From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D27A43ABD82; Fri, 7 Aug 2026 05:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786078992; cv=none; b=n2eIBjSv/lnLWjNo4o/IBuTQLUjL7PTyoOhlBQIWl1Pwus3pGZhCE1Xs8gdBTTLNmkTkshpKDCBXVtR2J+fT1TJ0lwBoBkP0pbBxVeLVR2wKMcvc+gqEOnz+9II0wEV3isS+rLrCehFwfyPpKOOAu5EuhhyxuMHQlIA70pViXTs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786078992; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7/3GbuKzjuHuMHVYw9C/8iqZ7/xolDroB1KyzEJtYE0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=TsUJ/+foTeyRyFEyFtuOh7f9l5INT+poB2PTPfomlaG6HLvD9YwC9+0gSyg1gQut56qA6NNnvZpcBcdg/C0QMPdmpUTWo9pu3ReD/6MGYSLkqalj+mODi8vUYBlCJoHPjK86ZgUu4niBJmvj33xrTiuq0uOo9hcA/nTHzMdP8aI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=QDVG//93; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="QDVG//93" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1786078988; x=1817614988; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=7/3GbuKzjuHuMHVYw9C/8iqZ7/xolDroB1KyzEJtYE0=; b=QDVG//93q9fCMxa+BfDNEAZlBgnRszsELpXUVdLWKqSmOU8eEMLXsj1I C6ag66eGQH2ZRE/6AvdAdYqvliZQhguG17wHQW5yzmFIhKB+1BTbUnDkl 9CE6iNPBGg9+O+L8WkQkVuoXJoeDTmrNwXtLaYjYjKye2Tn9khRojf7gi tbNb3WAr8YkvPb8vtoGwjq6r8rlOpnvoKPDbtzA3fZPFLoHD5zNJuiFug RZJOODIVI0h7f8vxSCuSfe1UXOOiMeNRHZ/WX+qv6E0KpC4ZWiFhdZsq/ poWopXd3LWwOPHhkJiveraIepkN2COMj2ZMTTefnVvuA+1pFhdnaLqW4/ A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: DG1zH6hlTi+ziodphYPOkA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: o1ZfMNdbQ6q75wab23L+6g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11867"; a="86762816" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,209,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="86762816" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Aug 2026 22:03:00 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: +QcWvMRGQOSEIpLvcsvWzg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9trdEoYIS1u5QPAU5Tu7Zw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 6eda058d650d) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Aug 2026 22:02:58 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 6eda058d650d with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wsCjQ-00000000HED-0XzN; Fri, 07 Aug 2026 05:02:56 +0000 Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 13:02:19 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Tigran Mkrtchyan Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] nfs4: inject process namespace into COMPOUND tag Message-ID: <202608071235.7jvY6oOL-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260626151029.1516839-1-tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260626151029.1516839-1-tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de> Hi Tigran, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on trondmy-nfs/linux-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v7.2-rc6 next-20260806] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tigran-Mkrtchyan/nfs4-inject-process-namespace-into-COMPOUND-tag/20260806-105541 base: git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/linux-nfs.git linux-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260626151029.1516839-1-tigran.mkrtchyan%40desy.de patch subject: [PATCH] [RFC] nfs4: inject process namespace into COMPOUND tag config: loongarch-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260807/202608071235.7jvY6oOL-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 24.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 12df34b8469b8095359de8c249cb1b2753fadeea) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260807/202608071235.7jvY6oOL-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202608071235.7jvY6oOL-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c:1039:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'taks' 1039 | if (taks->tk_ns_inum != 0) { | ^~~~ fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c:1042:60: error: use of undeclared identifier 'taks' 1042 | hdr->taglen = snprintf(ns_tag, sizeof(ns_tag), "ns:%u", taks->tk_ns_inum); | ^~~~ 2 errors generated. vim +/taks +1039 fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c 1027 1028 static void encode_compound_hdr(struct xdr_stream *xdr, 1029 struct rpc_rqst *req, 1030 struct compound_hdr *hdr) 1031 { 1032 __be32 *p; 1033 1034 /* Inject namespace info into compound tag if not already set */ 1035 if (hdr->taglen == 0 && req->rq_task != NULL) { 1036 /* Use namespace info captured at task creation time */ 1037 struct rpc_task *task = req->rq_task; 1038 > 1039 if (taks->tk_ns_inum != 0) { 1040 char ns_tag[NFS4_MAXTAGLEN + 1]; 1041 1042 hdr->taglen = snprintf(ns_tag, sizeof(ns_tag), "ns:%u", taks->tk_ns_inum); 1043 if (hdr->taglen > NFS4_MAXTAGLEN) { 1044 hdr->taglen = NFS4_MAXTAGLEN; 1045 ns_tag[NFS4_MAXTAGLEN] = '\0'; 1046 } 1047 hdr->tag = ns_tag; 1048 } 1049 } 1050 1051 /* initialize running count of expected bytes in reply. 1052 * NOTE: the replied tag SHOULD be the same is the one sent, 1053 * but this is not required as a MUST for the server to do so. */ 1054 hdr->replen = 3 + hdr->taglen; 1055 1056 WARN_ON_ONCE(hdr->taglen > NFS4_MAXTAGLEN); 1057 encode_string(xdr, hdr->taglen, hdr->tag); 1058 p = reserve_space(xdr, 8); 1059 *p++ = cpu_to_be32(hdr->minorversion); 1060 hdr->nops_p = p; 1061 *p = cpu_to_be32(hdr->nops); 1062 } 1063 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki