* [rfc, PATCH v1 1/1] hrtimers: Refactor hrtimer_clock_to_base_table initialisation
@ 2025-02-10 8:26 Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-11 12:18 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-13 21:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2025-02-10 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, linux-kernel, llvm
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, Nathan Chancellor,
Nick Desaulniers, Bill Wendling, Justin Stitt, Andy Shevchenko
Clang complains about overlapped initialisers in the
hrtimer_clock_to_base_table definition. With `make W=1` and
CONFIG_WERROR=y (which is default nowadays) this breaks
the build:
CC kernel/time/hrtimer.o
kernel/time/hrtimer.c:124:21: error: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Werror,-Winitializer-overrides]
124 | [CLOCK_REALTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_REALTIME,
kernel/time/hrtimer.c:122:27: note: previous initialization is here
122 | [0 ... MAX_CLOCKS - 1] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
(and similar for CLOCK_MONOTONIC, CLOCK_BOOTTIME, and CLOCK_TAI).
Refactor hrtimer_clock_to_base_table initialisation to make
the compiler happy.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
TBH, I don't like much this solution as it diminishes the point of that
override to be there in the first place. I haven't found better alternatives
as they may be too intrusive. Another one might be to remove this table,
but in such case the replacement might add latency to some cases (although
I haven't checked the generated code for, for example, switch-case approach).
In any case this is an rfc, I would be glad if somebody fixes this in a better
way.
kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index deb1aa32814e..8ec6ff36b9ad 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -118,13 +118,21 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hrtimer_cpu_base, hrtimer_bases) =
};
static const int hrtimer_clock_to_base_table[MAX_CLOCKS] = {
- /* Make sure we catch unsupported clockids */
- [0 ... MAX_CLOCKS - 1] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_REALTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_REALTIME,
+ [CLOCK_MONOTONIC] = HRTIMER_BASE_MONOTONIC,
+ [CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_BOOTTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_BOOTTIME,
+ [CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_SGI_CYCLE] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_TAI] = HRTIMER_BASE_TAI,
- [CLOCK_REALTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_REALTIME,
- [CLOCK_MONOTONIC] = HRTIMER_BASE_MONOTONIC,
- [CLOCK_BOOTTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_BOOTTIME,
- [CLOCK_TAI] = HRTIMER_BASE_TAI,
+ /* Make sure we catch unsupported clockids */
+ [CLOCK_TAI + 1 ... MAX_CLOCKS - 1] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
};
static inline bool hrtimer_base_is_online(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *base)
--
2.45.1.3035.g276e886db78b
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfc, PATCH v1 1/1] hrtimers: Refactor hrtimer_clock_to_base_table initialisation
2025-02-10 8:26 [rfc, PATCH v1 1/1] hrtimers: Refactor hrtimer_clock_to_base_table initialisation Andy Shevchenko
@ 2025-02-11 12:18 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-13 21:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2025-02-11 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, linux-kernel, llvm
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, Nathan Chancellor,
Nick Desaulniers, Bill Wendling, Justin Stitt
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:26:02AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Clang complains about overlapped initialisers in the
> hrtimer_clock_to_base_table definition. With `make W=1` and
> CONFIG_WERROR=y (which is default nowadays) this breaks
> the build:
>
> CC kernel/time/hrtimer.o
> kernel/time/hrtimer.c:124:21: error: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Werror,-Winitializer-overrides]
> 124 | [CLOCK_REALTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_REALTIME,
>
> kernel/time/hrtimer.c:122:27: note: previous initialization is here
> 122 | [0 ... MAX_CLOCKS - 1] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
>
> (and similar for CLOCK_MONOTONIC, CLOCK_BOOTTIME, and CLOCK_TAI).
>
> Refactor hrtimer_clock_to_base_table initialisation to make
> the compiler happy.
For the record, GCC also fails here.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfc, PATCH v1 1/1] hrtimers: Refactor hrtimer_clock_to_base_table initialisation
2025-02-10 8:26 [rfc, PATCH v1 1/1] hrtimers: Refactor hrtimer_clock_to_base_table initialisation Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-11 12:18 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2025-02-13 21:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2025-02-13 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Shevchenko, linux-kernel, llvm
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, Nathan Chancellor,
Nick Desaulniers, Bill Wendling, Justin Stitt, Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Feb 10 2025 at 10:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Clang complains about overlapped initialisers in the
> hrtimer_clock_to_base_table definition. With `make W=1` and
> CONFIG_WERROR=y (which is default nowadays) this breaks
> the build:
>
> CC kernel/time/hrtimer.o
> kernel/time/hrtimer.c:124:21: error: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Werror,-Winitializer-overrides]
> 124 | [CLOCK_REALTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_REALTIME,
>
> kernel/time/hrtimer.c:122:27: note: previous initialization is here
> 122 | [0 ... MAX_CLOCKS - 1] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
>
> (and similar for CLOCK_MONOTONIC, CLOCK_BOOTTIME, and CLOCK_TAI).
>
> Refactor hrtimer_clock_to_base_table initialisation to make
> the compiler happy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> TBH, I don't like much this solution as it diminishes the point of that
> override to be there in the first place. I haven't found better alternatives
> as they may be too intrusive. Another one might be to remove this table,
> but in such case the replacement might add latency to some cases (although
> I haven't checked the generated code for, for example, switch-case approach).
The only place this table is used is in __hrtimer_init(), which is not a
hot-path. The four resulting comparisons are probably not even noticable.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-13 21:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-10 8:26 [rfc, PATCH v1 1/1] hrtimers: Refactor hrtimer_clock_to_base_table initialisation Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-11 12:18 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-13 21:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).