From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1A511A262A; Wed, 24 Jun 2026 21:48:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782337704; cv=none; b=uDYJy4VbyOxzHJADyfU04zHU+8Z4p2eSPSw443kh0340YfZwnP39wxvTOSnLg3YPjBFRnTyEkV8VfFi0Tr7s5BscaVVcUMrFZzdpXUbd+8ZPQ3qNrrCzW1VWs+gBIS9CmPwe/LjaeDzVAITyBUUx9XIlvcPdILjFbE330Jd+mpA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782337704; c=relaxed/simple; bh=J7tTuSQRC3HfbocAhNqi/eYeoUHCjQPzdj981PhH6FU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID; b=HLLZW4M2Q13Jo7Ec8tsf7XTTbHj87/WqoFn/w+nrGRpc36Jl+KJGntAGgZKxQ9BXCtrSlBj96+JndVYxIU3zPcZdKGv1+kVztS+cx++gDxQzvQgJYiYGQr6w5BSQOynrJC3Ru0r4wGVy3nWPtkHkP43iFkdkzf0eRuvD0ornptY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=iZAp5Ue4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="iZAp5Ue4" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1782337703; x=1813873703; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id; bh=J7tTuSQRC3HfbocAhNqi/eYeoUHCjQPzdj981PhH6FU=; b=iZAp5Ue4SN1GSfM+LFT8WUmYYfwY8NHhUtz/dk5L0IgboZXGMejZzYjw 48UEbpFAUFUkCV7RYy5t5q04m/sCua2gN4vxbU0Rp/4xHdX5FnAKU7VUP 6iplpGsD4sv5UZ8Xsppris6iWlQY6nSpCT4y7OnCAFZoT+KGpyXcRzGOs AFmSo3nC6LKUG4GrW77I8tgZCDnZLFp+a34xP9VaO4Ix+9vK//QBzy+Tp R7OMkxpiPZEtnfwmjQ6bJw66kYughkAU2TjhaVUS2prLv21jGfsdN6/yb UGcP6F6pASUPyHM9ylsrX2du5S68lv6bwtrhveLfaYO6wRKAoIzwbxDyT Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: jxOdFvHqS62qGgn3r1V2eQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: CdmZGEGvTc+Z9vivUwoSXA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11827"; a="83207380" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,223,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="83207380" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Jun 2026 14:48:22 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: PhjibrFBSGqeKeEp4dDBmw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: HkN6++KkSG6ykos0PLTbjw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,223,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="250307420" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO ea128546eb3d) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Jun 2026 14:48:20 -0700 Received: from kbuild by ea128546eb3d with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wcVRt-000000003gn-0s7b; Wed, 24 Jun 2026 21:48:03 +0000 Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 05:47:32 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Gregory Price Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: [gourryinverse:scratch/gourry/managed_nodes/rfc5 34/75] mm/mempolicy.c:1194:3: error: expected ')' Message-ID: <202606250535.hKlRhKft-lkp@intel.com> User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.25 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: tree: https://github.com/gourryinverse/linux scratch/gourry/managed_nodes/rfc5 head: 46a97233124f2cd0a55d11f159f5c975529ebb03 commit: 5a2689d32ea3ed6497b47864893666699f4bb999 [34/75] mm/mempolicy: add in-kernel MPOL_BIND interfaces for drivers/services config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260625/202606250535.hKlRhKft-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 22.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project e9846648fd6183ee6d8cbdb4502213fcf902a211) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260625/202606250535.hKlRhKft-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606250535.hKlRhKft-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> mm/mempolicy.c:1194:3: error: expected ')' 1194 | return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); | ^ mm/mempolicy.c:1193:5: note: to match this '(' 1193 | if (!node_state(nid, N_MEMORY_PRIVATE) | ^ 1 error generated. vim +1194 mm/mempolicy.c 1172 1173 /** 1174 * mpol_private_bind - build an MPOL_BIND policy pinned to a private node 1175 * @nid: an N_MEMORY_PRIVATE node 1176 * 1177 * Returns a refcounted mempolicy that binds allocations to @nid with the 1178 * private-placement intent (MPOL_F_PRIVATE). This binds to @nid regardless 1179 * of the node's CAP_USER_NUMA, providing a privileged way for node-owners 1180 * to bind driver/service owned VMAs to the node. 1181 * 1182 * Like any MPOL_BIND it is relaxable: an unsatisfiable request falls back 1183 * rather than failing. 1184 * 1185 * Must be called while @nid is N_MEMORY_PRIVATE. 1186 * 1187 * The caller owns the reference and frees it with mpol_put(). 1188 * 1189 * Return: the policy, or an ERR_PTR on failure. 1190 */ 1191 struct mempolicy *mpol_private_bind(int nid) 1192 { 1193 if (!node_state(nid, N_MEMORY_PRIVATE) > 1194 return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); 1195 return __mpol_bind_node(nid, MPOL_F_PRIVATE); 1196 } 1197 EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(mpol_private_bind, "kmem"); 1198 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki