Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Ignore HPD when in DPLL enable/disable cycle

[kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>]

Hi Suraj,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on drm-i915/for-linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on drm-i915/for-linux-next-fixes drm-tip/drm-tip linus/master v7.0 next-20260421]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Suraj-Kandpal/drm-i915-dp-Ignore-HPD-when-in-DPLL-enable-disable-cycle/20260422-031647
base:   https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel.git for-linux-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260417080118.2352283-1-suraj.kandpal%40intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Ignore HPD when in DPLL enable/disable cycle
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260422/202604220938.18Kkm7Pt-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
rustc: rustc 1.88.0 (6b00bc388 2025-06-23)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260422/202604220938.18Kkm7Pt-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202604220938.18Kkm7Pt-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c:6834:62: error: too few arguments provided to function-like macro invocation
    6834 |                 drm_dbg_kms("Ignoring HPD since DPLL is getting disabled\n");
         |                                                                            ^
   include/drm/drm_print.h:652:9: note: macro 'drm_dbg_kms' defined here
     652 | #define drm_dbg_kms(drm, fmt, ...)                                      \
         |         ^
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c:6834:3: error: use of undeclared identifier 'drm_dbg_kms'
    6834 |                 drm_dbg_kms("Ignoring HPD since DPLL is getting disabled\n");
         |                 ^
   2 errors generated.


vim +6834 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c

  6825	
  6826	enum irqreturn
  6827	intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port, bool long_hpd)
  6828	{
  6829		struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(dig_port);
  6830		struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &dig_port->dp;
  6831		u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE];
  6832	
  6833		if (atomic_read(&dig_port->link_teardown)) {
> 6834			drm_dbg_kms("Ignoring HPD since DPLL is getting disabled\n");
  6835			return IRQ_NONE;
  6836		}
  6837	
  6838		if (dig_port->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP &&
  6839		    (long_hpd ||
  6840		     intel_display_rpm_suspended(display) ||
  6841		     !intel_pps_have_panel_power_or_vdd(intel_dp))) {
  6842			/*
  6843			 * vdd off can generate a long/short pulse on eDP which
  6844			 * would require vdd on to handle it, and thus we
  6845			 * would end up in an endless cycle of
  6846			 * "vdd off -> long/short hpd -> vdd on -> detect -> vdd off -> ..."
  6847			 */
  6848			drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
  6849				    "ignoring %s hpd on eDP [ENCODER:%d:%s]\n",
  6850				    long_hpd ? "long" : "short",
  6851				    dig_port->base.base.base.id,
  6852				    dig_port->base.base.name);
  6853			return IRQ_HANDLED;
  6854		}
  6855	
  6856		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "got hpd irq on [ENCODER:%d:%s] - %s\n",
  6857			    dig_port->base.base.base.id,
  6858			    dig_port->base.base.name,
  6859			    long_hpd ? "long" : "short");
  6860	
  6861		/*
  6862		 * TBT DP tunnels require the GFX driver to read out the DPRX caps in
  6863		 * response to long HPD pulses. The DP hotplug handler does that,
  6864		 * however the hotplug handler may be blocked by another
  6865		 * connector's/encoder's hotplug handler. Since the TBT CM may not
  6866		 * complete the DP tunnel BW request for the latter connector/encoder
  6867		 * waiting for this encoder's DPRX read, perform a dummy read here.
  6868		 */
  6869		if (long_hpd) {
  6870			intel_dp_dpcd_set_probe(intel_dp, true);
  6871	
  6872			intel_dp_read_dprx_caps(intel_dp, dpcd);
  6873	
  6874			intel_dp->reset_link_params = true;
  6875			intel_dp_invalidate_source_oui(intel_dp);
  6876	
  6877			return IRQ_NONE;
  6878		}
  6879	
  6880		if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
  6881			if (!intel_dp_check_mst_status(intel_dp))
  6882				return IRQ_NONE;
  6883		} else if (!intel_dp_short_pulse(intel_dp)) {
  6884			return IRQ_NONE;
  6885		}
  6886	
  6887		return IRQ_HANDLED;
  6888	}
  6889	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki