From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (relay8-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81C1B1D63D9; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 18:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736965819; cv=none; b=XfySiGx+YNFUThy/x+FsSMO9HPMWuncT7yhKzrNFQAdVlSBoqa0HByt6JHX8G6Gc2d8QhzkN380pM26FoK+G8bKqZFnwKYK0QA7kdpdHLFB2BzwFvR8HdpjYhw/pz20T8n2o1pr8Wk6XZCtRCGSadC+JR3FVM636m7emhuo8QPg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736965819; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2IeLlHk2idwVKBXU4FgWrO2CoxQDyfsGXbk96BDsC8A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=C/fxQT3wnZgz+4LqpznwcChzhpAqJDHvTYfXnht1nMV0F7FOWathJnTpQNZOk118QLyCAkj4Y6PVpfjFUL4oRaXIairkVhiY7kcpNGPYmkrVsymwG9ZmF290AFkkcZSM2TaXxnuZ/qNjr6OSXPp5QIksn5GIKHtge7MmnUTvSLE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=HL9OoHot; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="HL9OoHot" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DBE11BF203; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 18:30:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1736965815; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GqBj7+G6NFiicKFyViQdTNE8H5JWq2ncE2tH/y9s9To=; b=HL9OoHotnvd6k/ocwHWV9azeSaVwqMLnUmrkYGe5HvzXG6m3NHStbpCemgE8jXfU77pCCS zfrEBNL5Y7TCDg2jKiBAqx4FNiFt0YG0uJ7ns9LoohDaXeEkyxZYGfrCeMvQU5rpLaceKp 8vFGVHgchHmQSDEmmj2idq6IBbJh2EfBCe1n68k2uBZIoBGv/m5JxzA+3AGJUMw7B08tiM YwlIhQaIZYcMahFMxRU+V4hIgefBwSxDMEEpysW8PAZfj57QRM3JfBShBwqjRxdqFu4Zr6 m4zqhK2XlwECuGngCJ7tB1T/5O7+Rw+mFVVB8hrHCC6FH9Ch1HMJl3UOPPvbeA== From: Miquel Raynal To: Mark Brown Cc: Raju Rangoju , Nathan Chancellor , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, patches@lists.linux.dev, kernel test robot Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: amd: Fix -Wuninitialized in amd_spi_exec_mem_op() In-Reply-To: (Mark Brown's message of "Tue, 14 Jan 2025 15:17:59 +0000") References: <20250111-spi-amd-fix-uninitialized-ret-v1-1-c66ab9f6a23d@kernel.org> <173678670956.71125.2320310623665812760.b4-ty@kernel.org> <87h661u2z9.fsf@bootlin.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4 Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 19:30:14 +0100 Message-ID: <874j20nd55.fsf@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-GND-Sasl: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com >> I'm wondering whether it's relevant to pull the branch you shared >> as-is. Do you plan on pushing this patch of top of it? Or shall I wait >> -rc1 for the SPI NAND part? > > Well, it's not a branch but rather a tag which complicates matters a > bit. I could cherry pick the patch over and make a new tag I guess? Or > you could just not do allmodconfig builds with clang? I'm worried about the others, if Linus happens to pull my tree before yours :) I don't specifically use clang :) > for you to fetch changes up to e896c04890aeff2292364c19632fc15d890d436c: > > spi: amd: Fix -Wuninitialized in amd_spi_exec_mem_op() (2025-01-14 > 15:07:11 +0000) Pulled into nand/next. Thanks a lot! Miqu=C3=A8l