From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: llvm <llvm@lists.linux.dev>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@meta.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/12] x86/mm: add INVLPGB support code
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:20:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44837964d67d6f35a20139fbe310f621141a0404.camel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202501171121.nQcwVI41-lkp@intel.com>
On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 11:37 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
> compiler: clang version 19.1.3
> (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b25
> 4b6afab99)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250117/202501171121.nQcwVI
> 41-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/invlpgb.h:26:49: error: invalid input size
> > > for constraint 'a'
> 26 | asm volatile(".byte 0x0f, 0x01, 0xfe" : : "a"
> (rax), "c" (ecx), "d" (edx));
> | ^
>
What do I do about this?
It didn't used to complain when we had a named
assembler operator there:
asm volatile("invlpgb" : : "a" (rax), "c" (ecx), "d" (edx));
However, now that we're using .byte for compatibility
with older binutils, things break with newer llvm?
--
All Rights Reversed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-17 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250116023127.1531583-6-riel@surriel.com>
2025-01-17 3:37 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] x86/mm: add INVLPGB support code kernel test robot
2025-01-17 14:20 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2025-01-17 15:01 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44837964d67d6f35a20139fbe310f621141a0404.camel@surriel.com \
--to=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox