From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDE6F387369; Sat, 30 May 2026 07:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780125710; cv=none; b=pCEeS756Qfkt8y9Ykl1Fm4psPi0Sh2HpxBhb+9azAhcdnsT/7AgQeySqdScUuJCGZ6hmUdyVT4w+eu4UYuTQkxN5KYxG1HuFIinJtz+OqcKPVbhWi5tVT3DmaskLX0Nw1DcuRG/V3VsXQRpMshDfOMKYVNyVFSZOmfjqiw1oHp4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780125710; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SKtIHjcxbsa8b88YmfrKc376yFEcKAQ3wnPjdzv7THE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID; b=dsX1l9dPo16it4d82N6TAx6tTvOBx2aAwQ2dJM1iZ8ozMRZSK4ssHSfr/YYOwov1gKqFm0oGkpiL6swlHFYlK+j21xgwCHRfz605iMsCMcsWpGwFgb/OBSP19e+KAvOMRxL1F8NJqax6XKMi32xoJ806j3ZYoyLZGczYZax6FEM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=QN/Xj6II; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="QN/Xj6II" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1780125709; x=1811661709; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id; bh=SKtIHjcxbsa8b88YmfrKc376yFEcKAQ3wnPjdzv7THE=; b=QN/Xj6IIlq1PvFtmJbWoR/jdwaAcGQJbcFCupUDsSZGz/gs4mvmvYimg tV0cv0AITwvimCj5vO9Sw2wws2n0spCXeA/7sNcwGy78SqIFQPS+e32FD CHMlFrlwL/Re9eEvygAbcaY5giZso8v/te3jsL9zu5Pm37nfEmpKfODIZ WZEsNz9Fs1NKYbb8lxbwkA++SnmoVSbVHN2fNjU2Wk+IbvSj/5BBg1I9B yrS6/qr0+vHUBAtoShhGG23mavsrh9EDMl0rOpEdpL+z/YpiRVZX0XuN0 VftYlg6d58SR997MbgH4F3myhks45RzupTwI3XWxKQk5E2eDWCRucwMNc w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: DLucv1lTSh2gctNN709DxA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: txdPI0nnQlemdodj7S6E8g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11801"; a="80820963" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,176,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="80820963" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by fmvoesa111.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 May 2026 00:21:48 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: h31a8cYER0KBsgSg3IIYOg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Hd+ExlLPQJ2ppiYTGVRGGg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,176,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="243147384" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO 892db79562d4) ([10.211.93.152]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 May 2026 00:21:47 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 892db79562d4 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wTE0u-00000000153-1BRB; Sat, 30 May 2026 07:21:44 +0000 Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 09:21:26 +0200 From: kernel test robot To: Brian Cain Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: [bcain:bcain/boot_qemu 42/43] mm/mm_init.c:920:18: error: no member named 'pageblock_flags' in 'struct zone' Message-ID: <202605300909.7HlejklT-lkp@intel.com> User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.25 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bcain/linux.git bcain/boot_qemu head: dea73df6b6f456832390a9acd2c44cf235110d30 commit: a2a98cd08700b29ee25458e078d1c20cc3cb4131 [42/43] mm: guard pageblock init against missing pageblock_flags config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260530/202605300909.7HlejklT-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260530/202605300909.7HlejklT-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202605300909.7HlejklT-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> mm/mm_init.c:920:18: error: no member named 'pageblock_flags' in 'struct zone' 920 | if (likely(z->pageblock_flags)) { | ~ ^ include/linux/compiler.h:76:40: note: expanded from macro 'likely' 76 | # define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1) | ^ 1 error generated. vim +920 mm/mm_init.c 887 888 for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; ) { 889 /* 890 * There can be holes in boot-time mem_map[]s handed to this 891 * function. They do not exist on hotplugged memory. 892 */ 893 if (context == MEMINIT_EARLY) { 894 if (overlap_memmap_init(zone, &pfn)) 895 continue; 896 if (defer_init(nid, pfn, zone_end_pfn)) { 897 deferred_struct_pages = true; 898 break; 899 } 900 } 901 902 page = pfn_to_page(pfn); 903 __init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid); 904 if (context == MEMINIT_HOTPLUG) { 905 #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE 906 if (zone == ZONE_DEVICE) 907 __SetPageReserved(page); 908 else 909 #endif 910 __SetPageOffline(page); 911 } 912 913 /* 914 * Usually, we want to mark the pageblock MIGRATE_MOVABLE, 915 * such that unmovable allocations won't be scattered all 916 * over the place during system boot. 917 */ 918 if (pageblock_aligned(pfn)) { 919 struct zone *z = page_zone(page); > 920 if (likely(z->pageblock_flags)) { 921 init_pageblock_migratetype(page, migratetype, 922 isolate_pageblock); 923 } else { 924 pr_warn_once("memmap_init_range: skipping pageblock init for pfn 0x%lx (zone %s has no pageblock_flags)\n", 925 pfn, z->name); 926 } 927 cond_resched(); 928 } 929 pfn++; 930 } 931 } 932 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki