From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 1/8] drm: Move sink link rates reading helpers out of i915
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 09:21:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202610160925.QJrMX394-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012-feat_link_cap-v3-1-7517f4aba0f3@bootlin.com>
Hi Kory,
[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on 34e9ab0182494d7599dc9759bc216550d814b396]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kory-Maincent/drm-Move-sink-link-rates-reading-helpers-out-of-i915/20261012-171056
base: 34e9ab0182494d7599dc9759bc216550d814b396
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261012-feat_link_cap-v3-1-7517f4aba0f3%40bootlin.com
patch subject: [PATCH RFC v3 1/8] drm: Move sink link rates reading helpers out of i915
config: loongarch-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261016/202610160925.QJrMX394-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project cd708029e0b2869e80abe31ddb175f7c35361f90)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261016/202610160925.QJrMX394-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202610160925.QJrMX394-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c:4947:7: error: call to undeclared function 'drm_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
4947 | if (!drm_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled(tunnel))
| ^
>> drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c:4954:9: error: call to undeclared function 'drm_dp_tunnel_128b132b_dprx_rates'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
4954 | return drm_dp_tunnel_128b132b_dprx_rates(tunnel);
| ^
drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c:4954:9: note: did you mean 'drm_dprx_128b132b_link_rates'?
drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c:4944:11: note: 'drm_dprx_128b132b_link_rates' declared here
4944 | static u8 drm_dprx_128b132b_link_rates(const struct drm_dp_tunnel *tunnel,
| ^
4945 | u8 uhbr_rates)
4946 | {
4947 | if (!drm_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled(tunnel))
4948 | return uhbr_rates;
4949 |
4950 | static_assert(DP_TUNNELING_10GBPS_PER_LANE_SUPPORT == DP_UHBR10 &&
4951 | DP_TUNNELING_13_5GBPS_PER_LANE_SUPPORT == DP_UHBR13_5 &&
4952 | DP_TUNNELING_20GBPS_PER_LANE_SUPPORT == DP_UHBR20);
4953 |
4954 | return drm_dp_tunnel_128b132b_dprx_rates(tunnel);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| drm_dprx_128b132b_link_rates
drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c:4960:16: error: call to undeclared function 'drm_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
4960 | if (tunnel && drm_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled(tunnel))
| ^
>> drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c:4961:10: error: call to undeclared function 'drm_dp_tunnel_128b132b_supported'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
4961 | return drm_dp_tunnel_128b132b_supported(tunnel);
| ^
drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c:4961:10: note: did you mean 'drm_dp_128b132b_supported'?
include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h:283:1: note: 'drm_dp_128b132b_supported' declared here
283 | drm_dp_128b132b_supported(const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
| ^
4 errors generated.
vim +/drm_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled +4947 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
4943
4944 static u8 drm_dprx_128b132b_link_rates(const struct drm_dp_tunnel *tunnel,
4945 u8 uhbr_rates)
4946 {
> 4947 if (!drm_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled(tunnel))
4948 return uhbr_rates;
4949
4950 static_assert(DP_TUNNELING_10GBPS_PER_LANE_SUPPORT == DP_UHBR10 &&
4951 DP_TUNNELING_13_5GBPS_PER_LANE_SUPPORT == DP_UHBR13_5 &&
4952 DP_TUNNELING_20GBPS_PER_LANE_SUPPORT == DP_UHBR20);
4953
> 4954 return drm_dp_tunnel_128b132b_dprx_rates(tunnel);
4955 }
4956
4957 static bool drm_dprx_supports_128b132b(const struct drm_dp_tunnel *tunnel,
4958 const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
4959 {
> 4960 if (tunnel && drm_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled(tunnel))
> 4961 return drm_dp_tunnel_128b132b_supported(tunnel);
4962 else
4963 return drm_dp_128b132b_supported(dpcd);
4964 }
4965
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20261012-feat_link_cap-v3-1-7517f4aba0f3@bootlin.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202610160925.QJrMX394-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox