From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: Ensure flags in lock guard is consistently initialized
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 07:22:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61d1b49c-e2ef-4a43-942d-6e321d4be8c8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250513-irq-guards-fix-flags-init-v1-1-1dca3f5992d6@kernel.org>
On 13. 05. 25, 0:16, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> After the conversion to locking guards within the interrupt core code,
> several builds with clang show the "Interrupts were enabled early"
> WARN() in start_kernel() on boot.
>
> In class_irqdesc_lock_constructor(), _t.flags is initialized via
> __irq_get_desc_lock() within the _t initializer list. However, the C11
> standard 6.7.9.23 states that the evaluation of the initialization list
> expressions are indeterminately sequenced relative to one another,
> meaning _t.flags could be initialized by __irq_get_desc_lock() then be
> initialized to zero due to flags being absent from the initializer list.
>
> To ensure _t.flags is consistently initialized, move the call to
> __irq_get_desc_lock() and the assignment of its result to _t.lock out of
> the designated initializer.
>
> Fixes: 0f70a49f3fa3 ("genirq: Provide conditional lock guards")
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-13 5:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-12 22:16 [PATCH] genirq: Ensure flags in lock guard is consistently initialized Nathan Chancellor
2025-05-13 5:22 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61d1b49c-e2ef-4a43-942d-6e321d4be8c8@kernel.org \
--to=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox