From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-180.mta0.migadu.com (out-180.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0CD73D6D for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 02:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729478788; cv=none; b=PCXY0Tvppz56MwB3ipBSo+uqYjN8x7Z0FroxBnCQbL4rdDUUvg3Sgi6CEgSvXuipBEW0GPZh2YTDG3AlR19GvNQjm2cztf77UqWTDVOf1yf7pNNm5oO186NccCwtXJMmka5kijfVBUnyVr9y6/6g2+SyI9OKm5mzE8yLYj96PIo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729478788; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nEkfqEZKi297Ya3FYZc6Z/v+FBbo4n8DiTeirv6PAdY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=WXix24zzvxVt0Dj8LyVEwFIcJfN/M+7QOe4zhmBg/1z3HaRvzRDSdO40c5gf2NJTND78g4W9jDOxQQCICzxFVEJOB3H8m7kkRVDUBGrnduVIBQd/YS3OoSvIKfjD6BuTCPbciOmZKarbdDmLgR/EEz42s242KX25ICNvM8Op2bg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=R2ofiCCc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="R2ofiCCc" Message-ID: <794f6563-019d-48f5-b96b-461f45ca7227@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1729478783; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hkLg3x86bnIDP1yW61gKyXCpkFf7Q3x/lzYYXvaKmzc=; b=R2ofiCCcOBkCfSUpQnanHFl2jPi+7bMYymVv5kySPyUtZjm4veyHgjmizLHRWSTtnH8eEi kY+7PxZmG2j/hmY8mKKhUGxVjc7SvuV+r4YzN52tTrFceV9Pe7ESlYcM5bPPyk35xl4mSR mIyh/XzIkjYRopuhxUPX143kgK405UQ= Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 10:46:06 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add the translation of documents in kbuild To: Dongliang Mu , Alex Shi , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , Jonathan Corbet , Alex Shi Cc: hust-os-kernel-patches@googlegroups.com, llvm@lists.linux.dev References: <8a882bc0-7125-4036-b939-fbd9e821c041@hust.edu.cn> <2bf8ba2e-9c5f-4f89-9399-f6320aa32a16@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Yanteng Si In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT 在 2024/10/21 10:13, Dongliang Mu 写道: > On 2024/10/21 09:29, Alex Shi wrote: >> >> On 10/19/24 14:19, Dongliang Mu wrote: >>> +to Jon and Alex. >>> >>> It seems that tocmd and cccmd does not work with cover letter. Any >>> suggestions? >>> >>>      tocmd ="`pwd`/scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --norolestats >>> --nol" >>>      cccmd ="`pwd`/scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --norolestats >>> --nom" >>> >> Do you mean that to or cc cmd should give a name list for cover-letter? >> I don't know if it's common needs, since some of people don't like to >> get every patches, maybe only the related patch is enough for them. >> But in another side, full name list is may wanted for others. >> >> Another interfere like this, is the 'git am 00*.patch', it failed on >> 0000-cover-letter as cover-letter is empty patch. I'm also not sure >> it's common needs... > > Yes. I realized it yesterday. And cover letter is not a patch. It > seems there is no need to handle cover letter specially. Hmm, By using git format-patch --to --cc, we can conveniently bundle a series of related patches into email format and directly specify the reviewers, which helps to keep communication clear and streamline the review process. As for the cover letter, b4 does a great job, and we can use git am *.mbx instead of git am 00*/*.patch. Thanks, Yanteng