From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <llvm@lists.linux.dev>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/resctrl: Annotate get_mem_config() functions as __init
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:15:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2deb3b0c-121c-4dfb-9179-e919582f5bb4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240917-x86-restctrl-get_mem_config_intel-init-v3-1-10d521256284@kernel.org>
On 9/17/24 9:02 AM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> After a recent LLVM change [1] that deduces __cold on functions that
> only call cold code (such as __init functions), there is a section
> mismatch warning from __get_mem_config_intel(), which got moved to
> .text.unlikely. as a result of that optimization:
>
> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: __get_mem_config_intel+0x77 (section: .text.unlikely.) -> thread_throttle_mode_init (section: .init.text)
>
> Mark __get_mem_config_intel() as __init as well since it is only called
> from __init code, which clears up the warning.
>
> While __rdt_get_mem_config_amd() does not exhibit a warning because it
> does not call any __init code, it is a similar function that is only
> called from __init code like __get_mem_config_intel(), so mark it __init
> as well to keep the code symmetrical.
>
> Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6b11573b8c5e3d36beee099dbe7347c2a007bf53 [1]
> Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> ---
If there is a re-spin I think appropriate Fixes tags can be added:
Fixes: 05b93417ce5b ("x86/intel_rdt/mba: Add primary support for Memory Bandwidth Allocation (MBA)")
Fixes: 4d05bf71f157 ("x86/resctrl: Introduce AMD QOS feature")
I am not familiar with stable rules related to compiler impact but
this may fall into the "it bothers people" category of fixes so
a Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org sounds appropriate also.
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-19 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-17 16:02 [PATCH v3] x86/resctrl: Annotate get_mem_config() functions as __init Nathan Chancellor
2024-09-19 21:15 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2024-09-20 9:37 ` Nathan Chancellor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2deb3b0c-121c-4dfb-9179-e919582f5bb4@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox