From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
0day robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1166:9: error: call to undeclared function 'FIELD_GET'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 07:12:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202606050731.hnLOapOi-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chengwen-Feng/PCI-TPH-Fix-pcie_tph_get_st_table_loc-field-extraction/20260604-214853
head: 345c2b0902fb86eb32cf8fadfdfb114490531b81
commit: 345c2b0902fb86eb32cf8fadfdfb114490531b81 vfio/pci: Virtualize PCIe TPH capability registers
date: 15 hours ago
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260605/202606050731.hnLOapOi-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f43d6834093b19baf79beda8c0337ab020ac5f17)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260605/202606050731.hnLOapOi-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606050731.hnLOapOi-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1166:9: error: call to undeclared function 'FIELD_GET'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
1166 | mode = FIELD_GET(PCI_TPH_CTRL_MODE_SEL_MASK, data);
| ^
1 error generated.
vim +/FIELD_GET +1166 drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
1127
1128 static int vfio_find_cap_start(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int pos);
1129 static int vfio_tph_config_write(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int pos,
1130 int count, struct perm_bits *perm,
1131 int offset, __le32 val)
1132 {
1133 int req_en_byte = PCI_TPH_CTRL + 1;
1134 struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev;
1135 __le32 org_val = 0;
1136 bool extended;
1137 u8 mode, req;
1138 int i, ret;
1139 u16 start;
1140 u32 data;
1141
1142 if (!vdev->tph_permit)
1143 return count;
1144
1145 /* Back up the original values in order rollback when fail */
1146 if (offset <= req_en_byte && offset + count > req_en_byte)
1147 vfio_default_config_read(vdev, pos, count, perm, offset,
1148 &org_val);
1149
1150 ret = vfio_default_config_write(vdev, pos, count, perm, offset, val);
1151 if (ret != count)
1152 return ret;
1153
1154 /* Skip if write range does not cover Requester Enable byte */
1155 if (offset > req_en_byte || offset + count <= req_en_byte)
1156 return count;
1157
1158 ret = vfio_pci_set_power_state(vdev, PCI_D0);
1159 if (ret)
1160 return count;
1161
1162 mutex_lock(&vdev->tph_lock);
1163
1164 start = vfio_find_cap_start(vdev, pos);
1165 data = le32_to_cpu(*(__le32 *)&vdev->vconfig[start + PCI_TPH_CTRL]);
> 1166 mode = FIELD_GET(PCI_TPH_CTRL_MODE_SEL_MASK, data);
1167 req = FIELD_GET(PCI_TPH_CTRL_REQ_EN_MASK, data);
1168
1169 if (req == PCI_TPH_REQ_TPH_ONLY || req == PCI_TPH_REQ_EXT_TPH) {
1170 extended = !!(req == PCI_TPH_REQ_EXT_TPH);
1171 ret = pcie_enable_tph_explicit(pdev, mode, extended);
1172 if (!ret && vdev->tph_st_shadow) {
1173 for (i = 0; i < vdev->tph_st_entries; i++)
1174 pcie_tph_set_st_entry(pdev, i,
1175 vdev->tph_st_shadow[i]);
1176 }
1177 if (ret)
1178 vfio_default_config_write(vdev, pos, count, perm,
1179 offset, org_val);
1180 } else if (req == PCI_TPH_REQ_DISABLE) {
1181 pcie_disable_tph(vdev->pdev);
1182 } else {
1183 vfio_default_config_write(vdev, pos, count, perm, offset,
1184 org_val);
1185 }
1186
1187 mutex_unlock(&vdev->tph_lock);
1188
1189 return count;
1190 }
1191
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 5:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202606050731.hnLOapOi-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox