From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94C8D19E for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frontend03.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.6.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NrWjY4SgXz1qybm; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 01:22:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan3.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.84]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NrWjX0vSpz1qqlR; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 01:22:40 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan3.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.84]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DiUuhnXlaHJ9; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 01:22:38 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: L9w5ayo6JQGgDusGnhVePL9x9OVfSDH16AZsAok4PJK/NjVMEjPpDaJpsfV403G4 Received: from igel.home (aftr-62-216-205-85.dynamic.mnet-online.de [62.216.205.85]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 01:22:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 71E832C132D; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 01:22:38 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: Nick Desaulniers , kernel test robot , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, trix@redhat.com, masahiroy@kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, npiggin@gmail.com, Nathan Chancellor , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, nicolas@fjasle.eu Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] powerpc/vdso: Remove unused '-s' flag from ASFLAGS References: <20221228-drop-qunused-arguments-v1-0-658cbc8fc592@kernel.org> <20221228-drop-qunused-arguments-v1-6-658cbc8fc592@kernel.org> <20230109222337.GM25951__25255.3859770828$1673303520$gmane$org@gate.crashing.org> X-Yow: Is this going to involve RAW human ecstasy? Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 01:22:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20230109222337.GM25951__25255.3859770828$1673303520$gmane$org@gate.crashing.org> (Segher Boessenkool's message of "Mon, 9 Jan 2023 16:23:37 -0600") Message-ID: <87cz7n2q7l.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Jan 09 2023, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > It is required by POSIX (for the c99 command, anyway). It *also* is > required to be supported when producing object files (so when no linking > is done). > > It is a GCC flag, and documented just fine: > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Link-Options.html#index-s Most assembler flags are unrelated to the flags passed to the compiler driver, and -s is no exception. POSIX has nothing to say about the sub-commands of the compiler anyway. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."