq,
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
186 | void (*release)(void *), unsigned int index,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
187 | unsigned int issue_flags);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:1013:8: error: call to undeclared function 'io_ring_buffer_select'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
1013 | sel = io_ring_buffer_select(cmd_to_io_kiocb(ent->cmd), &len,
| ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:1013:8: note: did you mean 'io_uring_cmd_buffer_select'?
include/linux/io_uring/cmd.h:83:18: note: 'io_uring_cmd_buffer_select' declared here
83 | struct io_br_sel io_uring_cmd_buffer_select(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd,
| ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:1013:6: error: assigning to 'struct io_br_sel' from incompatible type 'int'
1013 | sel = io_ring_buffer_select(cmd_to_io_kiocb(ent->cmd), &len,
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1014 | ent->queue->bufring.list, issue_flags);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:1017:11: error: no member named 'kaddr' in 'struct io_br_sel'; did you mean 'addr'?
1017 | if (!sel.kaddr)
| ^~~~~
| addr
include/linux/io_uring_types.h:100:16: note: 'addr' declared here
100 | void __user *addr;
| ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:1020:35: error: no member named 'kaddr' in 'struct io_br_sel'; did you mean 'addr'?
1020 | ent->payload_kvec.iov_base = sel.kaddr;
| ^~~~~
| addr
include/linux/io_uring_types.h:100:16: note: 'addr' declared here
100 | void __user *addr;
| ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:1022:20: error: no member named 'buf_id' in 'struct io_br_sel'
1022 | ent->buf_id = sel.buf_id;
| ~~~ ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:1038:15: error: call to undeclared function 'io_uring_kmbuf_recycle'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
1038 | WARN_ON_ONCE(io_uring_kmbuf_recycle(ent->cmd, FUSE_URING_BUFRING_GROUP,
| ^
16 errors generated.
vim +/io_buffer_unregister +132 fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
110
111 static void fuse_uring_req_end(struct fuse_ring_ent *ent, struct fuse_req *req,
112 int error, unsigned issue_flags)
113 {
114 struct fuse_ring_queue *queue = ent->queue;
115 struct fuse_ring *ring = queue->ring;
116 struct fuse_conn *fc = ring->fc;
117
118 lockdep_assert_not_held(&queue->lock);
119 spin_lock(&queue->lock);
120 ent->fuse_req = NULL;
121 list_del_init(&req->list);
122 if (test_bit(FR_BACKGROUND, &req->flags)) {
123 queue->active_background--;
124 spin_lock(&fc->bg_lock);
125 fuse_uring_flush_bg(queue);
126 spin_unlock(&fc->bg_lock);
127 }
128
129 spin_unlock(&queue->lock);
130
131 if (ent->zero_copied) {
> 132 io_buffer_unregister(ent->cmd, ent->id, issue_flags);
133 ent->zero_copied = false;
134 }
135
136 if (error)
137 req->out.h.error = error;
138
139 clear_bit(FR_SENT, &req->flags);
140 fuse_request_end(req);
141 }
142
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-28 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260324224532.3733468-9-joannelkoong@gmail.com>
2026-03-28 13:53 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-03-30 15:43 ` [PATCH v1 8/9] fuse: add zero-copy over io-uring Joanne Koong
2026-03-31 3:35 ` Philip Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202603281401.HP3uX5G1-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bschubert@ddn.com \
--cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox