From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Linus Walleij" <linusw@kernel.org>,
"Sami Tolvanen" <samitolvanen@google.com>,
"Zhen Lei" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Michał Pecio" <michal.pecio@gmail.com>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
"Bill Wendling" <morbo@google.com>,
"Justin Stitt" <justinstitt@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: traps: Implement KCFI trap handler for ARM32
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:11:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260721001159.GA3326792@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715175223.make.153-kees@kernel.org>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 10:52:27AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> ARM32 GCC KCFI[1] violations currently show as generic "Oops - undefined
> instruction" errors, making debugging CFI failures difficult. Add a proper
> KCFI trap handler similar to the aarch64 implementation to provide clear
> CFI error messages, including the call target and the expected type.
>
> Clang and GCC trap CFI failures differently on ARM32. Clang lowers
> its checks to a BKPT, handled via the breakpoint/prefetch-abort path
> in hw_breakpoint.c, which cannot recover the target or expected type
> and so must report via report_cfi_failure_noaddr(). GCC instead lowers
> KCFI checks to a UDF (undefined instruction) whose immediate encodes
> the registers involved, so the handler can decode it and call the full
> report_cfi_failure() with the target and expected type.
>
> The GCC ARM32 KCFI implementation uses UDF instructions with a specific
> encoding pattern:
> - UDF instruction format: cccc 0111 1111 imm12 1111 imm4
> - 16-bit immediate reconstructed from bits 19-8 and 3-0
> - KCFI encoding: 0x8000 | (type_reg_num << 5) | (target_reg_num & 31)
> - Bit 15: KCFI trap identifier (0x8000)
> - Bits 9-5: Type ID register field (0x1F when unavailable)
> - Bits 4-0: Target address register number
>
> When the type register field is 0x1F (the type was spilled rather than
> kept in a register), the handler walks back up to 6 preceding
> instructions to recover the 32-bit type ID from the four EOR-immediate
> instructions the compiler emits, similar to x86 CFI trap reconstruction.
>
> The handler is dispatched directly from do_undefinstr() rather than
> through register_undef_hook(). A registered hook is only installed once
> initcalls run, so any KCFI violation that fires earlier in boot would be
> reported as a generic "undefined instruction"; calling the decoder from
> the exception handler itself catches failures from the very first
> instruction. Dispatching directly also lets the handler ignore
> non-kernel-mode UDFs, preventing a user process from spoofing the KCFI
> encoding.
>
> Both the UDF handler and the Clang breakpoint handler in hw_breakpoint.c
> act on the report_cfi_failure*() result identically (oops on a fatal
> violation, or skip the trapping instruction under CFI permissive mode)
> so factor that shared tail into arm_cfi_handle_failure(), declared in
> asm/traps.h.
>
> Link: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/20260618204539.824446-6-kees@kernel.org/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
I tested this in QEMU using LKDTM, which shows lkdtm_increment_int() as
the target of the failed call.
--
Cheers,
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 17:52 [PATCH v3] ARM: traps: Implement KCFI trap handler for ARM32 Kees Cook
2026-07-21 0:11 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2026-07-21 7:54 ` Linus Walleij
2026-07-21 16:15 ` Nick Desaulniers
2026-07-27 0:10 ` Karl Mehltretter
2026-07-27 1:28 ` Karl Mehltretter
2026-07-27 1:37 ` Karl Mehltretter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260721001159.GA3326792@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox